Leaderboard

Wrong. From Nature: A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA " ..... Th/U radiometric analysis of multiple bone specimens using diffusion–adsorption–decay dating models indicates a burial date of 130.7 ± 9.4 thousand years ago. These findings confirm the presence of an unidentified species of Homo at the CM site during the last interglacial period (MIS 5e; early late Pleistocene), indicating that humans with manual dexterity and the experiential knowledge to use hammerstones and anvils processed mastodon limb bones for marrow extraction and/or raw material for tool production. "

How's fishin'?

I went out Saturday afternoon to check out the location of a decades old sighting right in my city. The location is a large regional park that encompasses a mountain that is bordered by farms on the west and south sides, some light industry on the east side, and the Fraser River on the north side. The park covers much of the crest of the mountain, and the entire mountain is about 10km e/w and 5km n/s. The park itself is heavily forested in mature second growth timber and has a network of old logging roads and more recent mountain bike trails. The sighting story involves a small group of Cub Scouts who were on a camp out near a small lake on the mountain top. They were playing a game of hide and seek in the forest a few hundred meters from the campsite when they noticed that another being had joined in the game. They described the new player as a hair covered person about 5' tall, who would peek out from behind a stump or tree, then disappear, to show up again behind another bush or stump. This apparently went on for 15 minutes or so, before finally leaving the game for good. The weather was cool and damp for my trip up there, after weeks of extremely hot and dry conditions, so visibility was limited near the summit by a combination of clouds and smoke from forest fires in the nearby mountains. There were only a few vehicles in the park, probably bike riders using the trails that lace the area, as seen in the map screenshot below. I spent several hours driving and walking the old roads, but found no tracks or other evidence, but did spot a nice healthy looking blacktail deer, a young buck with his antlers just emerging in velvet, about 4" long, shorter than his ears. The orange line on the Gaia screenshot is my route, and the white dotted lines are the bike trails.

Im accusing Ketchum of being a crackpot. And I said Patty is not Homo Sapien. It’s tough to debate you when you move the goal posts to suit your own argument.

And here is the rub. We specifically point out the reasons that Patty cannot be a man in a suit. 1) Size 2) Midtarsal break 3) forward slung face 4) longer arms 5) Compliant gait 6) sloped head. So IF Patty is a Homo Sapien? Then obviously you think the PGF is a hoax? Here is Bill Munns very eloquently pointing out the differences in morphology between Patty and Homo Sapiens……

What I am plainly saying and your tap dancing like a chicken on a hot plate? IS THAT PATTY WILL NOT PASS AS A HUMAN WOMAN EVEN IF YOU PUT HER IN WOMANS CLOTHING!!!!! Show me a video of Zana walking across a sand bar? Show me Zana’s skeleton? Show me a picture of Zana? No? Then do me a favor and leave Zana out of it. Her DNA is human? Because she was a Homo Sapien woman…. And anecdotal stories about her size, strength are embellished. PATTY IS NOT HOMO SAPIEN. I showed you the tallest woman in the world. She looks nothing like Patty. Your trying to shoe horn a crackpot DNA study to say THIS is a Homo Sapien👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

I don’t see it that way. You’re claiming that Sasquatch is a Homo Sapien. I am arguing why it’s not. And I have linked tons of material why it’s not. I’ve also offered alternative explanations why there would be Homo Sapien DNA in the nests. Sorry that my argument hasn’t followed your narrative.