Leaderboard

Well if a University gets it I hope it is somebody like Stanford, cause they are gonna have to rewrite the physiology, anatomy and physics textbooks, lol.

"A body?" Presented to whom? Have you, or the other prospective body snatchers made arrangements with a sanctioned lab and had them confirm in writing that they will in fact write and publish a complete report of their findings in a scientific publication after having it peer reviewed, and that they will take the necessary steps to have the "species" taxonomically classified ? Have you taken into account the possibility that the "body" submitted may be found to be a human that has simply not mentally developed to the "civilized" degree as that of the person(s) killing it? In that event, have you or they selected the criminal defense attorneys that will defend you for the actual killing and for the subsequent charges that would accrue after the "fight" against "whomever tried to take and hide it" because it would be the primary evidence in a criminal trial?. Obviously you agree with the assertion that "A body would end the debate forever,," because it was made as a statement of fact by yourself, and not as a second-hand opinion of belief expressed by others, and posted here "with no commentary of your own to the contrary". Without a doubt, "That's your own assertion going on, unless you provide some sort of proof to back it up." "Did YOU ask the people who told you this (A body would end the debate forever--) how exactly it was suppose to work"? So, as the Ole Granny asked. "Where the beef?"

Still assert that the scientific community's assiduous skepticism regarding extant hominids is based on prejudicial perspectives held over from the universal cultural superstitions established prior to 1000 AD in Europe. Once cast as supernatural to support the dominant cultural perspective that among manlike beings, only man is natural and good; other purportedly manlike beings were by contrast, and by definition, evil as well as supernatural. By extension, those who encountered such extant hominids came into contact with evil, and must be suspected of either attracting, inviting, or being under the influence of evil. Today, the scientific community's prevailing attitude carries over these superstitions and prejudices. Extant hominids have long been considered supernatural, therefore they cannot and do not exist in reality according to accepted scientific BELIEF. Modern witnesses are no longer viewed as tainted by evil, but are still VIEWED WITH CONTEMPT, and subjective skeptics, cloaked in prevailing scientific BELIEF, originating in SUPERSTITION extend this CONTEMPT to the body of evidence comprising all witness sightings. CONTEMPT and SCIENCE do not mix. CONTEMPT is an indicator of BELIEF, not TRUTH, and is an indicator of scientific PREJUDICE. PREJUDICE is not OBJECTIVE. PREJUDICE does not seek TRUTH. PREJUDICE seeks only to justify itself.

Here is post #17: I'm not seeing the atomic fracking in there.

Pteronarcyd, I believe the interpretation of this data to be flawed. Clearly black represents turtle.