Leaderboard

I came across two videos showing possible sasquatch handprints with indications of hair pattern. I'll post one video here and the other in another post. This video was made by Snow White Bigfoot. She's a researcher, of sorts, with a lot of videos on youtube. She and her husband live on a 300 acre farm but it's never mentioned where it it's located. They're surrounded by woods. Judging by the fact the video was made in January (I think) and it shows almost no snow on the ground, I figure they can't be all that far north. Maybe no further than the upper south? This print was on the side of their van. She feels the print is showing the back of a possible sasquatch hand, and shows possible hair patterns. Fortunately there are some closer up pics that show detail. You start seeing the handprint about :54. At 6:44 she talks about some of the details in the print.

I hope this thread doesn't go off the tracks...

In thinking of it some more, I agree Black Bears are what I have seen. I just have been confused over the years. Wish you all well, CP

This is really an excellent point. An individual directly involved in the PG event ended up becoming Assistant Secretary of Fish, Wildlife and Parks in the Department of the Interior. Mr. Laverty has always seemed forthcoming when asked about sasquatches, but has mostly remained quiet about his interest and history in the phenomenon. He has been most recently interviewed by telephone by researcher Daniel Perez, and he was cooperative, but Mr. Perez didn't query Mr. Laverty regarding DOI policy or missions regarding sasquatches. Bobby Short reported that, in addition to being credited with photographing the PG event footprints on Monday morning, Oct. 23rd, 1967, Laverty was associated with a personal bigfoot sighting near Hyampom and a bigfoot 'nest' found near Scorpion Creek in the Lonesome Ridge region near upper Bluff Creek. Laverty's service at the cabinet level did not move the ball an inch. Nothing changed at all. And his general silence, even during his years of service in the region in the 1960's, and especially of his own sighting and finds, supports the contention that the official policy is one of silence and discouragement.

Bigfoot knowledge went right to the very top of the US Forest Service. Did it help? Nope. https://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/laverty-bh/

Two pictures of saucers. One was taken by a farmer in Oregon in 1950. The other was taken by a mapping camera mounted to an aircraft at 10,000 ft by the National Geographic Society 20 odd years later in Costa Rica. Why do I keep using UFOs to illustrate my point? Because blurry pie plates in the sky defied skeptical explanations to explain them away as hoax’s, birds, swamp gas, Venus light refraction and other bogus talking points. As long as people keep seeing hairy bipeds in our nations hinterlands and recording giant tracks? This will continue to defy explanation.

Or a natural phenomenon that messed with the DNA of all things on the planet, or at least one side of it, similar to a bollide (meteor) impact but more akin to a severe gamma or cosmic ray intrusion. The signature of such an event would be a high concentration layer of beryllium-10 (Be-10) and other isotopes in the Earth's soils and sediments, as well as in the ice cores. These isotopes get created when large cosmic ray bombardments occur and the cosmic particle influxes collides with atoms in our atmosphere. For this part of the discussion I present an older paper from the 1990's to show that this type of research isn't new: https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1987EM%26P...37..241L

Who cares!? just joking I think they are genetically altered primates, similar to the altercations that made Us 'human', yet very different. Who or what altered them and Us, I don't know. In our case, there were sudden and extreme advancements in our abilities about 12,500 years ago (after the last Younger Dryas) from hunter/gatherer to farmer/astronomer that cannot be explained without advanced intervention. Same with Bigfoot; except for building sky scrapers and walking on the moon, their abilities apparently include surviving in the woods without being 'discovered' via Ninja skills such as easily traversing in thick woods and perhaps blocking electromagnetism. There are too many failed attempts to categorize them as 'just another Ape', imo.

Personally I think it's more important to see what gov thinks they are.

