Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/17/2023 in all areas

  1. Dr J? There is no science involved. Tip: you should look into his background, ALL OF IT, especially his time practicing in Grants Pass, OR, before you cite him.
    2 points
  2. 93’ Last year of the first Gens.
    2 points
  3. I don't know. Maybe contact the psychic friends network for clues. This thread on fluffy foo foo woo woo needs to be stirred up. No, the word salads of podcasts have no affect on me. I don't have a TV and I don't listen to podcasts and I don't read reports. What have I missed? Nothing. I dusted off my soft bound book " In the Spirit of Seatco", by Henry Franzoni III. I was looking for Tesla frequencies but had to look elsewhere. The book has good info on Tesla's work that might help. Read pages 121---136, but don't limit yourself. Tesla passed and had a secret device in his hotel safe. It was a 'multi-decade resistance box' that you might call a 'Wheatstone Bridge'. Strange stuff and why was it in a safe? You have to read the book to get the explanation. The Tesla frequencies should be considered. 432Hz and 369Hz. There are more frequencies but I think that these 2 are good starters. Consumer level microphones can pick up these frequencies but a lot depends on the mic, cable, maybe pre-amp and the recorder. One has to have a target to aim at. Very difficult so far since close range is required. No guns. There are many reports of Sasquatch going invisible for hundreds of years of oral and written history. I have not seen this but too many people have. How do they do that? I don't know is a good answer. Human and machine vision depends on differences in contrast to focus. Human vision detects contrast differences at edges of items. People who have seen the 'shimmer' or 'glimmer', what ever you want to call it, have detected edges. The question is, does this shimmer scenario emit a noise / sound that our audio equipment can detect? The hypothetical result would be anecdotal without a positive verification of the target. Why no guns? From 'In the Spirit of Seatco' , page 121: Indian wisdom: "You are an idiot if you try to hurt one of the Seatco. You are an idiot because first of all you are a violent destructive idiot and secondly because they can kill you with a thought." The book is available from Amazon Kindle. Have an open mind. Some humans have extra abilities. Military rumors exist about spies who can do remote viewing. And then there is Kreskin. He has limited access to casino games. Way back, we had lamp oil for illumination. After Tesla invented the light bulb, we tried to conquer night time. We have day shift, swing shift and graveyard. Thanks Tesla.
    2 points
  4. And so far as "paranormal" .. ANYTHING that falls outside of current science that is real rather than imagined is paranormal. Paranormal is just the normal we haven't explained yet. Not necessarily hogwash. SOMETHING was observed. SOMETHING left tracks. SOMETHING left blood or hair. The question is what label we put on the something, then what reality lies behind the label.
    1 point
  5. I finally went out yesterday to a spot that I had some strange occurrences at over the past few years. The last incident was earlier this spring and I was on the dead-end dirt road that ends at where I camped. I was driving down the road and saw sitting on a stump, a young attractive woman in her 20's in pioneer dress, doing cross-stitch. Just sitting there, 5 yards off the road, smiling. She didn't even look up or glance at me as I drove by. It's like she didn't even know I was there. I drove on down the road to the dead-end, searched for mushrooms for about a half-hour, then drove back out. She was gone. No vehicles around for miles. Just weird. This is the spot... A couple of other times while hunting for mushrooms, I have gotten that creepy feeling of being watched. And my dogs have always stopped and stared at one particular area of the hillside for no apparent reason. So, I decided to actually spend the night there with just my dog and a few firearms. I brought my "new" ATV in a utility trailer, and I also have a tent designed for the back of a pickup that sort of fits in the trailer. I stayed up later than I wanted to, and was waken up every 45 minutes or so by my dog growling or barking at something. He's a city dog, so is freaked out by cows. I give little credence to his alerts when in the woods, lol. But, a couple of times, there were sounds that I managed to record. One was clearly an owl of some sort with a louder and deeper "whooo" and the other was likely a smaller predator. Sounded like an odd bird at first, but then I recalled hearing similar sounds made by cougars and bobcats. I'll have to enhance the audio to pin down what it was. I heard my first definite tree knock at around midnight. Not recorded, of course. And I heard a tree being pushed over. Also not recorded, but I have no doubt that it was pushed over. I discussed why in the video I recorded today, and will have to get it put together and posted on YT. I have been camping many times in the woods and have never heard so many sounds. Maybe because there was absolutely no wind and I didn't have the radio on, nor was I talking to anyone. I simply sat there by the fire and listened.
    1 point
  6. I actually went out yesterday to a spot that I had some strange occurrences at over the past few years. The last incident was earlier this spring and I was on the dead-end dirt road that ends at where I camped. I was driving down the road and saw sitting on a stump, a young attractive woman in her 20's in pioneer dress, doing cross-stitch. Just sitting there, 5 yards off the road, smiling. She didn't even look up or glance at me as I drove by. It's like she didn't even know I was there. I drove on down the road to the dead-end, searched for mushrooms for about a half-hour, then drove back out. She was gone. No vehicles around for miles. Just weird. This is the spot... A couple of other times while hunting for mushrooms, I have gotten that creepy feeling of being watched. And my dogs have always stopped and stared at one particular area of the hillside for no apparent reason. So, I have heard of BF being associated with haunted areas and other paranormal activities. My own limited experiences bear that out. And last night I heard my first tree knock, my first tree being pushed over, a distant whoop, and maybe one imitating an animal sound. I'll have to review the video and enhance the audio. Pretty exciting night!
