bipedalist Posted December 21, 2011 BFF Patron Share Posted December 21, 2011 Yep only 400-500 dollars, cost of a high end game cam, set up a triggering mechanism or trip pad and cabling from BigTex with one and you got solid gold, looks like a harmless tube. Don't try this at home, could be an expensive experiment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 The only limitations are memory, software, the wavelengths of light captured, and their sensitivity to low light levels. These could be deployed in a network that either stores or transmits the digital data to a large memory storage unit. With the proper software, the images from multiple devices can potentially be merged to provide a complete 3D image composited from devices deployed at multiple angles. Just like a standard digital camera, they could also potentially capture either stills or video. The high definition nature may allow them to capture images at low light levels, or there may be a way to concentrate light by mimicking the function of a nocturnal creature's eye. Alternatively, a different sensor may allow starlight imaging or high definition passive infrared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted December 21, 2011 BFF Patron Share Posted December 21, 2011 I wouldn't be surprised if Bill Dranginis has not already adapted the sensor in just such a way as this in his plans for The Falcon Project aerial platform of equipment. With a five mile line of sight from control, he could deploy such an array in ground based areas and have them activated remotely from the air too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jodie Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 When I say mu, I am saying it wrong, it's micrometer, as in below: Humans at normal body temperature radiate chiefly at wavelengths around 12 μm (micrometres), as shown by Wien's displacement law. The material I was reading referred to IR as electromegnetic radiation. Wouldn't that create an electromagnetic field? Maybe I'm saying it wrong. At some point today I found a source that said PIR cameras were set to respond in the range of 8-14 micrometers. Like Ant said, I'm not sure how fast metabolism would have to be to raise a body temp greater than 14 micrometers, or what that temp would be, I'm sure there is a conversion table somewhere. So all I'm saying is if bigfoot has a temp of 105 degrees, for example, which is outside the range of human or most other animals, it won't trip the camera to fire, would it not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 (edited) I don't know, I would consider this evidence objectively true when it had scientists on location measuring its proportions proving it wasn't a bear. Then we have the PGF, if Bob Herionimus never said he was the guy in the suit it still wouldn't be proof. Any clear photograph no matter how good even with serious investigating will always be considered as a hoax or something else unless a body comes with it. I don't want to discourage anyone from taking and showing them because all of us here do enjoy them, I'm just sayin . . . Bigfoot was filmed, just not "caught", it will be filmed again. Edited December 21, 2011 by Kerry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 (edited) Human tissue does respond to magnetic fields. If it didn't, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) would not work. The MRI measures the resonance of various tissues when exposed to a magnetic field and builds an image based upon the differences in resonance between those various tissues. Researching the relationship of magnetic fields emitted by powerlines and cancer several years ago, I found that some studies found no relationship, and that others did. One meta-study proposed a theory that made sense to me. It is as follows: Magnetic fields do not cause cancer in healthy tissue. They can, however, cause cancer growth to accelerate if cancerous tissue already exists. The reason: We have enzymes in our body that repair genetic damage, but to function properly and destroy or repair precancerous tissue, they must be able to rotate freely in space. Unfortunately, these enzymes have positive and negative ends, so when they are exposed to a magnetic field, they align themselves with the field and are unable to perform their function due to their restricted movement. This would be a problem if an individual remains stationary within a static field for extended periods of time on a recurring basis. The question, though, is whether or not an individual can generate a magnetic field. Cerulean photography suggests that this is the case. We do also know that we can pick up static electricity from our environment and that our movement may cause currents on the surface of our bodies. For example, one's hair may attract electrons more readily than the soles of one's feet, so electrons move about on the body as we pick up static electricity from the environment. One's clothing can also participate in this effect. Two pieces of clothing rubbing against each other may create a charge separation resulting in an ionic field about the body that deforms as one approaches or recedes from other objects that bear a static charge, or devices that emit a magnetic field. Any device with an electrical current can emit a magnetic field. A magnetic field can also induce a current