Leaderboard

BECAUSE IT CAME BACK AS HUMAN…. 🤦🏻‍♂️

NO! IT NEVER GOT PUBLISHED! It got posted online by her own website that was a $30 pay per view site! It has more in common with midget porn than it does science!

For the record: 1) It will take a body on a slab. 2) Patty is the real deal, and best we have/had. 3). Zana was just a humane woman, greatly exaggerated. #fishtales 4). Ketchum is full of bull hooky 5). standing is 100^ bull hooky. 🤷🏻🤷🏻🤷🏻🤷🏻

Hey Twist! Nice of you to show up!🤨

I’m late to the party… but Huntster and Hiflier are claiming that Ketchum has been right this whole time…😂😂😂. Yup the rest of science has denied this REVOLUTIONARY science the whole time! God Forbid another scientist jumped in to to steal this research. Hell, Ketchum has to publish it on her own site to make it so!! At least Hiflier and Huntster made up from the tarpit! I thought Huntster had Hiflier on his knees crying!!!

You're doing much better than me with this stuff. Hope my envy doesn't show......TOO much

http://sasquatchgenomeproject.org/linked/author_s_response_to__reviews2.pdf They wanted "a theory" (after previously condemning "theories"). They damned sure weren't happy about it when they got one. In the end, it really doesn't matter. Had Ketchum charmed Mr. Gee well enough to get published, a Margaryan would have arisen in a matter of months, "as expected", to publish an alternative that would have simply cancelled out Ketchum, and would have been roundly applauded by "the community", and rewarded with future opportunities and honors. Yet again, it's left up to norseman and his mighty Hammer of Thor to provide fresh meat. I pray that he is able to do so while maintaining a heartbeat and his home address outside of a federal prison. "As expected", that is the only way in Hell that this heresy is going to be recorded in Scientific Scripture. The whole thing feels like Galileo, Castelli, Lorini, Ingoli, and Urban all over again, and almost immediately after Sykes/Margaryan. "Simplicio!"

http://sasquatchgenomeproject.org/linked/author_s_response_to__reviews2.pdf Yet: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ggn2.10051 Bias?

I listened to the last interview of the very incredible Chuck Jones conducted by Leslie Gross two weeks before his death. His voice was still full of fun and life. I will remember him forever. A cousin of mine (a lawyer) is married to a Hollywood cartoonist. At family functions I love to joke around with them. Imagine the joke material!

Gahan Wilson (RIP) was my favorite cartoonist. His cartoons can be viewed online. Several pieces of his work would work well with this forum. This one is good: "Get Doctor Kichner and hurry" One has to search a Gahan Wilson collection. Individual Google search did not work. This one is really good: "Whatever it is, it seems to be coming closer" "And every day it's costing more and more" "Is nothing sacred?" the cartoon, not the book. A good sense of humor is required for the activities that we carry out.

LOL! Where's my white lab coat? With my proficiency in proofreading and grammar, I can become the next great peer reviewer at Nature!

Just so this Forum knows, stay with proven science and don't let personalities get in the way of it. Because sometimes people will hold up a personality issue hoping it becomes a more important issue that the actual science of discovery that has already taken place. It's a very important and revealing science to be sure. And even the announcements on the nest genetics outcome is very important and revealing on at least two levels. One is the Human factor involved at the nest site, and the other is that it corroborates a critical previous study. The only issue left now is what to do about it? The best anyone can do right now is spread the word. Because Sasquatch as genus Homo should RIGHTFULLY take center stage and the scientists who have fought to put that issue at center stage should be recognized for that scientific accomplishment no matter their personal weaknesses or misgivings. Maybe in doing so the world might just look at us "crackpots" a little differently. And also right now genetic outcomes are all we've got. But the data exists now from not just one source and will stand up to scrutiny. Been a long time coming, yes?

Now you're beginning to wake up? Why now? And you shouldn't be asking me about what's in the SGP paper and Dr. Hart's book. It's all been posted on this Forum a hundred times. You just turn your back on it all because you hate Ketchum and so will NOT look at the science in front of you for what it's saying. You've allowed Dr. Ketchum so far under your skin the raw science in front of you is nothing but a huge blind spot. You've allowed your opinion of her to throw up a wall to some very valuable information. I got by her a long time ago. I can only hope you can that too someday.

Im talking about the peer review process. You discover something and then expect me to pay to review it. Does Ford make consumer reports buy the vehicles it tests? Is it contingent on the report itself? A Bad review? Get my drift? I disagree. As I’ve said many times Ketchum did this to herself.

I went out Saturday afternoon to check out the location of a decades old sighting right in my city. The location is a large regional park that encompasses a mountain that is bordered by farms on the west and south sides, some light industry on the east side, and the Fraser River on the north side. The park covers much of the crest of the mountain, and the entire mountain is about 10km e/w and 5km n/s. The park itself is heavily forested in mature second growth timber and has a network of old logging roads and more recent mountain bike trails. The sighting story involves a small group of Cub Scouts who were on a camp out near a small lake on the mountain top. They were playing a game of hide and seek in the forest a few hundred meters from the campsite when they noticed that another being had joined in the game. They described the new player as a hair covered person about 5' tall, who would peek out from behind a stump or tree, then disappear, to show up again behind another bush or stump. This apparently went on for 15 minutes or so, before finally leaving the game for good. The weather was cool and damp for my trip up there, after weeks of extremely hot and dry conditions, so visibility was limited near the summit by a combination of clouds and smoke from forest fires in the nearby mountains. There were only a few vehicles in the park, probably bike riders using the trails that lace the area, as seen in the map screenshot below. I spent several hours driving and walking the old roads, but found no tracks or other evidence, but did spot a nice healthy looking blacktail deer, a young buck with his antlers just emerging in velvet, about 4" long, shorter than his ears. The orange line on the Gaia screenshot is my route, and the white dotted lines are the bike trails.

