Incorrigible1 Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 5 hours ago, BlackRockBigfoot said: Damn... Tough crowd. Thinking Redbone was Sherlock Holmes in a previous life. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1980squatch Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 (edited) 12 hours ago, Explorer said: For those of you who were impressed with the excellent research, applied science, full transparency, and scientific discoveries demonstrated during the 3 week Expedition Bigfoot that took place in a secret wilderness area in central Oregon (selected by a highly advanced algorithm) I do wonder how this show ranks in the amount of lies of all the BF shows ever... it has to be up there... Edited February 4, 2020 by 1980squatch 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redbone Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 6 hours ago, Incorrigible1 said: Thinking Redbone was Sherlock Holmes in a previous life. Sherlock Holmes would've noticed somebody else posted the same video a few hours earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7.62 Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 28 minutes ago, 1980squatch said: I do wonder how this show ranks in the amount of lies of all the BF shows ever... it has to be up there... If they do any kind of appearances anywhere talking about the show now and have a question and answer segment for the audience they will be mocked . You can only stay so polite when people try to deceive you . This isn't just a typical reality TV show about some MTV nonsense this is something many people have devoted countless hours of their lives to. If I was in the audience and had a chance to speak I would call them out on their deceit . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWWASAS Posted February 4, 2020 BFF Patron Share Posted February 4, 2020 I don't know how many conferences I have attended but my fantasy moment is to wait until one of the major speakers like Meldrum is talking on stage, and walk in with a moderate size BF dressed in human clothing, slip down into the back row, and when Meldrum says something like they do not have cultural artifacts so cannot be a human hybrid stand up and say I have to disagree with that. Then go on and say let me introduce my good friend Eglack. He stands up, is near 8 feet, and starts taking off his clothing, revealing he is nearly covered with long hair. His tribe of 25 lives in the Gifford Pinchot in Washington State. He speaks some English and would entertain a few questions but don't take his picture or he will make you eat your camera. The pandemonium that followed would be priceless. But I would settle for someone to show a HD version of a recent video taken at close range. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiflier Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 (edited) Hmmm. Maybe afterwards everyone could follow Eglack outside where he would give them his footprint demonstration. He could then hand out some of his rock-throwing souvenirs that he had saved from different campgrounds. He'd be a hit on the circuit And you, my friend, would be the envy of all. Edited February 4, 2020 by hiflier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 On 2/2/2020 at 6:58 AM, BeansBaxter78 said: Thoughts??? 1) Beautiful ranch. @60 square miles. It's probably better managed land than public lands, too, much like the difference between a rich man's mansion and grounds compared to public housing. I'm really glad such lands exist, and actually exist in abundance in America. It is land like this where a species like sasquatches might find top quality refuge. 2) The habitat just doesn't look like prime sasquatch habitat like a coastal rainforest probably is. If they exist there, I would highly opine that it is transitory. But what a great migratory or movement route it would be. 3) Landowners like those owning this ranch, whether a corporation or family, would have a high motive for keeping sasquatch presence secret. The very last thing such a landowner would want would be to allow government bureaucracy a toehold of authority on their lands. They have a huge investment and future to protect. 4) Considering these thoughts, I'm more interested than ever about why such landowners would allow the filming of this series on their lands. You have personal experience with this, Beans, having filmed a sasquatch hunt on a very large private land holding like this. The first big noticeable difference between your film and this one us that you filmed in the extremely difficult area of a very remote coastal rainforest. The second most notable difference is that you filmed on aboriginal lands. If you paid an access fee at all, my bet is that it was peanuts compared to what the Travel Channel paid. And the Natives have a different perspective on sasquatchery than corporate style landowners. I could go on, but my further thoughts can't compare to yours. What are your thoughts on this? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWWASAS Posted February 4, 2020 BFF Patron Share Posted February 4, 2020 It would make Bob Gimlin jealous. He loves having his pictures taken with people, especially women. People would spend the first hour looking for the zipper in Eglack's costume. Last one of the last conferences I went to, I was bored with a speaker and had been out of the conference hall then came back in and sat in the back. A guy slipped in, sat next to me, which was a bit strange because there were lots of seats. After a few minutes he leaned over and said you want to see a bigfoot? Said he had one tied to the roof of his van. The little voices in my head were saying stay clear of this guy but my curiosity got the best of me. Well what if he did have one? I went out into the dark parking lot and followed him to his van. Sure enough there was something tied on the roof. At first glance it did look like a bigfoot but then I realized it was a full sized BF manikin. It looked pretty good and he should have arranged to have it inside on display. I beat feet back into the hall because I still was afraid of getting mugged. I wondered if he had ever been stopped by a curious police officer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 On 2/2/2020 at 8:36 AM, SWWASAS said: Along with napalm, coffee goes well with the smell of jet engine fumes. I remember during pilot training feeling like I was going to throw up walking out for the first flight of the day. LOL! I bet Airdale has precious memories of such emotions. A close friend who was a Navy airdale told me about strapping pilots in as they left on sorties over North Vietnam........pale, silent, pasty faced, million mile stare. Then, after a successful return, their cocky strut to debriefing, hand slapping with their fellow squadron flyboys, and badass demeanor. It's good to survive........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twist Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Reading a thread like this makes it obvious why the BF field is so splintered. Talks of wanting to mock or ridicule one of the few scientists in the field that speaks up for BF is telling. His opinion is different than yours, so what? 90% of BF knowledge is speculation. It reeks of jealousy. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiflier Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 31 minutes ago, SWWASAS said: People would spend the first hour looking for the zipper in Eglack's costume. Ain't it the truth. They'll know after digging into Eglack's fur looking for it and seeing their arm go out the front door like a boomerang though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 19 minutes ago, Twist said: Reading a thread like this makes it obvious why the BF field is so splintered. Talks of wanting to mock or ridicule one of the few scientists in the field that speaks up for BF is telling. His opinion is different than yours, so what? 90% of BF knowledge is speculation. It reeks of jealousy. Read of the controversies, struggles, and back stabbing in the Science world during the era of Darwin, which was precisely when the gorilla was first "discovered", and the foundation of biological ideology as we continue to struggle with. Sasquatchery is nothing, primarily since it is being suppressed. And that suppression is almost certainly related to Darwinism, along with several other ideologies, fields of science, and even most religions. A sasquatch carcass has the potential to be the biggest scientific discovery since the Apollo 11 mission, the biggest anthropological discovery of all time, the biggest religious event since the life of Muhammed, and the biggest social upheaval since the landing of Columbus on Hispaniola........all at the same time. Struggle and backstabbing are guaranteed. Big time. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiflier Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 (edited) ^^^^ The sooner people realize all of your points the better because the subject needs a focus for discovery by everyone. Nice to discuss things and joke around but in truth what we are doing is pretty serious business. Keeping the subject alive while figuring out ways to break things open isn't for the faint of heart. Between the peer attitudes of society as well as science there is a lot of pressure to NOT solve this. There is fear involved which, just by itself, speaks volumes when deciding how to proceed in any effort aimed at proving existence. Weigh that against your post and one can see that it's much easier and safer to discuss and speculate. Who in their right mind is going to take on science and other guardians of the Sasquatch gate? It's a fair question, and one that most of us already know the answer to. Edited February 4, 2020 by hiflier 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWWASAS Posted February 4, 2020 BFF Patron Share Posted February 4, 2020 2 hours ago, hiflier said: Ain't it the truth. They'll know after digging into Eglack's fur looking for it and seeing their arm go out the front door like a boomerang though They might get a big surprise looking through the fur in the costume pants for a lower zipper. Somehow I don't think BF would like that. In spite of some discrete questions to habbers, I have yet to get a clear answer to the question of what can be normally seen down there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NatFoot Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 49 minutes ago, SWWASAS said: They might get a big surprise looking through the fur in the costume pants for a lower zipper. Somehow I don't think BF would like that. In spite of some discrete questions to habbers, I have yet to get a clear answer to the question of what can be normally seen down there. There's only two possible answers right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts