roguefooter Posted July 9, 2015 Share Posted July 9, 2015 Victims of Ted Bundy? That is absolutely true as far as I know however, what you failed to note was that Theodore Bundy also had a Michigan connection since he was suspected of several university co-ed murders here too. In the report you’re referring to points to the remains that were partial, meaning detached and not intact. Rigor and deterioration slows down in cooler temps. To that end, I am not aware that Teddy was practicing cannibalism were you? Washington temps are more moderate in summer seasons depending on where you are at, than say, a closed up house in summertime Michigan, where deterioration and decomposition is rapid. Bundy admitted to dismemberment, and the bodies were discovered the previous summer before any 'Bigfoot tracks' were found. There is no connection between the two. Nobody said anything about cannibalism but you. All you're doing here is creating more fictional Bigfoot stories. The report also implied these two females weren’t the only bodies found in the area. The bodies in the report you commented on were also found in company of large non-human footprints. Some at least large 16 inches and five inches wide, and made no mention wolves or bears. Furthermore, the report as you know didn’t say the prolific serial killer Bundy, who standing at only 5’10 inches was never noted for extraordinarily large feet when he was captured. That in and of itself would be an oddity of nature likely to attract attention. With his predilection in alleged pornography and women it would be impossible to find time for anything else and he had never been connected with hoaxing Bigfoot tracks either so sorry, try again. Not all of Bundy's victims were identified, hence the other body. Again there is no correlation between any Bigfoot tracks and these dead decomposing women. Zero. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 9, 2015 Share Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) Bundy admitted to dismemberment, and the bodies were discovered the previous summer before any 'Bigfoot tracks' were found. There is no connection between the two. Nobody said anything about cannibalism but you. All you're doing here is creating more fictional Bigfoot stories. Not all of Bundy's victims were identified, hence the other body. Again there is no correlation between any Bigfoot tracks and these dead decomposing women. Zero. Your living a dream of nothing to see but no peeking and denial friend... pay your dues get into the business and put in 25 years and experience the seedy underworld and learn a little more then come back and school me, I would be all ears until then the conversation with you is over. Capiche? Edited July 9, 2015 by Gumshoeye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roguefooter Posted July 9, 2015 Share Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) ^Sorry but I have yet to see what your 'experience' and 'dues' have produced, aside from imaginative stories of Bigfoot and cannibalism. The "seedy underworld" of Bigfoot. Edited July 9, 2015 by roguefooter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonehead74 Posted July 9, 2015 Share Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) I believe he is referring to his oft mentioned law enforcement career, Rogue. Edited July 9, 2015 by Bonehead74 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roguefooter Posted July 9, 2015 Share Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) ^It doesn't sound like that career produced very much if he's categorizing Ted Bundy victims under "Bigfoot Attacks". Edited July 9, 2015 by roguefooter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonehead74 Posted July 9, 2015 Share Posted July 9, 2015 You're obviously on the wrong side of the thin blue line. "Pick up that can, citizen, and don't question my authoritah!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonehead74 Posted July 9, 2015 Share Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) I would hope that it would come to a mutual respect.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIekhk4NDA4&feature=player_detailpage Just like the ending of this movie. Yes ,I would be in tears too knowing what I did. In the movie he shot this animal for the good of the species so that it would not be hunted no more. The people hunting these animal were these Rich investors, trophy hunters I believe but am not sure since I only seen the ending. I seen that ending and how that creature looked at the hunter and bowed down, like saying "take me I am yours now" then he shot. At first I thought for sure that he would let it walk, but no he took the shot with out thought. Clean shot and then he took the animals ashes and spread it among the wilderness, that I thought was cool. Kind a of makes me wonder if I am ever presented with a shot. Will I be able to take that shot like what this actor did in this movie. I have practice so much on live deer when they have come in. But have never shot at them, they were not the size I was looking for. Then I wondered that maybe these deer were sent in by them to size me up. To see the type of person I was and how I would react.The truth I have always stayed calm with the deer even when I aimed on them and drew back on bow to practice. But a Bigfoot well that could cause one to have that buck fever when that one gets when that big buck comes in for a draw. I wish I could have seen this movie from the beginning. It would have been nice to have seen the whole movie. ShadowBorn, You need to watch the rest of the movie to understand the ending. Martin doesn't kill the tiger to save the species since he knows it is the last one in existence. He kills it to spite the RedLeaf Company and cremates the remains to ensure no DNA could be retrieved by them. By destroying the tiger, he also hopes to prevent anyone else being killed by the company while in pursuit of the tiger. Another motivation was pity. Martin and Lucy have a conversation where Lucy states that because the tiger is the last of its kind and alone without a mate, it was better to put it down than let it live in loneliness. Edited July 10, 2015 by Bonehead74 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAfooter Posted July 10, 2015 Admin Share Posted July 10, 2015 Thanks for those links rouge. I did not realize that they, or at least some of them, had gotten involved in the discussion. I stopped reading their forum many years ago... