norseman Posted March 29, 2015 Admin Author Posted March 29, 2015 Ok, let's see your proof to prove otherwise Yuchi? Let's see how the comparison between great ape and Sasquatch is preposterous!?
Sasfooty Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 There was nothing apelike about the one I saw closest FTF. When I first saw him I was seeing a really tall guy with a small turned-up nose that looked more Mediterranean than anything else. Dark, thick hair, dark eyes, brown skin, low forehead, very human-like. The idea of him being an ape never entered my mind. One of my first thoughts was "Who IS that?" The only one I've seen whose face had any kind of animal look at all, looked slightly canine. To me, this suggests different kinds like Branco has spoken of, & the more human looking kind are the ones I've seen. You might want to get a good look at that face before you pull the trigger, Norse. Otherwise, if you have a conscious, it might torment you for a long time. That little sparrow, ya know...........?
Guest Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 How could you think something covered in hair is just a really tall guy?
Sasfooty Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 I didn't see the body, otherwise, I would have probably known it was a BF. Just saw the face looking down at me.
norseman Posted March 29, 2015 Admin Author Posted March 29, 2015 Who in this thread thinks the PGF is real?
norseman Posted March 29, 2015 Admin Author Posted March 29, 2015 Well if I was Bob Gimlin? Patty would have proven the existence of the species that day. And I think I have a decent idea of what the species looks like because of that film.
Guest DWA Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Well, there you are. And I think the basic problem here - for which I blame relevant scientists more than anyone else - is that relevant scientists are saying it's real, and no relevant scientist is even taking a half decent look at what they say, or asking half decent questions why they think that. And I won't get started on the people who think that the Three Monkeys approach by the mainstream is anything but a travesty of science.
Guest Crowlogic Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Exactly, they can be shot now with impunity. If they cared a hoot they would prove the species real so we could get real laws passed for their protection! Instead of a lot of hot air. Indeed and I can promise you that not a single one can make a telling argument as to why the won't. They'll fall back on the tired typical secret squirrel excuses but there's not a single one who can deliver one to the world based on their claims. There's not a single one that will even make a convincing counterpoint this post.
Guest DWA Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Um, one isn't needed. Until one shows that one is making a convincing argument based on, you know, evidence.
Yuchi1 Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Ok, let's see your proof to prove otherwise Yuchi? Let's see how the comparison between great ape and Sasquatch is preposterous!? I never said I had "proof" rather, evidence as illustrated by the testimony from individuals I know personally as well as even members of this forum. You, on the other hand are a complete "virgin" and instead appear to be relying upon mythical (Beowulf) stories in an attempt to demonize the subject (per the picture & rationale, as presented on your website) and therefore justify/rationalize your endeavour. That, young man is the definition of preposterous behavior and irrational logic. Well if I was Bob Gimlin? Patty would have proven the existence of the species that day. And I think I have a decent idea of what the species looks like because of that film. Have you ever wondered why he didn't pull the trigger?
norseman Posted March 29, 2015 Admin Author Posted March 29, 2015 I never said I had "proof" rather, evidence as illustrated by the testimony from individuals I know personally as well as even members of this forum.You, on the other hand are a complete "virgin" and instead appear to be relying upon mythical (Beowulf) stories in an attempt to demonize the subject (per the picture & rationale, as presented on your website) and therefore justify/rationalize your endeavour. That, young man is the definition of preposterous behavior and irrational logic. Have you ever wondered why he didn't pull the trigger? First of all I'm going to be a grandfather soon....... I have no idea where you came up with the idea that I was a young man or virginal. You can stop with personal attacks at any time, thanks. Secondly, I'm sorry that you think the oldest story in the English language brings shame upon this subject. And lastly? I'm sick of your sanctimonious self serving rhetoric. If you don't like what I'm doing? I DONT CARE. And if your smart enough you can go read Bob Gimlin's response to my direct question concerning shooting patty....... It's here.
MagniAesir Posted March 30, 2015 Posted March 30, 2015 (edited) What's not even close?? I'm very familiar with using a bow on large animals, such as a bear. Fred Bear took a Polar Bear with a bow. After multiple attempts failed, and the guide had to kill the bear with a gun. I think you missed the point. Killing one would be much easier than removing the body.... That you need African big 5 class firearms to kill an 800lbs animal The great bears are a perfect analogy to the type of weapon needed to kill a sasquatch If they exist And if I. Even remotely believed that groups of Sasquatch would come running out of the woods to attack me if I. Killed one, I would feel quite confident in the company of a few hunters that I know Edited March 30, 2015 by MagniAesir
Yuchi1 Posted March 30, 2015 Posted March 30, 2015 (edited) First of all I'm going to be a grandfather soon....... I have no idea where you came up with the idea that I was a young man or virginal. You can stop with personal attacks at any time, thanks. Secondly, I'm sorry that you think the oldest story in the English language brings shame upon this subject. And lastly? I'm sick of your sanctimonious self serving rhetoric. If you don't like what I'm doing? I DONT CARE. And if your smart enough you can go read Bob Gimlin's response to my direct question concerning shooting patty....... It's here. Your mindset appears that of a young man however, if it's not the case perhaps you're of the type that keeps repeating the same grade, over and over? You are a virgin, when it comes to all things of a personal experience in this endeavour and that's no personal attack rather, your own words. The Beowulf mythology brings no shame unto itself, it is your perversion of it that's shameful. I truly do not care what you are doing however, other pilgrims should take note of the folly of your position. Edited March 30, 2015 by Yuchi1 1
Guest Posted March 30, 2015 Posted March 30, 2015 That you need African big 5 class firearms to kill an 800lbs animal The great bears are a perfect analogy to the type of weapon needed to kill a sasquatch If they exist And if I. Even remotely believed that groups of Sasquatch would come running out of the woods to attack me if I. Killed one, I would feel quite confident in the company of a few hunters that I know Have you ever even hunted dangerous game??
Recommended Posts