Leaderboard

The problem with Giganto itself is science doesn’t agree on what it is. It wasn’t close to an orangutan in morphology or behavior. It didn’t live in the tree tops. It was terrestrial. But was it bipedal? We don’t know. What did its feet look like? We don’t know. But! It’s definitely the right ape, at the right time in the right place. If it’s a large hairy biped. We don’t have an ape man or hominid in East Asia that fits the description of Bigfoot in recent history. We are finding new species all the time that seem to be some spin off of Homo Erectus. Which used fire and flaked stone tools. So if Bigfoot comes from an Asian Homo Erectus lineage? There is a lot of regression apparently from modern reports. A supposed encounter between a quadraped depicted Giganto and Homo Erectus in Asia.

Just seeing this now, haven't been around here much, Life has just been busy. I personally am **** glad Dr. Meldrum does what he does, and I'm thankful for it. Guy knows what he's talking about, and he's got skin in the game. I've learned a lot from his lectures and book. I think he's done a heck of a lot for sasquatch research and general bigfootery.

I like, and respect Dr. Meldrum. I have had several conversations with him over the last five years. His mind is razor sharp, and his ability to evaluate evidence and apply what he knows rivals the best detectives I ever worked with. That said...as some are asserting that he "sounds like a broken record" on the various podcasts he is invited to appear on...remember he is being asked the same questions over and over and over again. The fact that his answers remain the same is consistency in testimony. It also must be considered that new, or revolutionary evidence is extremely slow in coming, so what does he really have to comment on other than a relatively few new footprints that have come to him that are of a high enough quality to actually examine forensically? He is one of the very, very few researchers of any real high profile who remains committed to common sense, logic, reason, and the scientific method in his approach to the subject. He sticks to what he knows, and is the first to admit what he doesn't know. I give him a lot of credit for that.