in an electronic device moving through that field. The electrical current in a remote control is very low, and is initiated when a button is pushed. It is possible that a low power magnetic field can induce a short circuit in a specific part of the device, perhaps just that part which performs a specific function. The most likely explanation is that you were wearing something that caused a charge separation to occur in your clothing. Did you also experience shocks when touching other people or metal objects like doorknobs that night? Edited December 21, 2011 by JDL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 My friend Bob got an interesting blobsquatch video AFTER he built a copper enclosure for his camcorder designed to contain the EMF generated by the camera. He also utilized the technique Timbergiant on Youtube employs, of filming in one direction while looking/facing another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted December 21, 2011 BFF Patron Share Posted December 21, 2011 When I say mu, I am saying it wrong, it's micrometer, as in below: Humans at normal body temperature radiate chiefly at wavelengths around 12 μm (micrometres), as shown by Wien's displacement law. The material I was reading referred to IR as electromegnetic radiation. Wouldn't that create an electromagnetic field? Maybe I'm saying it wrong. At some point today I found a source that said PIR cameras were set to respond in the range of 8-14 micrometers. Like Ant said, I'm not sure how fast metabolism would have to be to raise a body temp greater than 14 micrometers, or what that temp would be, I'm sure there is a conversion table somewhere. So all I'm saying is if bigfoot has a temp of 105 degrees, for example, which is outside the range of human or most other animals, it won't trip the camera to fire, would it not? http://www.selexgalileo.com/SelexGalileo/EN/Business/Products/Advanced_Sensors/index.sdo http://www.selex-sas.com/EN/Common/files/SELEX_Galileo/Products/HYDRA_PIR_dsh.pdf This device goes straight to detection, reduces false alarms but drops the camera it looks like. Don't ask on price, looks pricey. And, for those last minute Christmas gifts for the upper income bracket shopper: http://www.selexgalileo.com/SelexGalileo/EN/Business/Products/Unmanned_Aerial_Systems/index.sdo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunflower Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 The hairy people are caught on game cams. My avatar is a crop from a game cam pic. Game cam was left in my friend's yard and definitely in the sunlight as you can see. Another series of 862 pics were taken with a game cam, same yard. This time, however, the hairy person figured out that the pencil made the game cam snap a pic. So the pencil was being photographed all night long going in and out of a large shrub in the yard. I don't know if it was the actual arm of the hairy person or pencil but it hilariously funny to us. They do have a sense of humor.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jodie Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Human tissue does respond to magnetic fields. If it didn't, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) would not work. The MRI measures the resonance of various tissues when exposed to a magnetic field and builds an image based upon the differences in resonance between those various tissues. Researching the relationship of magnetic fields emitted by powerlines and cancer several years ago, I found that some studies found no relationship, and that others did. One meta-study proposed a theory that made sense to me. It is as follows: Magnetic fields do not cause cancer in healthy tissue. They can, however, cause cancer growth to accelerate if cancerous tissue already exists. The reason: We have enzymes in our body that repair genetic damage, but to function properly and destroy or repair precancerous tissue, they must be able to rotate freely in space. Unfortunately, these enzymes have positive and negative ends, so when they are exposed to a magnetic field, they align themselves with the field and are unable to perform their function due to their restricted movement. This would be a problem if an individual remains stationary within a static field for extended periods of time on a recurring basis. The question, though, is whether or not an individual can generate a magnetic field. Cerulean photography suggests that this is the case. We do also know that we can pick up static electricity from our environment and that our movement may cause currents on the surface of our bodies. For example, one's hair may attract electrons more readily than the soles of one's feet, so electrons move about on the body as we pick up static electricity from the environment. One's clothing can also participate in this effect. Two pieces of clothing rubbing against each other may create a charge separation resulting in an ionic field about the body that deforms as one approaches or recedes from other objects that bear a static charge, or devices that emit a magnetic field. Any device with an electrical current can emit a magnetic field. A magnetic field can also induce a current in an electronic device moving through that field. The electrical current in a remote control is very low, and is initiated when a button is pushed. It is possible that