david75090 Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 ALL destroyed campsites were destroyed by BF. Except, of course, those that were not...
Guest Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 ALL destroyed campsites were destroyed by BF. Except, of course, those that were not... LOL … Well said David, that’s one way put to it.
Lake County Bigfooot Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 Does anyone know Bob personally, and if so, has he commented on the Sasquatch Chronicles version of the events, Wes said that he could not get anything out of Bob, and that he filled in the blanks talking with some other people. That does not seem like the most reliable information, I would like to hear it from Bob himself.
coffee2go Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 I agree LCB. In a search of youtube I found more than one Bob Garrett. One of the Bob's had videos that were taken down because of very undesirable content unrelated to Sasquatch. Until the real Bob Garrett comes forward with information, everything else will continue to be speculation.
Guest Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 (edited) Other than Sheriff Pat Garrett allegedly gunning down outlaw Billy the Kid, I never heard the name of Garrett, until this business of videotaping some wrecked campsites. Then again, something very disturbing and, frankly, unexplained beyond our current level of understanding occurred, I think most will agree. Edited February 11, 2015 by Gumshoeye
Sunflower Posted February 12, 2015 Posted February 12, 2015 (edited) Gumshoe, You have a pm. Edited February 12, 2015 by Sunflower
Guest Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 As I listening to Sasquatch Chronicles Bog Radio, episode #70 the hosts and their guest were discussing Bob Barrett as it relates to his claims of harassment for video filming a torn up campsite that infers Bigfoot related. Was it an aberration or anomaly? Could be but I wanted to see what, if any, other reports claiming campsite destroyed had in common, and so I started looking. Upon closer examination of reports that I read, I noticed more than a dozen similar reports made by people over the years across the country claiming the same destruction. After listening to Bob Garrett interview I tried searching for his torn up camp video and as I am sure you know it is MIA . I did find a few still pictures of the camp . What puzzles me is the story goes there was two bodies at the camp and one person who escaped in a truck . But I never have heard Bob say that , but yet the authorities who allegedly were on the seen the next morning covering up all tracks of any type and cleaning up the area of the camp supposedly told him to forget what he saw or he could disappear like others have and there was threats of being put in prison ,followed , harassed , computer hacked , videos deleted and facebook page disabled . Anyone ever heard Bob or his son say there was bodies and blood ? Maybe I missed it .
chelefoot Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 In the first thread that was started here, I don't recall anything about bodies in the videos or the discussion. I haven't gone back to read it all, but I don't recall anything like that. Here's is the other thread about the campsite: http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/44943-interesting-video-torn-up-camp/?view=findpost&p=803481&hl=garrett And the thread with the interview: http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/47715-torn-up-tent-bob-garrett-interview/?hl=garrett (The video is disabled.) 1
Guest Posted February 17, 2015 Posted February 17, 2015 I did a real quick scan of the thread to ensure it wasn't a double post and did not see it posted here. I was looking for something pertinent to Bigfoot reports related to orchards and farms when I came across these two summaries of mine from Michigan, and I thought this would be a proper thread to post them. 2003 September Chippewa County, Michigan Two men inside tent heard vicious gorilla-like snarls, peeked outside and seen an 8 foot, 500 lbs., brown/ black animal casting a huge shadow who then touches the tent and leaves with one shoe. 2003 July Montmorency County, Michigan Camper is paralyzed in fear when out of nowhere started hearing roars, screams, and big branches breaking. The noise coming closer and closer causes him to flee until daylight, when he returns in daylight finds his tent ripped to shreds and a large tree uprooted.
wiiawiwb Posted February 17, 2015 Posted February 17, 2015 I'm not buying any of this and don't subscribe to the notion that hikers, campers, or backpackers are being successfully targeted for the dinner plate. We'd all hear more about it in the local backcountry areas we frequent. I'm an avid hiker/backpaker/SAR and never hear even whispers about unexplained disappearances and places torn up. I am certain Sasquatch are out these and have had several instances I can't explain in any conventional sense. Having said that, I don't believe for a second that nefarious behavior happens in anything other than the most highly unusual cases. There isn't a land creature on this planet that hasn't learned from other creatures over the many centuries that if you go after one of those weird humans, many more will come...with weapons. I don't buy any of it. 4
MarkGlasgow Posted February 17, 2015 Posted February 17, 2015 I don't buy any of it. Yup. It still sounds like sensationalism to me.
