Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/03/2024 in all areas

  1. Can't help you with books or movies, and can't tell you when i'll be finished, but i'm working on the long term Olympic Project Nest Area Recording Project which now has over 1,000 combined vocalization and percussive recordings from around 3 years now, that don't appear to belong to any known animal. I'm/We're also collecting localized actual visual sightings from that general area of which many aren't via the normal public ways that we gets reports for the SSR, and i truly believe that the general area there will soon enough provide something decent in way of a pic/video hopefully. Life and bills are right now slowing me down more than i want and that can't be helped, but imo and i appreciate i'm being a little vague here, this project and what it's appearing to yield, is keeping my head in the game, no doubt.
    4 points
  2. Timothy Treadwell was also a victim. He had fallen prey to environmental propaganda and his own ridiculous fantasies. He was clearly mentally ill. Yet Superintendent Williams was actually quoted in the Anchorage Daily News as actually supporting "his message" that he brought to elementary and secondary schools along with videos of his deadly antics with the bears. She belongs in prison, or fired upon initial investigation, but she actually ended up promoted to a senior position in the Dept. of the Interior............remarkabky similar to the Lyle Laverty story in upward mobility, except no sasquatches have killed anybody as a result of Laverty's failures. He just never pushed his knowledge of sasquatchery within the agency............that we know of......... https://ballotpedia.org/Deborah_L._Williams
    1 point
  3. 1 point
  4. All 'bark' no bite: This idea of broken or bent branches assumes Bigfoot bends tree branches or break tree branches. Otherwise, we really don't care. We can come up with some reason why Bigfoot might bend branches. Maybe some sort of marking of a territory. Who knows? I don't find the idea of any bend or broken branches any big deal and very unlikely to be Bigfoot. Some find what they might call 'nests' and other shelters in the woods. Clearly these can't be a bear or heavy snow breaking tree branches. Something resembling a nest and especially a shelter cannot be random or natural. It's not the wind. Something made it happen by some intent at least in the case of shelters and nests. Even with this, why are these necessary to attribute to bigfoot? Finding: Reason: Broken Branches Natural occurrence like animals or wind or snow Shelter People for reasons of their own making a fort or crude shelter. Depressions in the sticks or grass Known animals like Deer and so on lying down (see Slocum imprint) Why do we need to attribute broken branches as a Bigfoot trait? Why do we assume Bigfoot might need to make a nest or shelter? Isn't it more likely what we see is something made or caused by human's vs Bigfoot. Sure, I will admit if Bigfoot exists it has to live somewhere. It has to eat something. It has to live or sleep somewhere. Should bigfoot exist I can more buy the idea of some pile of bush or crude depression in the grass is a place bigfoot might sleep vs the need to break branches. I need a really good reason to believe bigfoot would do these. I say these tree branches are either snow, people, or bears or whatever. Anything BUT bigfoot. I am here Iowa. I have a pine tree right now with some broken branches from heavy snow over the winter. If this occurs here, I am guessing it occurs other places in the world as well even places thought to be bigfoot country.
    0 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...