LOL! Of course not. I spent my money on BB guns, archery equipment, and knives. Mrs. Huntster bought them, though. She lived in Ogden, too……..recognized them immediately as brine shrimp, probably from the Great Salt Laje.

Are you being deliberately obstinate?

It’s not an opinion. It’s a fact. The rejection is that her work wasn’t published…. Dude.

This really seems to support my theory as presented in those other current threads pertaining to the multiple hominid species coming and going over time, the results of both natural selection and potentially inter-hominid hybridizations. Initially the clip speaks of them being5-6' tall(considerably larger than most Orang Pendek reported)but later in the clip they speak of creatures 7' tall. And while throughout the discussion these creatures are referred to as rock apes, I feel it has little bearing on the actual nature or heritage of them, but is rather more akin to Fred Becks assigning the term Ape to the creatures that attacked them that eventful night. Seems almost second nature for us Moderns to designate furry hominids "apes" as if we don't have fur but a switch or two away in our own genome!I But the real give away is that statement about the Vietnamese government later investigating these reports finding human/sasquatch like prints, which dispells the possibility of them being orangutans or offshoots of them, and infers they are some remnant form of hominid which either evolved there(an Asian branch of bipedal hominid evolution, be it parallel or convergent?) Or is the result of previous waves of African hominid expansion that have been "hybridized"(sex-monkey theory)with subsequent waves, or are of a "single wave" that then speciated into the now indigenous form. Their ability to mount an assault as described in the video is impressive to say the least and might well indicate a higher form of awareness, as well as communication, than seen in non-hominid forms. I wonder if it's possible to track down any vets who were actually there that night and take down a first hand account of the event. Of course they may all be secreted away, least such accounts proliferate... But maybe this represent one of the steps or stages that lead to the furry hominids that eventually crossed the Bering straight. In that that region has been relatively unchanging environmentally(near equatorial jungle, largely unaffected by more recent glaciations)it's quite possible these hominids had evolved into effective generalists with little pressure to develop further, at least physically, and perhaps they don't find the more recent hairless versions all that attractive, so they aren't invited to the hybrid parties. It does seem that these forms are coexisting with the local Moderns, at least until the Moderns come up with overtly superior lethal technologies, which then force the withdrawl into remote, harder to reach regions on the part of these earlier forms.

I had read every word of the correspondence exchanges between the SGP and Nature's peer reviewers when everything first came out. And a lot of Nature's statements still grate on me to this day. I don't pick stupid battles just for the sake of lashing out at ghosts or simply to display any skills at debate. The paper that was first submitted did need revisions and revisions was what it got- as was asked for. But it was obvious from the beginning that the paper was doomed. Not because it wasn't "scientific" enough, but because it was based on a subject that couldn't be allowed to have a scientific audience or credence in any way shape or form. As far as the BF community was concerned? It wasn't good enough that the paper got rejected. Nope, let loose the hounds anyway to make sure that Dr. Ketchum and the study was so vilified, and so brutally, that the level of the attack itself became suspect. To this day I truly am convinced that it was an organized effort aimed at making sure that the science of Sasquatch, no matter who conducted it, was slated for destruction right from the get go. If folks today STILL don't think that the subject of Sasquatch existence isn't a dangerous topic then read the entire SGP presentation and then think again. An enormous amount of power and effort has gone into slamming the study and attacking D. Ketchum that it should be obvious that NO ONE, Dr. Disotell, Dr. Meldrum, Dr. Mayor, or any other researcher or Sasquatch study won't get the same treatment to themselves or their careers if any of them ever gets as close to the truth about the reality of the creature as Dr. Ketchum did. My advice to everyone is to THOROUGHLY read through ALL articles in the SGP and they will see the obvious purposeful dismantling of the study. And for no other reason than that it threatens billions if not trillions of dollars in revenue brought in from just about every outdoor activity one can think of- whether its corporate harvesting or recreational activities of all sorts. Say what you will folks. The scientific DNA study results are there. But the BEST way to get folks to not look at them is to trash the authors of that study. An effort that has never ceased in its vehemence at every moment and every chance that the subject comes up. But I see no one slamming the results of the Washington nest DNA results? I don't know why that is, because as far as I can see those results are basically corroborating Dr. Ketchum results. BOTH the SGP and Dr. Disotell are saying HUMAN. BOTH of them. Ketchum had 130 samples, Disotell had five. But BOTH came out Human. And yet only Ketchum got vilified? But of the two, Ketchum and Disotell, which one SHOWED THEIR WORK? Which one was a five year double blind study across 12 independent labs? Which one presented papers to NATURE? Which DNA outcome went PUBLIC? Which study was the most courageous? And then which one got the worst backlash and STILL gets the worst backlash to this day? Time to wake up folks because we have vicious wolves in the herd who work hard to stifle truth and discovery at every turn. Rant over? You bet it isn't.

I'm not giving her a pass. I think she's foolishly associated with hoaxers, and her self-publishing gimmick backfired. And I really don't care how many parking tickets she's accumulated and whether or not the state of Texas likes her. Nor do I care whether personalities on a bigfoot internet forum like her or not. I read her/their work. Completely. I read all rounds of peer review questions. I believe it is more valid than not. I don't care about the publishing protocol as much as finding answers and pursuing leads. It's really that simple.