Leaderboard

Quote from the BFRO link, bold mine. The points above I pulled out are all good, common-sense and logical. We are talking about thirty years ago. Perhaps the youngest the witness could be at this time is around 70, likely more. Ron's been in many interviews, I remember him once saying that the witness later moved away.

The BFRO refers to this as the "Northwest 911 Call" and says the recording is available on Ron Morehead's bigfoot recordings CD. (https://www.bfro.net/avevid/sierrasounds/911.asp) On Morehead's website the description of the recording is confusing at best. The site says, "On Track 10, Ron placed an emergency 911 call that is completely unrelated to the story but nevertheless it provides the listener with a live eyewitness account of an actual sighting." ... which sounds like Ron heard the story and then faked a 911 call to dramatize it?? This is news to me. If I'm reading this right, that voice we hear on the 911 call is Ron Morehead pretending to be the witness he and Peter Byrne interviewed. It's a sketchy thing to do, in my opinion. Judge for yourself: https://ronmorehead.com/about-bigfoot-recordings/ Someone please correct me if this is inaccurate. Gotta say, though, the 911 caller sounds similar to Morehead.

^^^^^ This is my point in asking the Question starting the thread. If this is an authentic 911 tape/ recording it is a pretty amazing thing to consider. If it is not, we need to know. If someone is portraying a transcript of such a recording it needs to be made very clear this is a RECREATION or a DRAUMITIZATION of some report. Even then, we should find the person who called (recreation or not) and further document their story behind the events which lead up to the call. If it is real 911 call it should leave traces for us to find out more about the incident. I'm just trying to find out the truth. Thanks again for posting. If this Bigfoot call is bogus, we lose credibility if we promote it as authentic.