Guest Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 When was the first report of the paper is in peer review? wasn't it in 2010?
Guest Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 Ketchum herself posted that it was in peer review at the end of last year.
Doc Holliday Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 Hey All! Say how's that DNA thing working out ~ well,well......... 1st wickie returns & somehow i missed this RRS, been a while bud, too long. yeah, the dna thing is working out about like the rest of all things BF,just a little more drama this time.
Guest Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Argument from large amounts of authority is still argument from authority. Dr Ketchum's lab is completely qualified to examine and type DNA. Be that as it maybe, it does not make my presumption incorrect, my source is an authority. You can't identify something through DNA if you are never in your lab to work the specimen up. And speaking of argument from authority, you are not immune to using your own sources of authority for the basis of your debate, irregardless of whether they are actually an authority on the topic. That's what I find so entertaining about your posts and appreciate about your contributions. So he's on record with his disgruntledness. Interesting that he's cast himself as an opponent to the reported paper that "slighted" his expertise... Tim B. In truth, he said he would have to see her data, and that if the data was sound, then the suggestion of hybridization made the most sense. Evidently Dr. Ketchum has slighted everyone in that very small community of expertise.
TimB Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 I just read that article about the small area of expertise. Still sounds like sour grapes. Tim B.
Guest Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Either way, if a paper is ever forthcoming, they will read it.
brianmk Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 ^^ Seems like you will get a declaration soon .. wait for it.
Guest Scout1959 Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Hot on FB Melba Ketchum I am so grateful for all of the love and support that those on here have given me over the eternity that this has taken. I promise that all of you will be blown away with the amount of data that we have accumulated. There is more data in our manuscript than has ever been submitted to prove a new species in an original manuscript. The world will never be the same after this but it is for the best. We must stop the insanity of hunting them (after all, people will be misidentified and targeted also). We will be hearing more shortly. Yes, all of the haters can now feel free to dump on the word "shortly".
Guest Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Hot on FB Melba Ketchum I am so grateful for all of the love and support that those on here have given me over the eternity that this has taken. I promise that all of you will be blown away with the amount of data that we have accumulated. There is more data in our manuscript than has ever been submitted to prove a new species in an original manuscript. The world will never be the same after this but it is for the best. We must stop the insanity of hunting them (after all, people will be misidentified and targeted also). We will be hearing more shortly. Yes, all of the haters can now feel free to dump on the word "shortly". The paragraph before that: Well, the holidays are over and now everything is getting back down to business. Thank goodness, it slowed things down on our end. 2013, finally will be the Year of the Sasquatch! I personally cannot wait! - Dr. Melba Ketchum
bipedalist Posted January 7, 2013 BFF Patron Posted January 7, 2013 If soon and shortly were silver dollars, I'd be a rich man for everytime it's been tossed around in this topic. Still I'll be happy if the quality of the paper is even better than the quantity of the data. 1
Guest VioletX Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Reading between the lines I 'd say it's on, just waiting for scheduling.
Guest slimwitless Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 She added the following to the ensuing comments: Now I haven't given status so don't jump to conclusions, I can't give anymore information at this time. We still have some scrambling to do, but at least we are moving forward again and will know more shortly, soon, and in a reasonable period of time. Anyone else have some more synonyms for soon? LOL
Guest Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Reading between the lines I 'd say it's on, just waiting Yo ... Rockies......... Speaking of tea leaves being smouldering ash ......... Looks like Robert Lindsey will soon post a big announcement (s) about the Ketchum report.... Probably beginning about Tuesday, Jan 15th. Lol, thats "shortly" for some skeptics/skoptics ....... I think he has been working on this final type announce since last month. But again, this is just IMHO ........ Purely speculation on this critics part ...... BTW, ......... When the tea leaves are smouldering ........ My ancestors washed their face in the smoke to capture the truth .... lol.......... Of course .... You have to have an open mind to do that .. ( read the tea leaves thingy )
Guest Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 (edited) Reading between the lines I 'd say it's on, just waiting Yo ... Rockies......... Speaking of tea leaves being smouldering ash ......... Looks like Robert Lindsey will soon post a big announcement (s) about the Ketchum report.... I guess he's going for 10 predictions in a row that will be wrong. He's an unstoppable rebel force of inaccuracy. Edited January 7, 2013 by rockiessquatching
Recommended Posts