Leaderboard

I guess I'm not in the majority. I think bigfoot is flesh and blood hominid that is going extinct. I fear it may already be too late.

Too late...

Define off tracks. Asking for a friend:} Sorry

In a statement, but just a letter written by one representative or is this an official stance of the government?

I’m an idiot when it comes to court proceedings etc. Is there a point in the US courts where this gets thrown out and never heard on the basis of eliminating frivolous law suits? My question being, do they have a means of never hearing a case like this regarding BF, faeries, leprechauns, etc. Is there a threshold of “evidence” one would present, for lack of a better term, in a pre-trial? I can’t imagine any yahoo can get time in a court suing for any random reason. Does that question make sense? What’s the criteria to even be heard by an upper level court ?

My buddy got starlink. He says it’s absolutely worth it. He lived in an area with virtually no service. It’s changed his life at home.

They are not going extinct. They made it this far. Their food supply is very good: elk, deer, bear to name the common ones. They eat anything that walks or crawls. If the food supply crashes, then they are in trouble. Humans are safe--too much cholesterol and horse feathers. Hybridization would be painful. 7.62: "Can't go this long with the tools researchers have now at their disposal . ". The tools are what is pushing them away. I can't think of a wild animal that does not hide from man.

Elk pushed the deer out

What if you saw something that would convince you there might be something to the woo ... even if you didn't see a bigfoot That's the only thing that makes sense to me because if they are just an animal that roams the forests there would have been solid proof by now but there isn't . Can't go this long with the tools researchers have now at their disposal .

True enough. They are not fully extinct though, the whoops, knocks, and tracks continue ... Whether the population, while non-zero, is so low that they've passed a point of no return seems a fair question. It is one people can have an opinion about but there's no direct evidence either way, merely assumption. And as discussed before here, an extremely low population can lead to mutations that do not get "dampened out" as they would be in a large and mixing population, things like varying numbers of toes, variations in size, muscularity, blah blah blah. MIB

I would like to follow up my post by requesting that you carefully read what the judge in British Columbia said in his ruling against Todd Standing's Sasquatch case. When you do you will see how Todd Standing went horribly wrong in how he presented his argument to the court. In other words, he really messed up and after reading what the judge said you will easily see how Todd's case was so easily slapped aside. It's interesting that in the very first sentence we get to see how the court side-stepped itself from any responsibility for pursuing the existence issue itself, or issue a ruling that would compel the government to pursue the Sasquatch existence issue. Also the name Sasquatch in the ruling was never capitalized. It is also evident that Todd presented his case as some kind of personal matter which was a gross negligence on his part: https://macleans.ca/news/canada/what-british-columbias-supreme-court-said-about-sasquatch/ "While the court is clearly without jurisdiction to embark upon an independent investigation of scientific matters, the court is also without jurisdiction to order the government of British Columbia to expend funds to conduct particular scientific investigations of the flora and fauna of the Province. In the case at bar, there is no overt exercise of provincial control over the plaintiff; inaction — in the sense of the Province not recognizing the existence of the sasquatch — is by no means an exertion of control over the plaintiff on the facts of this case. The plaintiff has not been prohibited by the Province from sharing his beliefs regarding the existence of the sasquatch, or from any other action. No facts have been pleaded that amount to “treatment” as described in Rodgriguez (sic), let alone “punishment” that would outrage standards of decency. Rather, bare assertions of a violation are made without reference to any prohibition or act of control. The conclusion that state action has not created a distinction as against the plaintiff is sufficient to be the end of the matter. However, I further do not find “political or other beliefs” as pleaded to constitute analogous grounds of distinction on consideration of the facts of this particular case. … A belief in the existence of the sasquatch is not an immutable personal characteristic. First, there is no political belief at issue here; Mr. Standing’s belief in the sasquatch’s existence is not a political matter. Second, such belief is not akin to “constructively immutable” grounds like religion. Where religion can be an element core to a person’s state of being in all aspects of life, the same cannot be said of a belief in the existence of the sasquatch." I'll be starting a new thread to go into this a little deeper.

IMO here are the possibilities. 1). Flesh and blood. Extremely small population, say in the hundreds. 95% or more reports are false or misidentification. 2). Flesh and blood with some natural ability that allows it to avoid detection. IR. Infrasound, ability to see major light spectrum, amazing smell etc. basically a true ninja of the woods. Probably 50% of reports are false or misidentification. 3). Some completely alien / woo woo filled creature/intelligent being that can plane shift, go invisible etc. 95% of reports could be both true and/or Bigfoot trolling us humans for entertainment. What day of the week it is determines what I believe. The only thing I KNOW is that I know nothing. I’m most likely more wrong on every thought than I am right. 🤷🏻🤷🏻🤷🏻

I addressed this several times. The latest on page 5. Cave in’s could be possible with a large animal jumping around in there. Yes. (Or attempted escape) Therefore the pit would have to be constantly monitored. A metal insert serving as a ready made cage would be ideal. Except for the need for the use of large helicopter. 144” x 20 ft = 6860 lbs (check my math) https://www.txcorr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2014/10/CMP-DETAIL-SHEET2.pdf

Who cares!? just joking I think they are genetically altered primates, similar to the altercations that made Us 'human', yet very different. Who or what altered them and Us, I don't know. In our case, there were sudden and extreme advancements in our abilities about 12,500 years ago (after the last Younger Dryas) from hunter/gatherer to farmer/astronomer that cannot be explained without advanced intervention. Same with Bigfoot; except for building sky scrapers and walking on the moon, their abilities apparently include surviving in the woods without being 'discovered' via Ninja skills such as easily traversing in thick woods and perhaps blocking electromagnetism. There are too many failed attempts to categorize them as 'just another Ape', imo.