Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/23/2014 in all areas

  1. True, But you will always have both voluble and entrenched extremes. Those who see bigfoot in everything and those who see bigfoot in nothing. Wise folks will filter out both extremes in favor of well-reasoned consideration.
    2 points
  2. Hello StevieStrangeGlove94, There's been discussion about whether the population of Sasquatch is too small to sustain itself even given the habitat and food abundance in the Lower 48. You bring up a good point. I'll add to it by saying that if the U.S. populations are constantly being resupplied by Sasquatch originating in Alaska then with such a large territory the supply of Sasquatch in the Lower 48 could be constantly replenished. If the Alaskan Sasquatch learn behavior from bears like the Browns and Kodiaks then they will be naturally suited for other areas.
    1 point
  3. I think the idea that shooting at a large, fleet, furtive, supremely adapted and non-stationary quarry in a heavily wooded environment like you find in S. OK can be compared to any other kind of hunting environment or quarry is fairly uninformed. When you add to this list of variables, "potentially lethal" and "most active at night", you really stretch the comparison. But let me try. Maybe hunting jaguar by torch light ? My guess is that might come close.
    1 point
  4. learned that apparently almost everyone here is an expert on seemingly everything from physics, to mathematics, videography, every species of animal behavior and anatomy, genetics, sociology, anthropology, science theory, bio diversity thermography.... just to name a few. must be the most intelligent forum on the web
    1 point
  5. Wow. Just...wow. Bobo and Matt should dress up as pretty cows. Problem solved. Bigfoot found.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...