Leaderboard

My point was bear shoulders can’t do this but the Jacobs figure can.

Anything that has to do with religion requires "FAITH". Faith is belief without proof. Science is about proving ideas wrong. Whatever is left is assumed to be true at that moment, until proof to the contrary appears. Leave all things nephilim at the laboratory door. Melba and her ilk are tedious, frequently pedantic and always exasperating.

Right. HUMAN. Almost 8 billion strong…. Are you arguing that the Jacobs photo is that of a human? If it was a 8 legged land Octopus? Would that be a sufficient stab at logic? The limb ratios are NOT that of a Bear…🤷‍♂️

Is there a time limit in the way of remainder of 2023 or into 2024 or as long as the money lasts? I would suggest that persons / groups that want to submit samples be required to give money to the program. My thoughts on donating money might be a way to minimize fakes. I am reminded of the sad DNA samples sent to British geneticist Bryan Sykes (RIP). The Russian 'DNA' samples contained American Black Bear hair/fur. That fake was international in scope to get Black Bear samples to Russia and then dump garbage on Sykes. Note: do not accept samples from Russia. I read the sample survey. Good luck with the screening procedures.

Sad news, our long time member, Branco, passed away on February 18, 2022 at the age of 87. I will miss him greatly.

I know he talked about working on another book or two. I wonder if any of his family intend to complete that work, but then his voice was unique. He must have kept meticulous notes, etc.

I’m saddened by this news. Bill stepped into my business right as I joined the BFF in 2011. He offered me advice regarding the area I was investigating, as well as the different types of creatures I’d find there. He was very correct. He was kind, but firm - Obviously a result of his law enforcement background. He was an original that could spin a yarn with the best of them. Admittedly, I used to temper my response to his forum violations because I knew what he meant most of the time. He wasn’t one to beat around the bush. I find that the older I get the more I realize that he was right to be true to himself and say what he meant. RIP, Bill.

He's got some very nice footage! I like his channel.

I think you have no idea what’s in the data Hiflier and you’re just swallowing Melba Ketchum hook, line and sinker. You don’t wanna address Ketchum’s hoaxing and crazy beliefs because again you’re on the Melba Ketchum train. You do this. You got on the pro kill kick and wrote a book. Now you’re not. Several kicks later? You’re a full on Melba Ketchum disciple! A year from now? Who knows? Either way? I will be here patiently waiting for Melba Ketchum after thousands of dollars and a bunch of podcasts explain why the meanie heads won’t accept her shoddy work…..🤦🏻‍♂️

Welcome , Jenkie & squatch seeker !

My point being is that technology has come along way. I could pull up hunting shows with Elk running around across the canyon shot with hand held cameras. Ridiculous clarity. This is part of the problem with the PGF. Everyone expects Natgeo clarity from 2 1960’s cowboys. I think the PGF is better than the Freeman stuff. Early VHS cam corders were horrible.

There is a big difference between the PGF and the Jacobs photo. The Jacobs photo is unclear. It's not sure what we are looking at. Even if I knew it was not Bigfoot I still can't tell what normal thing it is or account for why it looks the way it does. Even if I thought it was Bigfoot I can't explain why it looks so unlike an ape/monkey/bigfoot. The PGF is very very clear. It's so clear we can all agree exactly what it is: It is a biped walking with an unhuman, odd walk. Nearly all learned skeptics agree on that and don't dispute it. The only Q is if it is a 1) man in a suit or 2) a real unknown creature as claimed by the persons filming it that day.

I say that it is not a sasquatch. If they are at some point proven to exist and they look just like that, I would probably retract my statement. Although the likelihood of it being a bear is decent, it just has a weird vibe to it. It to me, it looks like a chimp which is almost as preposterous as a sasquatch and seems less likely than a bear. It is much easier to say it is something that defies simple identification, other than something weird, and move on. No one can convince me that it is one of the three options or none of the three options. It is just a mysterious photo of a weird moment in time.

Hi Vinchyfoot! Goodbye Vinchyfoot.

Cliff Barackman and James "Bobo" Fay speak with audio analyst Devin (AKA "Monongahela") about his research into potential sasquatch vocalizations! Devin discusses his background and interest in the subject, and conducts in-depth analyses of six sound files in this episode! Read more about Devin's work here: http://sasquatchbioacoustic.blogspot.com Listen to the Podcast

This was an excellent episode. The guest Devin talks about his credentials and then goes on to really direct six audio files he brings to the show. Very in-depth on audio analysis and what to look/listen for.