The Jacobs Photos

[Chim Chim]

I must be missing something, I've seen the picture of the creature's left side and it bending over with it's head on the ground, but no more of the creature itself.

Just the pictures of deer/bear at the same feeder and the scaled pictures with the photoshopped images on them, other than that I've never seen any more.

[norseman]

13 minutes ago, Chim Chim said:

I must be missing something, I've seen the picture of the creature's left side and it bending over with it's head on the ground, but no more of the creature itself.

Just the pictures of deer/bear at the same feeder and the scaled pictures with the photoshopped images on them, other than that I've never seen any more.

Exactly there is no smoking gun photo that shows the creature as a Bear…..

 

There is no photo of a mangy Bear that replicates what is seen in the pictures for that matter. (Mange simply causes hair loss and muscle and tissue density loss, due to starvation, poor animals, from mites)

 

I am more than happy to be wrong. And I will re-examine my position if new photos are produced.

[Foxhill]

Looks familiar.....

[Patterson-Gimlin]

23 hours ago, Foxhill said:

Looks familiar.....

Very much so.

[norseman]

I didn’t know what I was looking at. But now that I do know? It’s not even close.

 

 

[Grubfingers]

Head to toe identical Jacob upper left to Siamang Ape lower right.

[Patterson-Gimlin]

Not identical at all. 

Blurry bear and a gibbon. 

[Grubfingers]

1 hour ago, Patterson-Gimlin said:

Not identical at all. 

Blurry bear and a gibbon. 

Should be simple to do that better with a bear photo then on both images. It’s been years now everyone is still waiting.

[Patterson-Gimlin]

Actually most have moved on from these misidentified bear photos. 

 

[Grubfingers]

36 minutes ago, Patterson-Gimlin said:

Actually most have moved on from these misidentified bear photos. 

 

Or is it the Juvenile Sasquatch that has been misidentified as a bear?

 

[Patterson-Gimlin]

27 minutes ago, Grubfingers said:

Or is it the Juvenile Sasquatch that has been misidentified as a bear?

 

Not a good source. Meldrum said in an interview that it was a bear. 

[zendog]

20 minutes ago, Patterson-Gimlin said:

Not a good source. Meldrum said in an interview that it was a bear. 

It always was a bear. There's no doubt. All the other wishful thinking are flights of fancy

 

[Grubfingers]

1 hour ago, Patterson-Gimlin said:

Not a good source. Meldrum said in an interview that it was a bear. 

That interview altered the original photo (left) darkened the body and brightened pareidolia (right photo) on the side of the left leg to deceitfully represent it as a bear tail!

[Grubfingers]

Its body position has been identified from the belly line that exposes where part of the right leg comes down from the other side.

[CelticKevin]

I'm still not sure on these photos. I'm now 80% sick, mangy bear and 20% "no clue".