Lake County Bigfooot Posted February 17, 2015 Posted February 17, 2015 (edited) The government is smart enough to buy an individual out, I mean put him on the payroll, so someone who is dangerous to the government might actually become the government, that is how it works. What if the government wants us to believe these creatures are dangerous, and that they should be eliminated for public safety. Do not let anything surprise you, if you go down the conspiracy road all bets are off and all options are on the table. but when it all hits the fan ask yourself this one question, who stands to gain politically or financially or both, that is the only true trail to follow. If the Government knew that Sasquatch were predictable and safe they would have already made them public, the fact that they have not, despite many reports from individuals in various offices that they know of these creatures, that tells me they know they are not predictable or safe in all circumstances(this is my using my trusting citizen logic). Well to that I say, sharks are not either and they let us swim in the ocean, same basic idea here. So what could it be other than concerns for the multi billion dollar forest industry, hmmm those dang spotted owls...if you follow my line of reasoning they can explain the fact that we have been kept in the dark because these creatures were unpredictable and dangerous, but in the end the issue is purely monetary, and they can seek to justify killing these creatures if they are deemed dangerous enough to public safety, that has supposedly already happened, funny thing is you can never find a body or a family member reporting an individual who was killed by one, only very elaborate stories. Discovery of the creature is way too messy, keep it hidden, that is what I think is the end game till that is no longer possible. The they could demonize them, or simply campaign for public awareness without significant habitat protections, that is the ultimate issue, what will it cost if we decide to actually protect their habitat. Newsflash government! they are doing fine as they are, wait newsflash citizen that is a justification, it goes on and on and on. maybe if Sasquatch could vote, lets say they have enough Homo DNA, well that might be the ultimate third party! Edited February 18, 2015 by Lake County Bigfooot
Lake County Bigfooot Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 (edited) Following my logic above, I might expect the government to even stage a camp destruction, perhaps putting blood and bodies and footprints in place, make it convincing. Better yet put it right in the path of a known researcher to discover, then act like your covering up the truth, scare the crap out him. End result, public think Bigfoot dangerous, public need big government to protect him...you see where I am going. If your going to think Government Conspiracy you gotta give them a little more creative license and perhaps more credit for weaving the web. Are they really doing that well as a specie? Is the government systematically seeking to eliminate them based on a financial motive vs. that they are dangerous. Is it easier to conceal discovery or justify concealing discovery if they have some sinister subplot, this is what makes a decent movie in my book. Basically, if you can think it, it might be possible, but expect it to be a bit more complicated, don't be a simpleton, even if you enjoy that disposition. Edited February 18, 2015 by Lake County Bigfooot
Guest Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 Yup. It still sounds like sensationalism to me. Everyone is pretty thrilled with the Falcon Project … I think that is a fair statement. Somebody from this very forum is joining that project … is that a fair statement? The front man of the Falcon Project had some pretty poignant things to say about Campsite Destroyed, Bob Garett and that’s where it will remain for others to hear and draw their own conclusions. Nothing else left for the imagination. Following my logic above, I might expect the government to even stage a camp destruction, perhaps putting blood and bodies and footprints in place, make it convincing. Better yet put it right in the path of a known researcher to discover, then act like your covering up the truth, scare the crap out him. End result, public think Bigfoot dangerous, public need big government to protect him...you see where I am going. If your going to think Government Conspiracy you gotta give them a little more creative license and perhaps more credit for weaving the web. Are they really doing that well as a specie? Is the government systematically seeking to eliminate them based on a financial motive vs. that they are dangerous. Is it easier to conceal discovery or justify concealing discovery if they have some sinister subplot, this is what makes a decent movie in my book. Basically, if you can think it, it might be possible, but expect it to be a bit more complicated, don't be a simpleton, even if you enjoy that disposition. Good interview LCB, thanks for providing the link. If I misunderstood the essence of the interview please let me know and I’ll apologize most graciously to everyone.
Recommended Posts