    1 point
  7. Dr. Mathew Johnson, psychiatrist in Washington states, states one paranormal form of bigfoot called the Xanue is always out of focus when photographed. What is the science connected to this stunt?
    1 point
  8. You are embarrassing yourself over this matter. It’s ok to admit you were wrong. Really, no one believes you are infallible, I promise.
    1 point
  9. The space force is an interesting topic by itself full of woo or the paranormal. If Sasquatch has sight, hearing, and detecting scent that is five times better than humans, this is exceptional but not paranormal. When does scent detecting become paranormal? If Sasquatch can detect the scent of a human during a windless day in the forest 300 feet away this ability might be normal for this primate. If BF can smell humans 2000 feet away on a calm day, this becomes paranormal in my opinion. What's your viewpoint? Sasquatch might be about a basic primate that has keen senses, forest survival intelligence and enough physical power to defeat bears but not paranormal. This physical power has enabled BF from becoming extinct early on. Woo or paranormal attributes may not be in Sasquatchs' bag of tricks reported by hikers, hunter, or campers. Its bag of tricks includes ambushing or chasing down speeding animals, jumping straight up 14' to pick off a critter in a tree for lunch, or throwing a volley ball sized rock 50' to knock out a deer or bear. These attributes seem paranormal but are normal for our forest primate. The other theory is about a supernatural primate that might have paranormal attributes such as cloaking or becoming invisable at will. Some believe or claim that Bigfoot or BF cloaks.
    1 point
  10. It’s not a technicality, you’re wrong. NASA is not a military branch as you clearly stated above. Double down all you want, won’t change reality. From the Nasa website: Mission: NASA explores the unknown in air and space, innovates for the benefit of humanity, and inspires the world through discovery. Exploration, not defense.
    1 point
  11. Or maybe they don't know exactly what the hell they are and know about as much as any researcher does . Best course of action to find out is take one down...that's it that's the answer to the question and norseman has the right approach to the answer . People on this board who claim they have visuals never seem to produce anything but posts making the claim. When asked they say they don't care and they just research the creatures for themselves . Fine I guess but why keep telling other members you keep have these Extraordinary encounters on a Bigfoot board and then never want to produce any evidence to the members when asked .....
    1 point
  12. Then you might get some off-the-cuff scuttlebut, but that will be about as useful as a blurry pic.
    1 point
  13. 1 point
  14. Greetings all! I'm Red from the rural countryside in Oklahoma. Was pointed in this direction. Currently live in the tall grass prairie where my cattle rancher neighbor swears he's seen timber-wolves on multiple occasions. I am about to move into a woods in the neighboring county/nation next to a river known for sasquatch activity (seems like seasonal migrations). I do plan to start recording and analyzing audio data that I will capture overnights in those woods (I'm after coyotes...and wolves). I'm starting an account here in case anything turns up and I need an outlet to pass along findings/information. There is a sacred native site very near this land and it is not far from known hotspots and plenty of countryside. I live an off grid lifestyle and share crop/farmhand for an old man as well as raise game meats. Fun stuff.
    1 point
  15. A bit naive, but that's okay If someone want's to believe what the gov says then who am I to say. USFW also says it protects, enhances, and ensures the existence and well being of animals and their habitats for the American people. So does it? It supposedly doesn't have a Sasquatch under it's jurisdiction, however. Is that because the beast, and therefore its "woo-woo" doesn't exist beyond being a public recreational activity? Because if one believes THAT then may as well shut the Forum down for perpetuating a myth. But if one DOESN'T believe what the government says then just where does one draw the line on whether one is being told the truth? About Bigfoot or anything else? Finding out the truth about Bigfoot ain't easy. Especially when the "yes/no" coin is presumably not allowed to fall on one side or the other. Because for me? Heads or tails doesn't matter. Only the truth, either way, does.
    -1 points
  16. Page 8.... The two questions I have just asked goes to the very heart of this tread regarding "woo-woo." Because proof of existence would at least set one on the road to addressing that issue. Example: Has anyone ever asked Dr. Meldrum whether or not he has asked USFW about Sasquatch existence. How about Dr Disotell? Or Dr. Mayor? Or the Olympic Project? Or Loren Coleman? Or Matt Moneymaker and the entire BFRO organization? Does anyone think that any of these Bigfoot heavy-hitting influencers have ever bothered to ASK USFW for an answer on whether or not Sasquatch exists? These are hard questions folks but I can make it easy for everyone. NO, none of them have ever asked. And I'm ashamed of them. And what might that say about anyone's chances at getting to the bottom of proof? Or much less the "woo-woo"? Hmmm, does zero ring a bell? No one asks, therefore, no one knows...therefore, no one asks...therefore....................no one knows. So on, and so forth. Because looking at Meldrum, or anyone else for that matter, for any answers on existence ain't gonna help one bit. But fear not , folks, cause ol' hiflier, one of your very own, for better or for worse, has got the ball on this.
    -2 points
  17. Down voting the truth? This is not good to see. Because that's what I wrote. No guts, no glory. I mean, you know that USFW doesn't take you seriously, right? They consider going after Bigfoot to be only a "recreational activity". Does anyone think that "woo-woo" reports do anything to make that viewpoint any better? So to topic,: "How have the "woo-woo" reports affected your opinion?" My opinion of what? Bigfoot? The Bigfoot world? All "woo-woo" has done is embarrass the hell out of me as a researcher. Makes me ashamed to even be involved. Okay, I answered the topic's question. Norseman told me once a long time ago that my problem was that I was trying to be everyone's friend here. Now? I sugar coat nothing and spoon feed no one. Happy now?
    -2 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...