Leaderboard

What a sad and pathetic philosophy to live by: To declare verboten speech and ideas that may offend someone's delicate sensibilities or cause scientists to scoff! Advocating such a thing makes it clear that you are primarily interested in legitimizing the phenomenon and gaining the good graces of the establishment.Some people are completely comfortable (at least) considering ideas that seem outre, without the need to have those speculations validated or accepted by some authorative third party.

A Bigfoot Forum where proponents argue to KEEP the woo. How sad.