Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/03/2023 in all areas
-
The heck he isn’t, I met him when I became a Shellback. He arose out of the sea and was even piped aboard: King Neptune and his Royal Court, arriving…. Curiously he looked like one of our old Chiefs with a fake beard. 😉3 points
-
I haven’t seen this in any books but I have seen this on the internet before. Yes he spun yarns, he was a bold daring man and natural leader known for his good nature and playing practical jokes and would tell stories around the campfire at night to keep his men motivated. When he was leading a group of salt makers during the Revolutionary War and got captured by the Shawnee (no laughing matter due to their penchant for burning prisoners at the stake) he kept it up and gained his captor’s respect to the point that they refused all offers from the British to buy him and their chief adopted him as a son.2 points
-
so your stance is because they did not say “Bigfoot does not exist” they are on the hook? Come on! That’s like 3rd grade logic. The government does not acknowledge the existence of BF. Them saying it is a recreational activity is their way of NOT saying we are out here chasing imaginary creatures like fools. Stop with the idea this is some “got ya”. This isn’t. You have posted umpteen times about it, You have nothing, they are not in a corner. Move on. In 8 months you’ll be on to some new “method”, you’ll be claiming we are complacent, and I’ll be proverbially slapping you again. Goodness can we quit the cycle ???? ***slap****2 points
-
2 points
-
"Regardless of our enduring enthusiasm, without a Linnaeus taxonomy listing, we are not going to see an ESA listing", said Catmandoo. Back in Linnaeus's time a body was needed, but today we can prove bigfoot exists without a body. Let's name some ways to prove bigfoot exists with the tools science provides. Science has come a longways since Linnaeus's time. One video like the Patterson/Gimlin film should have motivated the federal Fish and Wildlife department long ago. They should have been gathering bigfoot data for many, many years now. It's their **** job that pays $100 per hour to go about collecting bigfoot's hair and and $125 per hour to collect its poop. The political wing of government has overruled the scientific wing. Will timber money go to pot or way down if bigfoot is proven to live in productive forest? You tell us how this will happen. We want the fuc...ing truth to be known...... it's the law. Bigfoot is out there. Around 1980 one snuck up on our night camp and was watching us......... for a snack? It's our biologists' job to warn the public, find, and document bigfoot or fire their butts along with their bosses. As Hiflier has stated, bigfoot's DNA can be extracted from downstream water if bigfoot lives up stream. Who but the Fish and Wildlife department has the bucks to spend lots of time and money on this project? Build a fire under their butts to get to work or else.......... bye, bye to a cushy job.1 point
-
Bold of you to assume I do nothing. Just because I do not pontificate on the forums about my ideas. Notice I said ideas and not actions. As you admitted, your last year long song and dance about E-DNA has resulted in 0, yes 0 E-DNA tests from you. Yet you chastise the forum for not participating……. I have a new camping rig. I’ve done multiple trips up into the upper parts of the LP of Michigan. I have done 7 days in Michigans upper UP. I have been out there. I just don’t post and pontificate to others to do the same. ***NOTE****. If I operated as Hiflier did, I’d be on here each day chastising the forum for not having boots on the ground each opportunity available. In every thread I post in. I’d be upset that EVERYONE is not out doing what it takes to document BF. Being where BF could potentially be!! I’d even go as far to chastise him for being lazy and just writing and suing the government to do my/our job for us. Let’s not discover BF ourselves, but convince our honest government to tell us about it!!!1 point
-
Book: "Beware of the Woods Scary True Stories of the Unexplained" Author: Tony Urban I recently finished reading this book. It shares short stories of alleged eye-witness testimony of various creatures, moreso Bigfoot. I am aware that eye-witness testimony and memory recall is scientifically unreliable; however, the book provided enjoyment and intrigue. I find this stuff fascinating and like to keep an open mind whilst thinking critically. Happy reading!1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Fear is never boring............ This thread has accumulated 17 pages. Wow. I looked it over and personally call the style 'circular continuum'. The ESA started in 1973 and requires a 'species' to work with. Regardless of our enduring enthusiasm, without a Linnaeus taxonomy listing, we are not going to see an ESA listing. The hypothetical fictional courtroom jargon in this thread goes no where. Bailiff, ................. Please continue when our cousin in the genus homo has a legal description.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Ive had it happen to me and they knew I was a human. I was standing on my ranch. Its not a great feeling. But when you point a rifle back at them they suddenly lose interest…..🤣1 point
-
I wear an orange hat, orange plaid shirt, orange thermal top and an orange vest if I have to wear a coat, as all my coats are camo, so the vest and the hat come into play more so. I used to wear just camo, but from time to time I would find myself looking through binos at someone looking at me though their scope on their rifles. Yikes! I started wearing orange and that never happened again.1 point
-
Well done book by researcher Red Grossinger, who has a highly systematized approach. Reminds me of Thomas Steenberg in thoughoughness. https://www.amazon.ca/Nahganne-Northern-Sasquatch-Red-Grossinger/dp/1988824591 Nahganne: Tales of the Northern Sasquatch Paperback – Oct. 1 2022 by Red Grossinger (Author), Raymond Yakeleya (Foreword), Rich Theroux (Illustrator) 4.6 out of 5 stars 3 ratings1 point
-
1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00