Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/05/2024 in all areas

  1. Because nobody has the power to change it. There's an old saying that you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink. This is especially true when that horse is government.
    1 point
  2. I mostly agree. Apathy and dismissiveness plays a huge part in this. But there is also an intentional decision not to take this thing up. Nothing else explains the official reaction to the PGF by the state of California and National Forest Service. Nothing. They know, and they've been completely silent about that film for half a century.
    1 point
  3. Some folks believe that some measure of concern is appropriate. It doesn’t have to be an effort like the Space Race. Like, maybe, data collection, even if it’s not sought…….like when terrified people come in to your office. I know of two cases in Washington state when different sheriffs were contacted and they investigated. In both cases deputies casted footprints and kept them for evidence. No hiding, no lies, just the response that they’re there for. But no. Nothing. Zip. Nada. Nyet. Or so we’re told…….. If government investigated and found that just five cases of the thousands of Sasquatch reports were actual sasquatches, guess what that would mean? But they don’t investigate, do they? There’s no widespread (compelling, convincing, undeniable, convincing, irrefutable, etc) evidence that sasquatches exist. So we don’t need to investigate.
    1 point
  4. The reason so much money is spent on water is the massive level of importance of the need for water. Bigfoot doesn't have this same level of concern. 100% true. If any of these agencies were in the area of wildlife concern, I think it's likely they would be concerned. Some in the group would take it more seriously than others. I do think any part of our government in the area whose job or mission related directly or near directly to wildlife would care. Could mean there is something to it or it might not. I would rather they took it seriously and recorded a report. If they didn't it may not mean anything. Actual investigation in my state showed there were 5 cases of voter fraud out of 100'000s of votes case in a state with 3 million people. While it technically existed, it was so rare that more people died from coconuts hitting them on the head that cases of voter fraud. 3 of those 5 were previous felons who were told their vote had been restored. That means really there were only 2 intentional fraudulent voting attempts. The election was not only not rigged but those who continue to perpetuate the myth somewhat are rigging the perception. They must be doing this to satisfy those who need to believe it. When it comes to matter of truth look at one is willing to present to a court and enter as evidence to a court. Don't go on what they will say on the courthouse steps where they have no obligation to be truthful outside of a court session.
    1 point
  5. Hello, I am a current Biology student. During a camping trip with friends we bumped into what we believe to be Bigfoot last night. I never believed in this sort of thing, so to have a run in like that has certainly enthused me. I'm here to reach out and hopefully meet people sharing similar experiences to my own, or hell, even to get this off my chest and be around people who wont regard me as crazy.
    1 point
  6. Yup. Their focus is water conservation, and government has expended $billions on their research, regulatory, and enforcement activities. Toilet flushing. Absolutely critical, no? Much more important than the potential death of another Homo species, right? Yup, again; the toilet flushing scientists and police don't likely get calls from people who had a sasquatch cross the road in front of them, and if they did, my bet is that they're still laughing about it. They don't care. I also doubt that they would even try to refer that call to a more appropriate government agent. But what about the USFS? USFWS? NPS? Natural Resource Officer on Ft. Lewis? Sheriff's Department of Grey's County, Washington? Alaska Department of Fish and Game? And if ADFG gets a call, does it come in to the Director's office, or the local Area Biologist of GMU 2 in the locality of the sighting? We don't know, even though we know that the call was made........because we were the one making the call. We don't know because, we're told, they don't keep records on the issue..........at all. Zip. Nothing. Nada. Nyet. All you get is a wry smile with the vague replies. It's sorta' like the reply that, "There's no evidence of widespread voter fraud!" even as you know that there's no need for voter fraud to be "widespread" in order to throw an election. But that doesn't mean that there wasn't voter fraud, and it doesn't mean that the election wasn't effectively rigged.
    1 point
  7. Hey everyone! My name is Jeremy and I’m from Kentucky, although I’ve never had what I can call a Bigfoot encounter myself. I’ve always found the subject fascinating, I just wanted to connect with others on the topic and I’m just interested to read everyone’s stories/posts.
    1 point
  8. Just came across it this evening, half way through it now.
    1 point
  9. This ^^^ hands down, has got to be the worst post I've ever read.
    -1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...