Guest VioletX Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 I suspect DR date of viewing the body is on the day of the movie premiere, or after. Just a guess. ( which means I highly doubt he will see anything ) I have no opinion on whether the thread is opened back up or not, that's for the mods to decide. I would like to keep this thread open and on topic however. with the 1% possibilty DR does see this body, I would feel comfortable with his word that he saw it. I really think he will see the body, if it were me I would have a hard time waiting to go, but throw in work and family etc. I guess he is going when it works best for him.
Guest Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 Well whatever the case, this thread is all about Derek Randles and his future statement on this story. As he has not stated that he will not be reporting here but elsewhere instead, I just would like to Sorry meant to read 'now stated' rather than 'not stated'! btw
Guest Hawk-o Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 This is why I dont agree with withholding evidence. There should be no debate and no BS involved. If you have evidence, if you have a dead Bigfoot, you should put up or shut up. If Dyer and these other guys are sick of the controversy, then put it out there, release the evidence, and watch every single naysayer eat his/her words and then watch everyone look like a fool. If not, dont be surprised when people say you're full of it. Due to contract obiligations and NDA's with the film company, HE CAN NOT SHOW THE EVIDENCE UNTILL AFTER THE MOVIE RELEASE.
dopelyrics Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 Due to contract obiligations and NDA's with the film company, HE CAN NOT SHOW THE EVIDENCE UNTILL AFTER THE MOVIE RELEASE. According to who?OH YEAH RICK DYER.
Guest Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 Due to contract obiligations and NDA's with the film company, HE CAN NOT SHOW THE EVIDENCE UNTILL AFTER THE MOVIE RELEASE. Right... Seeing as how ALL the press are just clamoring...
Guest Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 Due to contract obiligations and NDA's with the film company, HE CAN NOT SHOW THE EVIDENCE UNTILL AFTER THE MOVIE RELEASE. Except to Musky Allen and the FBFB people.
Guest Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 (edited) Try to imagine if YOU had a BF body. The enormity of the situation would be overwhelming. Of course it would take a long time to set up the logistics of storing the body and having proper examinations done so that when it is released for public observation,there would be no questions. I truly believe that IF RD has a BF, he is being advised by people much smarter then us, on how to proceed with things. Keyword IF. Edited March 3, 2013 by Rich1016
Guest Hawk-o Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 (edited) ^ Problem is, they can;t imagine having a Bigfoot Body... no hours in the feild, no idea how to track the creature, they jsut sit behinda keyboard all day and pass judgment. I for one will put my trust into a man who is not only a Master Tracker, but theworlds greatest Bigfoot tracker! Edited March 4, 2013 by AaronD to remove quote of previous post
Guest Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 (edited) Some people act like he should have snapped some photos and video and then propped the BF up in his back yard for all to see. ^ You go Hawk Edited March 4, 2013 by AaronD to remove quote of previous post
Guest Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 So Rich, if you had to speculate, who are these advisors that are so much smarter than the rest of us? In my view if this happened to be true, it's being bungled worse than the Ketchum Project and he is probably costing himself tens of millions of dollars. I'd say these advisors have mishandled this from the outset.
Guest Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 (edited) So Rich, if you had to speculate, who are these advisors that are so much smarter than the rest of us? In my view if this happened to be true, it's being bungled worse than the Ketchum Project and he is probably costing himself tens of millions of dollars. I'd say these advisors have mishandled this from the outset. I totally respect your opinion on this matter. How do you think this has been mishandled, if I may ask? Hypothetically speaking of course, these advisors would be people handling and studying the specimen,investors, minnow films perhaps. Also possible people wanting to buy the specimen. Edited March 4, 2013 by AaronD to remove quote posted twice
Guest Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 I dont understand why this thread is still digressing from the Poll and its question? Weird that.
dopelyrics Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 (edited) Problem is, they can;t imagine having a Bigfoot Body... no hours in the feild, no idea how to track the creature, they jsut sit behinda keyboard all day and pass judgment. I for one will put my trust into a man who is not only a Master Tracker, but theworlds greatest Bigfoot tracker! And there was me thinking a forum was designed for people to sit behind a keyboard and pass comment. Incidentally, we are honoured that you have given up so much of your time from being in the field to, um, sit behind a desk all day and pass judgement. Your master tracker comment made me smile, though, I have to admit. As long as we can all keep our sense of humour, we'll be ok. Best regards, Lee Edited March 3, 2013 by dopelyrics
Guest Thepattywagon Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 I hope Derek has considered that Dyer may end up proclaiming, "I even duped one of the most respected BF researchers in the country into making a trip to see the 'body'." What I mean by this is that IF Minnow is going to use Derek's invitation from a serial hoaxer and obvious attention seeker, to drive home any aspect of the 'hoaxing process', this COULD leave Derek looking a bit foolish. But I'm sure he has considered the pros and cons of accepting the invitation, and I highly doubt it's gonna happen anyway.
Recommended Posts