And why would this mammal evolve over tens of thousands of years for that type of vision or senses ?, It wouldn't because it serves it no purpose until the last 40 years or so. Wouldn't make any sense

Animals and fish through evolution have different physical attributes they have for hunting if they are predators or if they are the prey , eyes on the side , changing color etc.... How old is infrared I know it's been there forever but? 200 years since discovered ? Then in the last 30 years wildly available to the public They would not suddenly evolve to see infrared. I mean they are not reptiles . I know bats also see it but that is such a rarity. Even in most reptiles to have infrared vision is rare because most don't . Why would a Sasquatch which is suppose to be a mammal evolve to have infrared vision ? No that isn't it in my opinion . There are no ancestral great apes that had infrared vision . Unless they are not mammals and they are something else not from this world

As I asked in my previous post. Are cams inconclusive because they are blurry? YES! So far what Norse and Huntster have presented are blurry ass evidence. This is not to knock Norse or Huntster. But to reinforce my claim that we have no viable evidence. Nothing clear. BF is not caught on cam. In today’s world, cams are not enough. I’m about done in believing in this mythical creature despite having what I have always believed to be a class B experience. Personally. 7.62 has provided a very valid argument against trail cams. Multiple members on the BFF have countered his points. I’m my opinion, unsuccessfully. His point stands. BF will slap campers, steal from coolers, show up on cams. Etc. Unless it’s a cam that can prove existence. Then it avoids it. Ninja of the woods!!

My perspective is a bit different. It would seem to me that WE are the ones who evolved down the different path- and we're all by ourselves. Case in point (and I'm only going to bring this up once, trust me!) The mutations that we see in that DNA chart are COMMON IN OTHER PRIMATES. To me? That's a huge clue not to be overlooked. Plus our brain genes are NOT like the other Great Apes or all other primates. To be honest? Why science uses Humans as a the point of reference to compare everything else to has only muddied the waters. It only complicates the primate evolutionary picture picture! The reference SHOULD be Gorillas or Chimps, because if it was then it would truly open our eyes to what is, and what we are, as Human Beings.

Evolutionary biology in other animals stokes the fire around the idea of "supernatural" vision. 1. Dogs see magnetic fields: https://www.thewildest.com/dog-behavior/dogs-sense-magnetic-fields#:~:text=Dogs Are Tuning Into Magnetic,conditions of the magnetic field. 2. how humans evolved to see full color: https://www.genengnews.com/news/evolution-of-humans-full-color-vision-brought-to-light/ Is it possible that Sasquatch eyesight has evolved down a different path than ours, giving them sensitivity to electric fields and other spectrums (magnetic fields, infrared, etc.)? If you were walking in a forest and saw a beam of something in front of you, would you walk through it or around it?

Here is the second video. This one is from from West Virginia. I wondered if any of our West VA. people on here might be familiar with this already and maybe know something about it. The prints and smudges were on the back of a truck belonging to who I think is the founder of West Virginia Crytids and Strange Encounters. He starts talking at 52:34 about how he had discovered the handprints on the back of his truck. Fortunately he says just where he is. He was on Bickle Knob, in Randolph County.

Down voting the truth? This is not good to see. Because that's what I wrote. No guts, no glory. I mean, you know that USFW doesn't take you seriously, right? They consider going after Bigfoot to be only a "recreational activity". Does anyone think that "woo-woo" reports do anything to make that viewpoint any better? So to topic,: "How have the "woo-woo" reports affected your opinion?" My opinion of what? Bigfoot? The Bigfoot world? All "woo-woo" has done is embarrass the hell out of me as a researcher. Makes me ashamed to even be involved. Okay, I answered the topic's question. Norseman told me once a long time ago that my problem was that I was trying to be everyone's friend here. Now? I sugar coat nothing and spoon feed no one. Happy now?

Page 8.... The two questions I have just asked goes to the very heart of this tread regarding "woo-woo." Because proof of existence would at least set one on the road to addressing that issue. Example: Has anyone ever asked Dr. Meldrum whether or not he has asked USFW about Sasquatch existence. How about Dr Disotell? Or Dr. Mayor? Or the Olympic Project? Or Loren Coleman? Or Matt Moneymaker and the entire BFRO organization? Does anyone think that any of these Bigfoot heavy-hitting influencers have ever bothered to ASK USFW for an answer on whether or not Sasquatch exists? These are hard questions folks but I can make it easy for everyone. NO, none of them have ever asked. And I'm ashamed of them. And what might that say about anyone's chances at getting to the bottom of proof? Or much less the "woo-woo"? Hmmm, does zero ring a bell? No one asks, therefore, no one knows...therefore, no one asks...therefore....................no one knows. So on, and so forth. Because looking at Meldrum, or anyone else for that matter, for any answers on existence ain't gonna help one bit. But fear not , folks, cause ol' hiflier, one of your very own, for better or for worse, has got the ball on this.