Tree Manipulation/ Wood Structures: What Is The Evidence?

[WSA]

Number 9...Number 9...Number 9.... 

[roguefooter]

I just wish that skeptics of all stripes would start recognizing the breadth and depth of real-world skills and knowledge and plain old bootsole verification the proponents bring to this area of study.

 

 

We have one person outright lying about bigfoot stories, another person touting an April Fool's joke as being compelling, and you still want to preach about real-world skills and knowledge, huh?

Edited April 14, 2015 by roguefooter

[Guest]

Easy, Fabio! You sound angry. Is everything okay? After a glass or two of bourbon your post gets real interesting. It really does. You seem to have been emboldened recently by the slack-jawed and slaphappy comments directed toward myself of late. When we buy into your posturing "Prove it to me" attitude we are being set up to lose right? Isn't that how you work? - no matter what anyone says it doesn’t resonate with you.  Unfortunately I can't satisfy you’re my position but neither can you.

 

 

[roguefooter]

Gumshoeye, while you're willing to chat please explain the contradictions of your comments:

 

"I did not see the thing when I snapped the photo"

 

"It was standing upright looking at me looking at it." 

 

 

"Prove it to me" attitude? Nope. The proof is right there in front of everyone's face- what we're dealing with here is acceptance or denial. The more I think about it Gumshoeye the more it equates a hoax- deliberately telling a phony story presented as being true.

Edited April 15, 2015 by roguefooter

[Guest WesT]

Very interesting indeed......

 

Humans aren't the only ones who hunt with weapons -- a troop of chimps in the wild have been observed crafting sharp spears to stab their prey.

 

The technique, described in the latest issue of the journal Royal Society Open Science, could have originated with the common ancestor of humans and chimps, suggesting that the earliest humans hunted in a similar manner. Link

 

 

WSA, remember when you said it looked like a beaver gnawed on the end of the suspected weapon?

 

Some individuals further trim the tip of the tool with their teeth," adds Pruetz, who is a professor in the Department of Anthropology at Iowa State University.

Edited April 16, 2015 by WesT

[WSA]

Well, why not?  Very interesting theory that seems to jibe nicely with what we already know.  Nice catch.

[Guest WesT]

 Thanks!  I guess this old guy isn't crazy after all..... 

[WSA]

http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=46475

[Guest diana swampbooger]

Gumshoeye,

Your post #412 of a blonde squatch is spectacular!!! I'm thinking she might be female judging from the shoulder width & using a few of my other senses. Possibly her baby to the left of her. Did you notice the baby peeking out before or after the pic was snapped?

It's kind of a shame that digital pics shimmer squatch hair. I noticed that some pics shimmered an object/s back when we bought a digital camera in the early '90's. I guess that had something to do with transparency/luminosity/reflectivity.

I noticed MK Davis on one of his latest YT's has a clump of squatch hair from one specimen. He's noticed quite a variety of textures, colors, transparencies, reflectivities & luminosities. I hope he will use different types of film/filters/digitals in order to investigate which type/s of equipment would produce the very best photo.

Again, thank you for sharing in spite of the typical trolling.

[WSA]

http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_report.asp?id=48652

[Guest Crowlogic]

The question begs to be asked whether any bigfoot artifacts such as scat or fur ever been connected with these wooded structures.  Has anyone ever seen a bigfoot make a wooden structure or stack a rock or do anything at all regarding these things?  Are there bigfoot prints around them?  Each and every one I've watched has had nothing to indicate anything to connect with bigfoot.  Oh they appear in remote places where humans don't normally go.  Well wake up kids there are human beings finding these things so indeed humans go to these places after all.  Furthermore as the wood structures idea spreads people will make them to yank the chains of the bigfooters.

[ShadowBorn]

The question begs to be asked whether any bigfoot artifacts such as scat or fur ever been connected with these wooded structures.  Has anyone ever seen a bigfoot make a wooden structure or stack a rock or do anything at all regarding these things?  Are there bigfoot prints around them?  Each and every one I've watched has had nothing to indicate anything to connect with bigfoot.  Oh they appear in remote places where humans don't normally go.  Well wake up kids there are human beings finding these things so indeed humans go to these places after all.  Furthermore as the wood structures idea spreads people will make them to yank the chains of the bigfooters.

CrowLogic

Have you ever heard anything behind the scenes on this forum being said " hey lets yank the chain of that person in that area and see what he does?". See I can see how that can play out with tree structures and how other humans can play tricks on others. It is when you C.Y.O.A  yourself that you know that these tree structures were made just so that you would find them. I walk off path and go deep into the forest and would never follow the same route and bam there would be a limb break that would be unexplained. A tree structure that would be hard to find unless you were really looking for it and the structure would only be maybe two feet tall. It made no sense as to why this structure was so well hidden and meant not to be found.

 

I find that the structures happen after one starts exploring a territory  where these creatures roam. Now this is just my opinion but maybe these creatures build these structures as way of saying that this is our turf  our corner to our turf . Just like the X's on trails where ones see them but ignores then wonders why they get growled at or escorted out. But this just conjecture on my part.

 

I did have pictures of a bait pile where there were some tree's near it. Well I would lay the bait and it all gone but find no deer or turkey, so I placed a game cam. well some how the bait ended up missing no prints , one of the trees dropped down over the bait pile and the camera capture nothing since it was a 35 mm camera. What happen with the camera was very strange since there are only so many pictures on a single roll. I had that camera locked ,the tree that fell over the bait pile was about 4" in diameter and it looked liked some thing climbed to the top and swung down to break it. what ever it was some how knew about the camera and played with the camera until all the photo's were taken on that 35 mm. It then proceeded to grab the bait  by using the tree that was now leaning over the bait. Again I am assuming this since I was not there that night, and I do know that the turkey and the deer are not going to conspire to steel all this bait . By taking the photo's in a single night knocking down a tree so that they do not leave their tracks. The bait was that corn on the cob and the stranger part was that I would find some of the bait on some of the trails where I would find their tracks.  

[Guest Crowlogic]

^^^^^And of course you have the game cam photos to back this up?  Where one person can go so can go another.  Now a word about bigfoot hunting.  I follow two different research groups.  Now not long ago I was watching a video of one of the groups and I noticed that the scene was familiar that I'd seen it before.  As the video went on it became clear that these folks were in the exact (remote) location as the person normally researching there.  Then at the end of the video the "visiting group" gave full disclosure that they were in the area of another researcher and gave credit to that researcher.  

 

Now what does wood structures have to do with bait?

Edited September 24, 2015 by Crowlogic

[WSA]

I've been waiting a long time for somebody to explain tree breaks like this to me...so go ahead CL. We're anxiously awaiting your explanations.

 

You see, it is not nearly enough to posit "BF didn't do this." You must explain what did or just please kindly just shut your yap.  This is far from proving a negative, as I would predict you to say. It is about a real event, needing to be explain by real physics. 

 

Go....

[dmaker]

It's alright for you to say you think bigfoot did it, but no one can say I don't think bigfoot did it, without being told to shut their yap by you? 

 

I don't think bigfoot is responsible for any tree breaks. I think they are all the result of natural events such as wind or snowfall. Perhaps even some human effort to boot.

 

 

Must I now "shut my yap"?