a low power magnetic field can induce a short circuit in a specific part of the device, perhaps just that part which performs a specific function. The most likely explanation is that you were wearing something that caused a charge separation to occur in your clothing. Did you also experience shocks when touching other people or metal objects like doorknobs that night? No JDL, I didn't shock anything. I just figured something about my EMF was interfering with that particular code, but I don't really know. It didn't occur to me until I read up on it the past two days that IR=EMF=body heat. I don't think I would have tied any of this with bigfoot had we not been watching the bigfoot reruns Sunday afternoon. I don't know what other variables could have affected it. The volume didn't work Sunday and Monday if I was near the remote, yet it did tonight. I had on flannel pajama pants and a tee shirt on Sunday, jeans and a sweater on Monday, and casual work clothes this afternoon. Everything emits IR=EMF=heat of some kind, even the earth, based on what I read. http://www.selexgalileo.com/SelexGalileo/EN/Business/Products/Advanced_Sensors/index.sdo http://www.selex-sas.com/EN/Common/files/SELEX_Galileo/Products/HYDRA_PIR_dsh.pdf This device goes straight to detection, reduces false alarms but drops the camera it looks like. Don't ask on price, looks pricey. And, for those last minute Christmas gifts for the upper income bracket shopper: http://www.selexgalileo.com/SelexGalileo/EN/Business/Products/Unmanned_Aerial_Systems/index.sdo If you can't find a bigfoot with that set up, then they aren't out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 The only other thought I have is that there might be a microfracture somewhere in the circuit. If so, the circuit may break on occassion as the material comprising the circuit expands and contracts as temperature increases and decreases. The microfracture would have to be sensitive to very small variations in heat in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jodie Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Well that sounds reasonable. We did see the red light coming out the end of the remote when we hit the volume, just not sure if it was sending the right PIR. See, I should have asked you in the first place JDL. I'll remember that next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I could be wrong. You do have a magnetic personality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nalajr Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 If Sassy has developed the ability to reason, think and interpret situations as well as recognize and understand what a camera does or a gun does, then why hasn't Sassy developed other higher level behaviors like building shelter, making and using tools or weapons to fell its prey? Why not bury their dead or develop a complex social structure with language? These are all characteristics that Sassy should have if he has the abilities already mentioned in this thread. These things would easily be found if it were so. As demonstrated Many TIMES, humans can't even hide from people looking to discover them in vast, unspoiled habitats. Another question. If Sassy has developed the ability to recognize a game cam, or an area where one might be, and then avoid it, he would have to TEACH that to the young Sassy he has sired. These young Sassys wouldn't have the understanding or experience that the adults have, not even close. Why haven't game cams caught young Sassys that had no idea what a game cam was or even what a HUMAN was and didn't know that the scent of man is a danger to be avoided at all costs? You'd figure that the young-ins would go out every day or so and explore and play in their environment. Sooner or later they would wander into a trail cam wouldn't they? An animal the size of Sassy would have to spend a great deal of his day looking for and consuming food. They don't have motorcycles, they have to expend LOTS of energy on a daily basis. At some point wouldn't Sassy be busy looking for his daily caloric intake that he would become careless and just happen by a game cam on his way to his feeding area? If one was going to a feeding area, if assuming they have the abilities that have been mentioned, they would also tell that to other Sassys in their group and numerous members would be going to get food from a particular spot or area. Wouldn't it be likely that a single one could or would maybe not hear or ignore the warning of the Matriarch Sassy to STAY AWAY from this trail over here, there's a strange box on the tree that's probably a camera and will bring more of the White Face beings to us choosing instead to make it easier on himself and take the shortcut to the food and spend less energy and get there before the others do? This is, of course, assuming that they have evolved these abilities I mentioned above that have been talked about in this thread and other places. I am NOT conceding these abailites at all, just asking questions that would have to be raised even if they were able to do the things that you all are talking about. Later Nalajr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StankApe Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Something else to consider is the build up of static electricity.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts