Leaderboard

Good replies. It would be great to protect bigfoot from hunters and Bigfoot may be compatible with logging. What is the procedure for getting a species listed as endangered? https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ESA-Section-4-Listing.pdf Here are some highlights: "The ESA requires that we make and publish specific findings on a petition. We or the NMFS (for most marine species) are required to make a finding within 90 days of receiving a petition (to the extent practicable) as to whether there is “substantial information” indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted." "What are the criteria for deciding whether to add a species to the list? A species is added to the list when it is determined to be an endangered or threatened species because of any of the following factors: A. the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms: reply: the inadequacy of laws protecting bigfoot and its home site are inadequate. B. other natural or manmade factors affecting its survival: reply: the inadequacy of laws protecting bigfoot and its home site are inadequate. We need a PHD biologist to write up the report so it can be submitted. Any ideas?

"NO! We need that guy!" says hiflier from the witness stand, whom is promptly held in contempt and removed from the courtroom in irons, LOL

I am gonna start calling you two the H and H law firm….. So when do you guys expect to go to trial?

Huh? Is somebody saying something? Hell, I need new glasses.........

I think ya'll are grasping at straws you only imagine exist. Trying to talk others into spending their money instead of you spending yours .. well, good luck with that.

Yes, they did. But they did not sue under the provisions of the ESA and the agency's lack of investigation into the status of the species. They sued to demand admission of existence. A suit under the ESA is a demand to study endangerment status. It is more than obvious that either government has not looked into the phenomenon (doubtful), or they refuse to comment on it in any other than a mockingly way (more than obviously so). Thus, when private sasquatch researchers present their evidence of a dangerously low population (easily done), and the agency replies with "But they don't exist" (which they obviously will), the obvious line of questioning goes thusly: 1) "Do you have any documented study establishing your claim of non-existence?" 2) "How can you state non-existence when the plaintiffs have all this documented evidence of both existence and low population, both based upon commonly accepted wildlife management principles and evidentiary rules of the court, and you have brought nothing but opinion." 3) "How can you refuse the demand of remedy, which is that you study and document a status of endangered or not, in accordance with the ESA, since you have admitted right here that you have conducted no study on the species whatsoever, even to establish your claim of non-existence, which is itself an admittance of endangerment if they ever even existed in the past?"

“Only 2 photos” is Fake News. This very link you have posted from 2007 has always had the entire set simply try scrolling down the page. This is a prime example of not properly looking at the evidence and you’re not alone it’s common among so called “Bigfoot experts”.

https://popular-archaeology.com/article/new-ancient-ape-from-turkiye-challenges-the-story-of-human-origins/ Neat, Turkey and the Balkans and the whole Black Sea area is an absolutely fascinating part of the world, the history is unbelievable. I went there several times for business and always made it a point to take extra time off to explore. The crossroads of the world, but if you go there keep your wits about you and mind your P’s & Q’s, not the place to get in trouble.

Just food for thought; The above is the range of black bears in 1995. Below is their historic range. Imagine what the past 500 years has done to historic sasquatch range…….

No telling what our ancient ancestors were up to but it’s safe to assume they were just as licentious as modern humans.

That is as it should be. If we (forum members) know, then "the powers dat be" know. And if they know, it doesn't matter what lengths you went to, your efforts are futile, pre-failed, because they've anticipated those efforts and prepared for them. If you keep them to yourself rather than boast about them, you just might sneak something past the goal post before they realize you're in motion. Do you not understand this?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patterson–Gimlin_film