Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/28/2024 in all areas

  1. Is this a general post for everybody and your stuff? It is possible to scale targets in your images before and after an event. If you send your image(s) out for forensic analysis, the EXIF data may give up your location via GPS coordinates. There is software available to remove your GPS location and even add a spoof location like Area 51 or Wrigley Field. 1060 W. Addiston St. is a proven decoy location.
    2 points
  2. Heard this one before....Be careful not to make promises you can't keep. However if this is serious and not an attempt at humor, then I would think you would send a copy to legitimate researchers for their opinion first. That way if it is not what you claim/may think it is, you save time and embarrassment. Once you have gotten a few responses or after a reasonable time, then release it on Youtube, here, and other related forums for opinion. Then sit back and take your lumps.
    2 points
  3. Looked Vator up here on the forum. Seems like he is only mentioned in one other thread briefly. The thought then was that he was a hoaxer. At best his reputation is questionable. Here is another commentator on the video (the BF part starts about 5:45 in):
    1 point
  4. With regard to photography, forensic analysis is an area of expertise (and perhaps the only one) that applies to purported photos of sasquatches, and there are actually many forensic analysts out there both currently working and retired. Their ideological foundation is in both Science and Law; they apply science in the pursuit of legal proof. Indeed, legal proof may be the *adjective* evidence needed at this point. Most other scientific fields are now fully subject to law and political science. For example, both biology and psychology in the theater of human gender have become (or, more accurately, 'rendered themselves') irrelevant to law and political science. A legal decision that sasquatches exist in a particular photograph may be all the "proof" one needs to ascertain existence.
    1 point
  5. With the possible exception of Bigfoot history and lore, I do not believe there to be any Bigfoot experts period (yet). As you stated though, many claim to be. Who and what can be trusted in this field………find you history/lore expert and you’re probably in for a dysfunctional ride regrading this subject! However there are experts in fields that do/could pertain to Bigfoot research and discovery. Taxonomy experts Iconography experts Zoologists etc…..
    1 point
  6. First-hand accounts such as that are exactly why "I Believe". Thanks for posting that Tucky Buzzard and welcome back!
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...