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowBorn Posted July 10, 2015 Moderator Author Share Posted July 10, 2015 Thank you Bonehead74 I kind of figured it was some thing like that, what can I say it was 3:00 am and could not sleep so watch parts of that and Frasier. Go figure, I knew I should have drank that bottle of Patron Teq I would have watch it more. But I thought about Bigfoot when I saw it and that is what amazed me about the movie. If I was placed in that same position I would have done the same thing. You can call it a mercy kill. Now about Ted Bundy murders, If there were prints there chances are that it was just passing or might of even witness the murder.. Imagine that, these creature will not get involve with our human affairs like murder. It does make you wonder if this creature saw what happen, decided to take a stroll by the crime seen and walk away. Any thing is possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagniAesir Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hunter_(2011_Australian_film) SPOILER ALERT The link above is about the movie you talked about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ChasingRabbits Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 It was presented as a Bigfoot attack, hence the words "Bigfoot Attacks" at the top of the article in post #8. Notice how Gumshoeye is still clinging to this notion. That might precede the paragraph, but no where within the account does it even imply that Big Foot killed those women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SoFla Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Nope, they're definitely the group. Just go back to their forums to around 2009-2010 and you'll find loads and loads of it. Me and Bill Miller had a lot of discussion with Lansdale (aka Monster Hunter) and his ridiculous conspiracy theories. Here's a few gems: http://www.network54.com/Forum/23217/message/1261606602/A+call+for+John+Green+to+take+a+polygraph+%21%21%21%21 http://www.network54.com/Forum/23217/message/1266691120/Bluff+Creek+justice http://www.network54.com/Forum/23217/message/1282352043/Motive+for+Massacre http://www.network54.com/Forum/23217/message/1282489676/Greed%2C+money...the+evil+behind+Bluff+Creek... http://www.network54.com/Forum/23217/message/1283357021/Labor+Day+weekend...the+beginning+of+the+Bluff+Creek+Incident... There's just months and months of their garbage massacre theories blasting John Green and everyone else they thought were involved. Good people don't tell bogus stories on the internet and attack real people like John Green over dumb conspiracy theories. Yeah I'm sure they killed one, heck probably killed 100 of them. Yeah that sounds better- but then the crazy hungry Sasquatch came and ate them all up and swallowed all their bones! hey!! Look over here!! No! Look over there!! BOOO!! Hey I told you to look here! What a load of crap that post was-what are talking about dude? Look, if you want to find out about the killing of a bigfoot go find it on Sasquatch Chronicles where it was told on two different occasions. Now if you want to call people bad because of some idiotic stuff posted on the internet on some website from the turn of the century I ain't playing. I am going by what I was told by a person who was there. You are probably just another one of the people that I have been reading on this forum who is in some leadership role who is doing their best to make every single person who believes in the existence of these creatures feel stupid-I ain't playing-believe what you want-I will too. Let me ask you one simple question and with your answer then we can decide whether or not to continue on our discussion or not; Do you believe in the existence of the creature or creatures known as bigfoot or sasquatch Roguefooter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonehead74 Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 That might precede the paragraph, but no where within the account does it even imply that Big Foot killed those women. That juxtaposition doesn't seem at all disingenuous to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ChasingRabbits Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 That juxtaposition doesn't seem at all disingenuous to you? Which one? The misleading title or the poor reading comprehension? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonehead74 Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Why would Gumshoeye list a story that does not describe an attack by bigfoot under the heading "Bigfoot attacks"? If I was a more cynical person I might think that the purpose was to take advantage of poor reading comprehension and lead the reader to associate the discovery of the bodies of the victims of a confessed serial killer and possible sasquatch footprints found in the same area half a year (or more) later, with "Bigfoot attacks" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts