Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/11/2024 in all areas

  1. I say i think they're doing alright as the sightings and evidence keep coming. I would think the things you mentioned would impact them a bit. But i would think they are fairly adaptable and do migrate to better areas for food and cover. Perhaps, if others act as this one Native lady does, they find forest on restricted Tribal lands to be the best refuge as they know "hunters" are not welcome. And if they are pretty much left alone by the indigenous peoples...it'd be ideal.
    1 point
  2. Keep an eye out for Predators. Seriously, the terrain could be a caldera / meteor strike hole. And when Mazama blew up, all kinds of chaos rained down on Oregon. For mineral prospecting I purchased maps for geology, gravity anomalies and magnetic anomalies. There is a magnetic reversal location in the Cascades of Washington. Gravity is not a constant value. No, we are not going to float away.......yet. The easiest gravity anomaly to post here is about sea mounts in the ocean. Satellites that measure sea surface height have determined that sea surface height above sea mounts is lower than surrounding areas. Gravity influences sea surface height close to shore also. My point is that when we assume that we are in a 'normal' constant environment, we can encounter 'high weirdness'. There is no such thing as a routine hike. Analog is good. Trail marking can be laid out with relatively cheap surveyor tape. If you are green, biodegradable surveyor tape is available. Between Washington and Oregon, I am not sure what area has more high weirdness. Mt. Baker has Jurassic era rocks.
    1 point
  3. I had both GPS and compass fail at the same time one day. Inexplicable to me. Neither would find north, the needle / icon just spun. I was in a new-to-me (then) part of a basin / shallow cirque 5-7 miles across ringed by higher peaks .. and that moment, that day, the peaks were all obscured by a cloud deck that had settled to below rim level which was maybe 1000 feet above me. THAT has not happened there again but I do seem to miss my intended travel route surprisingly often there whether I'm traveling by dead reckoning or gps.
    1 point
  4. Barring a skilled pal to show you some ropes, a good place to start if inclined to venture out is a book on basic wilderness navigating with map and compass (learn about local declination), spend a bit of time practicing in an open field, park or somewhere known. Then pick up a good topo or DeLorme gazetteer for your area/state and find a suitable locale for investigating. If you can find a "boxed" region between a lake/pond, mountain or woods road to explore, knowing that if you become disoriented you walk to the perimeter-- lake which you know is E or the mountain/hill base you know is W, or woods road looping around from N-S etc. I've often used this strategy bushwhacking up in the N ME woods, 5000 sq miles of desolate working forest, unmapped logging spurs that go nowhwere etc, if I get it wrong, I could be bushwhacking for days through swamps and balsam thicket, war zone of blowdowns. I started with just map and compass but when the woods are so thick, one can only take a bearing out to 50' -- there is a lot of room for error, and I've made them, great fun, 10 minutes of really knowing you're alive-- til re-oriented! I've wised up in my old age, carry a back-up gps and plb now. I don't rely on the former and prefer NEVER to use the latter. But for starting out, that tech is good reassurance, maybe enough to override concerns and get out there, just don't get lazy with learning the basic skills and become reliant on battery powered gizmos. Good luck, have fun, stay out of the news! https://www.exotac.com/products/essential-wilderness-navigation-a-real-world-guide-to-finding-your-way-safely-in-the-woods-with-or-without-a-map-compass-or-gps https://www.mhprofessional.com/the-essential-wilderness-navigator-how-to-find-your-way-in-the-great-outdoors-second-edition-9780071361101-usa
    1 point
  5. I am not comparing Sasquatches to Gorillas in any way other than endangered species being pulled back from the brink of extinction because of public support. I could have used a Grizzly Bear instead or a “save the whales” campaign. The point is is that cryptids don’t get funding or land set aside for them. Real endangered species in recent times do!
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...