Leaderboard

We're talking about the points raised in the OP. Do you wish to discuss them? There's no point simply repeating your claims of evidence that you spam over every thread and refuse to quantify or provide examples of. I really get quite sick and tired of you trying to turn everything into an argument between 'skeptics' and 'believers' about whether Bigfoot exists, without seemingly being able to consider an individual point on its own merits.

Right now, there is no evidence that they are threatened as a species and they have complete freedom. They have nothing to gain in terms of species survival and much to lose in terms of freedom.

I can tell you that you d be amazed where Bigfoot can be found. I d encourage any naysayers to get out there at night and figure it out for themselves. They have nothing to fear at night if there's nothing in the suburb woods so it should be a cake walk. Bring a good recorder to document the night if possible and then share your findings on this thread

He only has one post, it seems, which he repeats regardless of circumstances.

No, that wasn't what the OP said. It wasn't what the OP said in any shape or form. It's what YOU keep saying,, but it is not what the OP said. The OP strictly addressed numbers, bear populations, assumed sasquatch populations and land area. How on earth can you read it as saying what you claim it said? This is a rhetorical question as I know you will not attempt to answer it. But it's clear to anyone who reads the OP and then reads your supposed summary of it that the two bear no relation to one another at all.

Even the dogmen won't harm you unless you shoot. I would imagine that many who see them are more apt to shoot vs a big that has the face or the gaze of a man. The bigs won't harm you. At most they may scare you with their usual stuff of intimidation.