Bill Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 (edited) Christopher: Then there may be more than one "full face video", because I am not incorrect. Time will tell. Bill added: My "source" is my own image stabilized work on HD footage. The footage I have stabilized and studied is a Chewbacca mask, with hair modified from the commercial mask versions. Edited February 15, 2012 by Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bipedal Ape Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 well there goes all of the erickson projects credibility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Maybe I'm being silly asking a question like that but if you are working on the Erickson project's video wouldn't you be under some sort of NDA so that you can't talk about it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 I don't think we should be hasty in judging what Mr. Erickson will finally release, because all indications i have are that he is sincere in his confidence that BF exists, and he is sincere in trying to prove it to be so. But each person who sets out to prove some truth of this issue must beware of fakes, because just as there are people who like to hoax friends, strangers, or the general public, there are also people who like to hoax researchers. So anyone producing a documentary about BF (not just Mr. Erickson) must be weary of material provided by others and must put it under intense scrutiny and examination, and must keep what can be validated and must reject what can be debunked or discounted. My only wish, for Mr. Erickson, is that he may be willing to sort good material from bad and use the good material for his documentary, while discarding the bad. But until there is an actual release for us to examine, I personally will give him the benefit of the doubt that he will strive to release a responsible and reliable documentary. Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MikeG Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 (edited) well there goes all of the erickson projects credibility ................and there goes someone else jumping the gun. Mike Edited February 15, 2012 by MikeG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 rockiessquatching: Have I made any comment specifically about the content of Mr. Erickson's documentary? No. I do not know what the content of his release will be, when he does in fact finally release it. Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted February 15, 2012 BFF Patron Share Posted February 15, 2012 (edited) I'd rather see (and pay for) ten minutes of quality documented video in hd than an hour of filler to make something of a length comparable to other dvd's or TV documentaries. Sure, it might result in less money but the credibility of two projects now seems staked on this alliance. Ditch the filler and junk. Edited February 15, 2012 by bipedalist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterbarber Posted February 15, 2012 Admin Share Posted February 15, 2012 This is old news and was mentioned in the Erickson project thread. http://bigfootforums.com/index.php?/topic/1037-erickson-project/page__view__findpost__p__83259 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gershake Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 (edited) (continued from thread that was locked) Thanks bsruther that was a fantastic read!!! one-upped @Bill: Does the artist's rendition on the Erickson project website seem to be an artist's rendition of the creature in the fake footage you examined? Thanks, - Shake Edited February 15, 2012 by gershake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Shake: The artist rendition has no resemblance to any footage I've seen. Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gershake Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 That sound you guys are hearing is drops of sweat being wiped off my forehead, hitting the ground. Thanks, Bill. - Shake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bsruther Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 (continued from thread that was locked) Thanks bsruther that was a fantastic read!!! one-upped I believe it was Masterbarber that posted both of those links in this thread, many months ago. I live fairly close to the Erickson site and having been there, find it extremely hard to believe that 9 ft. tall bipeds resided there. I'll try to keep an open mind for a little longer though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterbarber Posted February 16, 2012 Admin Share Posted February 16, 2012 My "source" is my own image stabilized work on HD footage. The footage I have stabilized and studied is a Chewbacca mask, with hair modified from the commercial mask versions. I think some folks are missing the Bombshell potential of this statement, along with Db's observations while he was on site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Just for the record, I advised the person who provided me the footage that it should not be used or shown under any circumstances where there might be even a suggestion it is real. I can only hope said person will heed the advice. Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jodie Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Oh surely not. Unless you wanted the DVD to appeal to an overseas market where the customers don't know any better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts