Leaderboard

Crazy footprint Q: This isn't necessarily a "Snow" Q but a dermal ridge Q on footprints. It seems Jimmy Chilcutt (spelling?) the Police fingerprint expert used to be on TV a lot telling some of the tracks (plaster) were proof of Bigfoot. He identified lines and so on in the plaster where he said are proof of Bigfoot. Essentially, he would stake his reputation on that Bigfoot existed. Later I have read these fingerprint-plaster-cast-effect are reproducible. When this was tested this was just from casting plaster prints highly suggesting the FBI guy was wrong. It's possible he was interpreting was just a normal anomaly. I think those findings questioning Chilcutt were presented at some Bigfoot conference. Back to my Q's which is more like one big question: 1- Is Chilcutt still around making those claims? 2- Has his position largely been debunked (limited to the lines on the plaster) ? 3- Has the Bigfoot community largely rejected Chilcutt's position (if it's still his position) or it this still the position in the Bigfoot community generally? That is, do Meldrum and other scientists in the pro-bigfoot community support Chilcutt's position? 4- Was there a presentation at any Bigfoot conference where the "Footprints are Normal" presentation? it doesn't matter to me if Chilcutt got it wrong as it doesn't change what is on the PGF and eye witness reports. I just wondered what the updated position on his viewpoint might be.