Guest Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 (edited) I'm with you. Of course when it does roll over, yawn, and walk away, it might turn out that it is a very clear piece of footage after all. I still think there is a great chance that they purposely released a very ambiguous frame-grab from an excellent piece of video. Edited September 1, 2011 by FuriousGeorge Removed quote from preceding post
Guest HairyGreek Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 I still think it looks like a pottery barn flokati rug balled up on the forest floor. Classic...rofl.
Incorrigible1 Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 I can't help thinking I've heard this old song and dance routine before.
Guest Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 I think I can see fingers, but I'm not sure. I see the bigfoot lying on her left side and you can see the right arm coming forward and down in front of her head. I can't figure out why the face looks so off, but if you look closely I think the fingers of its left hand are in front of the face. I think I see the hand slightly curled up and the palm is facing the camera. Her face is sort of looking down into the back of her left hand and the palm of her right hand, although I can't really see the right hand. I don't know how to make a photo with it circled or I would post it. Can anyone else see what I'm talking about? If you click on and enlarge the photo I posted you should be able to see it. I really do think I can see the palm side(no hair) of her fingers.
BobbyO Posted September 1, 2011 SSR Team Posted September 1, 2011 This cannot be understated. For a man to go through all of that just to perpetrate a hoax, he would be certifiable. He should either be commended or Baker-acted. It really does not make sense, to the point that it would be virtually unfathomable. Certainly no easier to believe than the idea that the animal could actually exist. Jon, make no mistake, the idea that the Animal doesn't exist should be MUCH more tougher to accept for people..
Guest Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 (edited) Well, even though I am a believer, I understand why some would have trouble believing in BFs existence. However, I just don't see how anyone could think this was a reasonable alternative. Edited September 2, 2011 by Jodie edited to remove quote
BobbyO Posted September 1, 2011 SSR Team Posted September 1, 2011 (edited) Oh me too completely, a million times over in fact.. & if it wasn't for about 40 seconds back in the early 90's i wouldn't be anywhere near this Forum.. But i meant specifically with regards to what you wrote previous anyway, about the EP.. Edited September 2, 2011 by Jodie edit to remove quote
Guest Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 (edited) So you've seen one- what would you say is the best photographic representation of what you saw? Edited September 2, 2011 by Jodie edited out quote
BobbyO Posted September 2, 2011 SSR Team Posted September 2, 2011 (edited) Photographs of alleged BF's ?? None to be honest John i don't think, off the top of my head anyway.. Edited September 2, 2011 by Jodie edited out quote
Guest Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 (edited) No photos? Videos? Patty? Here's the new Sylvanic pic, looks a lot like Patty... Anything? Edited September 2, 2011 by Jodie edited out quotes
Guest Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 Hey y'all, try not quote the person directly above you, just reply please, so that we can save bandwidth. Thanks!!
Guest LAL Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 That hair/fur looks so familiar but I can't place it. This is buffalo:
Guest Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 No photos? Videos? Patty? Here's the new Sylvanic pic, looks a lot like Patty... Anything? Obvious fake! It's probably not a mask, but photoshopped.
Recommended Posts