Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/19/2010 in all areas

  1. More than proven? Just how does that occur? Is that like bearing twins is "more than" pregnant? It is "more than" remarkable to me that I'm debating with people who have no command of the language whatsoever, yet who believe themselves to be so very intelligent scientifically. The silliness with regard to the words "evidence" and "proof", for example (even with people like law enforcement officers), has become "more than" tiresome. I must wonder if this is intentional or if people really have difficulty understanding such simple words?
    1 point
  2. Actually Kit's methods have been greatly and legitimately questioned. Some might even say he has an agenda in disporving the PGF, but as I so diligently said before, some of us go what our own experience, and the PGF really just isn't that important. Kit will fail miserably if he truly believes disproving the PGF will deraill all of footery. Some of his tripe comes off like his exit strategy is nothing more than make his movie, declare victory and claim that footery is bogus cuz he says so, "just watch my movie, you'll see" and the DJ-Skeptic will move on to his next obsession/project. Some predicted the same thing after Ray Wallace, Wallace was refuted as a p[rankster and huckster and life went on. Reports still come in, skeptics still try to debunk and enthusiasts still go out to look. What changed after that. Essentially nothing. Kit will fare no better.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...