Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/07/2023 in all areas

  1. Make sure you save a blood sample when you’re done bathing to test for DNA. 😉
    2 points
  2. “Hypothetically posting: about $25 of N2O at 5 lbs of gas would give just under 43 cubic feet of happiness.” Your ability to calculate the cost per cubic foot of Nitrous Oxide happiness is admirable, Catmando. And, point well taken about the kooks, there seems to be an endless supply of those lately. So, tightest, most trusted crew possible I think. “Hair samples or one really good photo is all that is needed to prove its existence.” - NorCalWitness riiight! And, there have been many hair samples collected, fame 352 of the PGF is a really good photo (to anyone who understands what they are seeing) and Hiflier even has definitive DNA! So, why no Scientific classification!? I think Norse is right in that, at least so far, a body will be required. All I'm saying is that a live body, later released alive and relatively unharmed is the best option. The people I talk to don't leave thinking it's all a joke. Generally, I am able to at least give even skofftics a pause so, sorry if your experience is negative. We really don't need the ridicule here. A tranq definitely seems like a better option to me than Nitrous. If there’s a Bigfoot trapped then it’s mass can be estimated and a suitable dose applied.
    1 point
  3. A dart gets my vote, less moving pieces and messing with gases in a confined space could go south quick. For a dose just base it off what would be used for a gorilla and size up as appropriate, we're all primates so that's what makes the most sense to me.
    1 point
  4. Don't forget the nitrous oxide! I remember huffing that stuff at Grateful Dead shows when i was young. They actually had an album called "Without a Net." So, if you have enough nitrous, then no net is necessary...
    1 point
  5. Yes. Based off of Ketchum’s DNA work. Good luck. Just a FYI? Just as I helped you write a book? I also helped you establish your own DNA sub forum on the BFF. I’ve always helped you Hiflier. And all I get is grief for it. That’s on you….not me. https://bigfootforums.com/forum/178-sasquatch-e-dna-project/ Ok, done with DNA again. Back to traps, caves and net guns……
    1 point
  6. Now do the thread author.
    1 point
  7. Question for you: What poster, in the thread, suggested a pitfall trap? Hint: It wasn't Norse. You're confused. I'm not being snarky.
    1 point
  8. Cough::it's xspiders thread and pit idea. You're embarrassing yourself::Cough
    1 point
  9. Norseman is not a no kill proponent, just to be clear. he wants to bathe in the blood of a Sasquatch. To each their own. Goodall didn't need to kill anything, did she?
    1 point
  10. Someone hasn't done their homework. I suggest reading at least the first couple pages of the thread.
    1 point
  11. Oh, C'mon. That wasn't Norseman's proposal. You're ridiculing another "no kill" proponent.
    1 point
  12. I think your comment is a joke. You don’t want the animal shot, but you are not willing to discuss a live capture?
    1 point
  13. Oh sure, like spending thousands and thousands of dollars digging a 16ft deep hole 16x16 and filling it with laughing gas is constructive? How about scooping up a little water, or soil, or sampling some air, and having it tested for a new species of Homo for a few hundred dollars? Get a positive result and then turn science loose on finding the thing for further analysis. On THEIR dime. Now THAT'S what I would consider saying something constructive. Anyone agree?
    1 point
  14. check the post above your most recent snark. No reason to get personal. Although that is how forums go most of the time, I would hope our community would be nicer to one another as we share a common obsession.
    0 points
  15. with threads like this, no wonder people think we are a joke.
    -1 points
  16. bugs are not apex mamilian predators. the risk of injury to a potentially super rare species is real, but that probably makes your dingles tingle. "The only joke is we believing a real creature is out there and we have ZERO physical proof said creature is out there." How about you get one tiny shred of any evidence first before proposing some high cost, absurd and unrealistic fantasy. Its a shame that this thread has 9 pages and other threads are hardly a page.
    -1 points
  17. I personally appreciate his contributions. Don't bring your personal beef into every thread he posts in. I will chalk it up to you having a bad day because I generally enjoy your posting, but there is no reason to keep up this hostility. We need to stop the infighting. Listen to this, starting at 32:30. Then tell me if you have any thoughts about what you hear.
    -1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...