Guest Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 Im not meaning to be rude, but this thread almost seems like a classic case of trolling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotter Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 I think bigfoot (if it exists) is a relict homonid that has continually evolved to fit nicely within the niche it inhabits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 Thanks, Cotter, for a real answer. Assuming the mods have this thread under control, I will post a real answer also. I have come to believe that Bigfoots are relict hominids (homins) who branched off the family bush the same time apes went one way, humans went another and BF went a third about a million years ago, possibly building on some of those Miocene ape lines. I think humans have evolved to inhabit lowlands, bigfoots the mountains and monkeys & apes the jungles of this planet. We humans are sentient, bigfoots are sentient and I hope to god that dogmen from the ape/monkey/baboon line are NOT sentient, lol. My two cents, and conjecture that seems to make sense to me at this time. It's an evolving idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 Well at least I found one thread that I don't hve to check back in on. Cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 The jury is still out for me. I think it's either a duck or a lizard. Don't ask me why, I'm high on "myself". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 Truman Show 2...Legend of the Sasquatch? You're right, bro. Your hypothesis is probably spot on! Did Squatches make Giza, too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted November 13, 2012 SSR Team Share Posted November 13, 2012 Hehe I will but only before you answer this question, In all the bigfoot sightings reported, do you believe that everyone is lying? Or that most are lying? Or do you think the question is irrelevant whether bigfoot is real or not? It's not relevant to me at all, no.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 Ummm yea...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salubrious Posted November 13, 2012 Moderator Share Posted November 13, 2012 I doubt they are CGI... One would have to explain how I could see one in the brights of my headlights, and CGI ain't it. That would require a pretty big screen, and I think that would have been visible. They are very much living (and apparently), breathing beings. And despite their reclusive nature, very big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotter Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 LOL Art! Plus from me for the facepalm montage!! Nice one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kampz Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 Thanks for posting your own theories. Now we can debate. There's 1.119 sightings (according to the BFRO) and probably a whole lot more from California to Washington. It's a insanely small area that's populated and it's not some third world town in the Congo. Yet there's zero evidence accept word of mouth and plaster cast. What is it? The Mountain Gorilla? Was the last largest land mammal discovered back in 1902? They live in large dense jungles. If you think something so large can hide in America well then that's you. Forget the pacific northwest, what about every state accept Hawaii. Rhode Island? Really? Deserts in Arizona? Cmon. Your backyard in a suburb? Sheesh. It really is the only way. Technology is to advanced. Head palms to you pfft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 I just can't resist watching a potential train wreck happening here: This thread might get very entertaining. Or locked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 Well at least I found one thread that I don't hve to check back in on. Cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kampz Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 I doubt they are CGI... One would have to explain how I could see one in the brights of my headlights, and CGI ain't it. That would require a pretty big screen, and I think that would have been visible. They are very much living (and apparently), breathing beings. And despite their reclusive nature, very big. Maybe our eyes are the screen and our brains are working the "cgi". I use the word CGI very loosely. I have no idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Luckyfoot Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 Was the last largest land mammal discovered back in 1902? . Head palms to you pfft I'll take the Bili Ape for a thousand Alex.....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bili_ape In 2001, an international team of scientists, including George Schaller of the Wildlife Conservation Society and Mike Belliveau of Harvard University were recruited by Karl Ammann to search for the elusive Bili ape, but the venture came up empty. I think they finally confirmed one last year in '11 Not the largest land mammal found, but they've been looking for it for a long time and just recently found it. 300 lb apes y'all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts