Leaderboard

You'd be in the neighborhood for invisible sasquatch in treetops. OK, I'm being facetious. I hope you hear some better offers. Safe travels!

But only one. If we have two, they will disagree and we'll be right back where we are today without a clear view of "truth." (They seem a lot like weather forecasters in that sense.)

I heard him on that podcast also, but came away with a different view and it is not a flattering one. He sounded like a fool when pressed for details on what they would study. He came across as very amateurish when he was talking about the sound analysis. Perhaps his ideas are great, but he is not the best face of this project because he melted the second he was asked to explain something and it was a friendly interview. The other thing that really jumped out at me was when he claimed that if he were to be taken to an area with a single footprint, where nobody else could figure out where the trackway went, he would be able to figure it out. That is a delusional, unhealthy amount of ego that doesn't make me trust the results of his work. This was right after he was claiming that most of the sasquatch researchers he knows are the smartest people around, so he clearly thinks a little too much of his intellect.

Hello from California, fascinated by the prospect of a large unidentified primate and looking to absorb more information.

I think I've seen it as an AI depiction, too. Can't give you a site, though.

No. No he has scolded me repeatedly for debating the WRONG SUBJECT….. Has he scolded you?🤔

And here is the rub. We specifically point out the reasons that Patty cannot be a man in a suit. 1) Size 2) Midtarsal break 3) forward slung face 4) longer arms 5) Compliant gait 6) sloped head. So IF Patty is a Homo Sapien? Then obviously you think the PGF is a hoax? Here is Bill Munns very eloquently pointing out the differences in morphology between Patty and Homo Sapiens……

What I am plainly saying and your tap dancing like a chicken on a hot plate? IS THAT PATTY WILL NOT PASS AS A HUMAN WOMAN EVEN IF YOU PUT HER IN WOMANS CLOTHING!!!!! Show me a video of Zana walking across a sand bar? Show me Zana’s skeleton? Show me a picture of Zana? No? Then do me a favor and leave Zana out of it. Her DNA is human? Because she was a Homo Sapien woman…. And anecdotal stories about her size, strength are embellished. PATTY IS NOT HOMO SAPIEN. I showed you the tallest woman in the world. She looks nothing like Patty. Your trying to shoe horn a crackpot DNA study to say THIS is a Homo Sapien👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

He's debating, just like you and I. Defending his position, just like scientists do. If you don't like his theories, you can always try to stop his "publication", like they tried to do with Ketchum. She simply did an end-around, but (of course) that was a violation of their rules. The end result was almost the same: They discredited her theory of hybrid human by simply destroying its validity exactly like they did Galileo (attacking his violation of their rules of presentation)..........but they failed completely to destroy the growing evidence that these things are human (of the genus Homo). Moreover, with Margaryan's "proof" that Zana was Homo sapien, they are further boxed in to it.......indeed, even tighter. They must posit that Zana's description was embellished (which you just did), and must rule that Patty is a man (Homo sapien) in a suit. They have no other recourse. No other retreats. Unless they go with the extraterrestrial escape hatch............