hiflier Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 46 minutes ago, MIB said: Understand this very clearly: I am not saying her WORK was wrong or the other labs' work was wrong, Correct, even Dr. Haskell Hart in a 2020 interview on Monster X about his book, Sasquatch Genome Project: A Failed Study, said the study had probably shown Sasquatch DNA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, hiflier said: There was also a sort of Catch-22 loop going on. The reviewers wanted Ketchum to tell them what organism the samples originated from. Ketchum, of course, was using the data to prove an unrecognized organism existed. So in reality, she could not provide a scientifically known/recognized organism as the source of the samples and data. It became circular where the reviewers insisted she provide the source of the data, but she was using the data to prove the source of the data existed. The conundrum never got resolved. They demand the carcass on the slab. But if you shoot one, you're unethical. They simply will not allow these creatures to exist. It's a game. Edited June 11, 2023 by Huntster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 1 hour ago, norseman said: .........The rejection is that her work wasn’t published…. Dude. Well, it ended up published, didn't it? I read it. I quote it. I reference it. You reject it? Okay. Now let's see you make it go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 9 minutes ago, Huntster said: Well, it ended up published, didn't it? I read it. I quote it. I reference it. You reject it? Okay. Now let's see you make it go away. NO! IT NEVER GOT PUBLISHED! It got posted online by her own website that was a $30 pay per view site! It has more in common with midget porn than it does science! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 6 minutes ago, norseman said: NO! IT NEVER GOT PUBLISHED!........ To "publish": Quote ........prepare and issue (a book, journal, piece of music, etc.) for public sale, distribution, or readership........ It was published. Just not to your liking. I've read it. I've read the peer reviews and the responses. I can link and reference it. I can quote it. I can print it on my printer. You cannot do so with any purported rejection by Nature. What you have is exactly what the National Forest System and California Dept. of Fish and Game published about the PG film: Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Which is exactly what they want you to have. Quote .......It got posted online by her own website that was a $30 pay per view site!........ Was Nature going to publish fo free? Do you have a free subscription to Nature? I didn't pay anybody for access to the Sasquatch Genome Project documents. Here, try again. https://sasquatchgenomeproject.org Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incorrigible1 Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 12 minutes ago, Huntster said: To "publish": It was published. Just not to your liking. I've read it. I've read the peer reviews and the responses. I can link and reference it. I can quote it. I can print it on my printer. You cannot do so with any purported rejection by Nature. What you have is exactly what the National Forest System and California Dept. of Fish and Game published about the PG film: Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Which is exactly what they want you to have. Was Nature going to publish fo free? Do you have a free subscription to Nature? I didn't pay anybody for access to the Sasquatch Genome Project documents. Here, try again. https://sasquatchgenomeproject.org Are you being deliberately obstinate? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Incorrigible1 said: Are you being deliberately obstinate? Yes, I am: Quote ........stubbornly refusing to change one's opinion or chosen course of action, despite attempts to persuade one to do so. And I'm not the only one doing so. Need I define "deliberate", too?........... Edited June 11, 2023 by Huntster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 @norseman Is this not published? http://www.themunnsreport.com If not peer reviewed, is it invalid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 Ok, so let’s “discover” a new species. First we need a website. https://www.squarespace.com/website-design/?channel=pnb&subchannel=go&campaign=pnb-go-us-en-core_website_builderalone_tier1-e&subcampaign=(website-builder-alone_website-builder_e)&&cid=13842267332&aid=125919728298&tid=aud-295956616929:kwd-25064430&mt=e&eid=&loc_p_ms=9033761&loc_i_ms=&nw=g&d=c&adid=532615442832&channel2=pnb&subchannel2=go&gad=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIvYTI1c26_wIVohutBh0jpw71EAAYAiAAEgIMyvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds Ok. I spent my 99 bucks and I have registered www.manbearpig.com And now I need to of course profit from this discovery so I added a shopping cart. But I need something to sell for 30 bucks! But before I get people to buy my product I need to pump up my product…. So I bought a costume for 39.99 and took a bunch of pictures of my cousins kid in the back yard…..I named the creature “Gertrude”. Because nothing says man bear pig like oldsie woman’s names….. https://www.walmart.com/ip/Amscan-Kids-Chewbacca-Costume-Child-Size-Medium-8-10/705185956?wmlspartner=wlpa&selectedSellerId=101355701 Now! The paper, the paper, I don’t need to spend much time on it because I’ve already got their dough in hand before they lay eyes on it! So! Wallah! For 24.99 I bought a book! https://www.amazon.com/Genetics-Dummies-Lisa-Spock/dp/1119633036/ref=sr_1_1?hvadid=580750261103&hvdev=c&hvlocphy=9033761&hvnetw=g&hvqmt=e&hvrand=10405900413500972475&hvtargid=kwd-142836136&hydadcr=22560_13493318&keywords=genetics+for+dummies&qid=1686466128&sr=8-1 So I only need to dupe like 6 people! Everything after that is GRAVY!🤑 Isn't science GREAT!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 2 minutes ago, Huntster said: @norseman Is this not published? http://www.themunnsreport.com If not peer reviewed, is it invalid? NO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 13 minutes ago, norseman said: NO! NO! as in "it's not published", and/or NO! as in "it's not peer reviewed, and thus invalid"? NO! to both questions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 29 minutes ago, norseman said: Ok, so let’s “discover” a new species......... .........www.manbearpig.com......... ...........Now! The paper, the paper, I don’t need to spend much time on it because I’ve already got their dough in hand before they lay eyes on it! So! Wallah! For 24.99 I bought a book!........... So I only need to dupe like 6 people! Everything after that is GRAVY!🤑 Isn't science GREAT!? Wait! You're missing the dna analyzed by 11 different labs, independently, and blind. When you add that to your book, I'll gladly read it. My daughter and her family are eyeball deep in peccaries right now near Tucson. Some of them might be manpigs!........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 2 minutes ago, Huntster said: ………My daughter and her family are eyeball deep in peccaries right now near Tucson. Some of them might be manpigs!........ IMG_2084.MOV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 4 minutes ago, Huntster said: NO! as in "it's not published", and/or NO! as in "it's not peer reviewed, and thus invalid"? NO! to both questions? Neither. The premise of your question is flawed. Bill Munns is not presenting a novel species to science. A Kodak 16mm camera is not a living species. You know I love you? But I cannot talk to you about biology. I’ve tried every angle I can think of to get you to see what is wrong with Melba Ketchum! Either you lack the understanding. Or you will not admit it.🤷♂️ And lastly? I want this discovery as bad as anyone here. And maybe this is why I cannot stand the Ketchum’s of the world. It’s like asking for a red Ryder BB gun for Christmas. And when Christmas morning comes? And I rip open the bright shiny gift? Inside there is a card board cut out of a red Ryder BB gun….🤨 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 Can we send a sample for your DNA analysis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts