Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/07/2020 in all areas

  1. It is my opinion that Sykes has already made two major breakthroughs with the efforts he recorded in The Nature of the Beast. First, in his peer reviewed paper, he has established a population of unique bears in the Himalayas, and as an Alaskan, that alone is of extreme interest. He even outlined the dna traces of Ursus maritimus in the brown bears of the ABC Islands in southeast Alaska. Secondly, he has established mystery markers from Zanas progeny that can be used later to compare to other samples of promise. Rather than disappointment, I have been pleased with my purchase and consumption of The Nature of the Beast, especially since I no longer have to read opinions on his words. I get them verbatim.
    2 points
  2. And here I am, unable to see invisible bigfoot. I feel soooo inadequate.
    1 point
  3. There's a lot of fake documentation on the internet obviously. Bigfoot, UFOs, paranormal, are subjects that hoaxers deal with because it is easy to fool people. Whatever you read and using as a source of truth is a hoax. It probably links Carter because he is an easy hoax target since he admitted to seeing UFOs at least once. The second part of your argument with invisibility is far fetched but would be a good experiment. No one is going to invest in equipment based on a whim. If you make a big claim like an invisible Bigfoot then you need to provide a repeatable experiment. If you have audio clips, that's a good start.
    1 point
  4. Believe it or not, but if there was a written record on the internet of the U.S. Government stating that something that the U.S. Army declared as top secret, was in fact real and was in fact paranormal, then the CIA people that patrol the beat would promptly erase it. Obviously, they would erase the same if the U.S. Government stated that the Bigfoot are 24/7 F&B. So I could put the exact same demand back to you to provide a reference as proof that the U.S. Government stated that the Bigfoot are real and are in fact 24/7 F&B. You can't. As far as your little semantic game with quotes, prove that I am wrong. Provide a reference please. On a level playing field, you can't get away with making demands that you yourself can't also fulfill. Regardless of whether Carter clarified the truth or not, the Bigfoot can be proven as invisible when one gets the cahones to go call blasting by themselves in a non-confrontational fashion, and the Bigfoot walk right up to you while invisible. Which has happened to me on many occasions, day and night. I once spent several hours talking to an invisible Bigfoot during broad daylight, that had previously driven a salal picker running for his life from a nearby location. As long as you are a newbie and work in groups of similar minded enthusiasts, then you get to boast that you have never seen an invisible Bigfoot, because you haven't. The use of super high sensitivity microphones can also be used to listen to Bigfoot as they sneak in during broad daylight, to investigate you as you setup camp during the day. Because you will be able to see that there is nothing there. I have mentioned this several dozen times on the internet where hundreds of 24/7 F&B believers read it, and I will bet that not a one actually bought the equipment to test it out. Why? Because in the final analysis, they did not want to find proof that the Bigfoot are often if not normally, completely invisible.
    1 point
  5. Enclosing his statement in quotations indicates those are the precise spoken words. If you're going from 40 year old memory, why would you make it a quotation? Especially since you're evidently unable to link an actual proof of the event occurring. Listen, Carter once mentioned UFOs. One can find that event and actual quotations galore. You're claiming a bigfoot reference, with date and location, yet are unable to provide a link to the actual statement by the POTUS. Color me doubtful. Trying to give you the benefit of a doubt, but you're not very conducive to that. Just saying. Provide some proof to back your quoted statements, please. Otherwise, well yeah, cool story, bruh. Edit: I know you're new here, on BFF. Glad to have you. Yet you must understand we don't take unverified statements too seriously. I'm truly not trying to badger you, but your relying upon a 40 year old recollection doesn't cut it, either. As in the immortal words of Abe Lincoln, "You can't believe everything you see on the internet."
    1 point
  6. What a sweet pooch! It underscores how important it is to enjoy them every single moment they're in your life. May he live on for a long time Hiflier.
    1 point
  7. With a few years hindsight, I'm not seeing gold digging as Ketchum's goal in bigfootery. If anyone is to blame it is Erickson. It was his money. He should have hired correctly and run his operation as well as he has his businesses that made millions.
    1 point
  8. 1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...