Guest mitchw Posted June 6, 2012 Posted June 6, 2012 (edited) I got to admit, seeing CNN get hoaxed again would have it's amusement value. Edited June 6, 2012 by mitchw
Guest Particle Noun Posted June 6, 2012 Posted June 6, 2012 CNN wasn't involved in the hoax. They were one of the many duped. I'm talking about the many people, under NDA, who have none the less expressed great confidence in the findings, which none of them are allowed to elaborate on. The Biscaridi hoax had three people involved in actually perpetrating it. If this is a hoax, there are a much large number of people involved, which makes the likelyhood of a hoax much less, in my opinion.
Guest Posted June 6, 2012 Posted June 6, 2012 I'm not trying to run Ketchum down..I've been a supporter and would love to see the DNA paper come out....as I stated IF it is a hoax I have some crow to eat.
Guest Particle Noun Posted June 6, 2012 Posted June 6, 2012 I hear you. I'm not actually tryin' to come down on you, sorry. I just hear a lot the binary thinking of "if this doesn't come out soon, it's a hoax", and I think it's important to note the more likely middle scenario of rejected publication of an honest attempt at research.
Guest Posted June 6, 2012 Posted June 6, 2012 well if 3 people can dupe CNN....maybe some researchers could be duped as well? ... I don't need the DNA paper to prove it to me...but It sure would be nice to be validated ...I personally think even if it comes out it might not be the be all end all proof people think it is
Guest Shaun Posted June 6, 2012 Posted June 6, 2012 I think we will still be having the as,e discussions this time next week.
chelefoot Posted June 6, 2012 Posted June 6, 2012 In response to: What happen to the other page? Cant seem to find it now. She wrote: Melba Ketchum I decided to unpub for awhile as I have no time to answer people plus we continue to have problems with posers. It will go back up in the future but until I catch up, wouldn't you all prefer that I am working on things to forward this research? No need to speculate why she took it down. She explained why.
Guest Posted June 7, 2012 Posted June 7, 2012 The new popular "Evidence" blog full of gossip and unmoderated hateful rude people commenting kinda wears her out with all the fake Sally and fake Melba posters.
Guest Posted June 7, 2012 Posted June 7, 2012 she did say that she was going to post on her FB site when the embargo will be released, I wondering if the litigation hit a brick wall, so she really has nothing to post.
Guest Posted June 7, 2012 Posted June 7, 2012 Is there litigation pending for sure ? I am not second guessing really , just curious how solid this information is . I have heard it more than a few times recently .
Guest Posted June 7, 2012 Posted June 7, 2012 All I saw on her personal FB today was "All is well...." and a later comment asking if it would be out this year. She replied and confirmed " This year "
JDL Posted June 7, 2012 Posted June 7, 2012 MK isn't the only one who's gone dark. There are certain prominent posters who have been regulars on this thread to the point of several posts per day who haven't posted here in over a week.
Guest Thepattywagon Posted June 7, 2012 Posted June 7, 2012 Her reply of "this year" is the first time she has narrowed down the timeline to this degree, is it not?
Guest Posted June 7, 2012 Posted June 7, 2012 I'm just saying ...... I can not believe that the third post after Melba took down her FaceBook page would mention HOAX...... Get a grip Skeps and disbelievers... None of this would be happening if the leaks had not occurred...
Recommended Posts