Guest Skunkapetracker Posted April 19, 2014 Posted April 19, 2014 I have checked out your website and look forward to learning what you find in your research investigations. Can you elaborate a little more on the urban sightings you have investigated? Were these in or near smaller cities in Florida and did it appear that the Skunk Apes were looking for food when they came into the urban area? Thanks for checking out my website! What immediately springs to mind is the Wesley Chapel area Northwest of I-75 in the Cypress Creek flood area. There are a few small communities that border it. I have gone out there twice to investigate sightings and sounds. I found a few impression tracks that moved further North and East into the flood area, where there are definitely more food and water resources to take advantage of. However, this area is rather small to support multiple Skunk Apes, as the multiple sightings would suggest. My theory is that I am seeing a West to East migration towards the Green Swamp Wilderness area, where a small family of Skunk Apes could live rather well concealed. I have not gathered enough evidence yet to put anything solid behind my theory yet, but I am heading out there in June to do more field research.
Lake County Bigfooot Posted April 22, 2014 Author Posted April 22, 2014 Just curious SAT (SkunkApeTracker) have you any knowledge of sightings or vocalizations near Port Saint Lucie on the Everglades side. When I was down there for some of my PGA training I explored a few back roads at night and saw some eye shine that looked quite tall and spread out, but it was about 1/4 mile away and was gone in a few seconds. Any way that area has no real sighting data, and I wonder if it is too far south without enough forested areas, or is that a misnomer as it is in other parts of the country.
Guest DWA Posted April 22, 2014 Posted April 22, 2014 (edited) DWA, I could claim to be able to divine the truthfulness of an anonymous internet report just by reading it like some on here do but we all know that's impossible. I sure hope I'd never be classified as one of those people. One report is nothing. Ten, nothing. I could make up a pretty cool report. But all the evidence I am aware of, ALL of it, being the result of something other than what it purports to be? What would I bet on that? I'd treasure a wood nickel too much to give it up on that bet. As WSA puts it, people aren't that good, and we know it. And that's what the scientist has to do, when the evidence falls short of absolute proof: make a bet, and follow the bet. No one who isn't thoroughly interested in this topic can get a PowerPoint that would satisfy him...although many here aren't, and think they can. Edited April 22, 2014 by DWA
dmaker Posted April 22, 2014 Posted April 22, 2014 ^^ Anecdotes, regardless of how many, do not fall short of absolute proof. They are not even in the same ballpark. "No one who isn't thoroughly interested in this topic can get a PowerPoint that would satisfy him... " DWA What does that mean? Only people who are really into bigfoot can truly appreciate the value of the "evidence"? Well, yes anyone who is emotionally invested in one outcome over the other can get as much confirmation bias as one wants while deep diving into the BFRO database. That much should be very obvious. 2
Guest Skunkapetracker Posted April 23, 2014 Posted April 23, 2014 Just curious SAT (SkunkApeTracker) have you any knowledge of sightings or vocalizations near Port Saint Lucie on the Everglades side. When I was down there for some of my PGA training I explored a few back roads at night and saw some eye shine that looked quite tall and spread out, but it was about 1/4 mile away and was gone in a few seconds. Any way that area has no real sighting data, and I wonder if it is too far south without enough forested areas, or is that a misnomer as it is in other parts of the country. That area of Florida would not really be ideal. Along the river maybe, and a little further East by the coast. Owl eye shine can lead to misidentification if they are sitting on a low enough branch.
Lake County Bigfooot Posted April 24, 2014 Author Posted April 24, 2014 (edited) Ok SAT, the river part makes sense, as far as you know the Miami area inland is dead? or is there activity in the Everglades? I am eventually moving to Central Florida, need to be about an hour from Tampa...any suggestions around that area. I know there have been sightings north in ChiefLand, and around that green belt that has the springs running into the gulf. It will be hard to leave this house and the local Squatches, as they are my first experience. Do not know if I will ever get that rush again, it was like a whole new world was before me. I guess it reinvigorated my sense of wonder. I had thought I experienced most everything and then.......well the rest is history. Edited April 24, 2014 by Lake County Bigfooot
ohiobill Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 I sure hope I'd never be classified as one of those people. One report is nothing. Ten, nothing. I could make up a pretty cool report. But all the evidence I am aware of, ALL of it, being the result of something other than what it purports to be? What would I bet on that? I'd treasure a wood nickel too much to give it up on that bet. As WSA puts it, people aren't that good, and we know it. And that's what the scientist has to do, when the evidence falls short of absolute proof: make a bet, and follow the bet. No one who isn't thoroughly interested in this topic can get a PowerPoint that would satisfy him...although many here aren't, and think they can. Of course you are one of those people...you are basing your whole belief in the subject on it. One, ten, ten thousand - what's the difference? How do I know you haven't made up many of the reports? What safeguards are in place to keep you from doing so? They are unverifiable and can't be trusted or tested. Do you believe in fairies due to the existence of sighting reports in Iceland? How about alien UFO sightings worldwide? Chupacabra? They don't even provide a starting point for further examination much less something concrete to argue over. I agree people aren't always good - there are liars and hoaxers out there. Some will even state that calling 911 won't get a response to a call for help. It doesn't matter whether they are deliberately lying or unknowingly ignorant they are still wrong when they make such a statement and it's easy enough to prove unlike tracking down an anonymous bigfoot report where the best possible outcome is "it's possible". Science CAN'T follow the evidence because it can't be trusted - simple as that. Evidence is testable and repeatable, not anonymous and anecdotal - even if it's on a bigfoot PowerPoint presented by Dr. Bindernagel. When the sightings reports/databases are used to allow Norseman or NAWAC to be in the right place at the right time to bring in a specimen for examination or Dr. Bindernagel to film a bigfoot in high def you can rightfully claim them as testable and repeatable evidence. Until then you only have stories which so far have been useless in obtaining any hard evidence and don't even rise to the results you'd expect from a part-time hunting or fishing guide. 2
Lake County Bigfooot Posted May 10, 2014 Author Posted May 10, 2014 (edited) Well I have not been posting as much do to my work schedule, and generally having nothing new to add. Yesterday I had a talk with my neighbor, I have only 4 on my little section of marsh. The one directly to my left lives next to the small wooded area I heard what I believe was a mother sasquatch responding to her juvenile who was between our yards. I think he is exposed to the phenomena but doesn't speak of it openly, having grown up on an orchard in the south with only farm and mostly open lands around him. I asked if he has heard anything strange at night lately and he mentioned he heard something that sounded like "chatter" coming from the woods next to his driveway at 11:30pm the other night as he arrived home, and that later he heard some other strange sounds, he said maybe cat like, but couldn't describe, so he shined a light and got eye shine behind his stick pile, they were face on, but again he didn't really elaborate. I'm trying not to push the issue too much as I know it seems uncomfortable, but I mentioned that in the south they call them boogers, and he knowingly laughed. I guess he might suspect the same thing but only would give me a little info without openly agreeing we were talking about them. I guess I better get back into the recording mode real quick here, and maybe again try to hide my Moultrie trail cam, who knows maybe they'll slip up. Also I confirmed it was not him banging on the tree at 3:30am warding off the coyotes, he said he just yells at them, as I already knew. So I am even more perplexed that a squatch would do that in the middle of the night in a semi residential area, maybe they want to stir up more than the coyotes....like me..... Edited May 10, 2014 by Lake County Bigfooot
Guest lightheart Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 LC I think they count on the fact the the whole world sleeps deeply from 1:00 am to about 4:00 am. I was really surprised to hear how much noise they were making during that time period one night. They were banging on stuff ,shouting, and just generally having a good ole time. LOL Most people are sleeping really deeply about that time. Something might wake them up but they would probably just disregard the noise and drift back to sleep. They own the night I think.
Lake County Bigfooot Posted May 11, 2014 Author Posted May 11, 2014 (edited) Good point lightheart, they probably have little concern of being discovered in those hours of the night, and I would not be surprised if they do try to mess with people who are sleeping quietly in their homes. Stan Courtney told me that just south of me someone had reported banging on their house in the night. I am guessing he might be referring to a farmer just south of me. Well anyhow it is heating up as the temps climb and buds are opening. I suspect they are or will be coming thru for a while.....so stay tuned..... Edited May 11, 2014 by Lake County Bigfooot
Lake County Bigfooot Posted May 16, 2014 Author Posted May 16, 2014 (edited) Alright so I officially started my 2014 research at about 10pm on May 15th a dark cool night, which followed a very warm stretch followed by extreme wetness and cold. What was remarkable concerning this night was the very large moon on the horizon. As I waded thru the water that grips my backyard each spring bordering the marsh I thought, "why not", exactly....why couldn't a squatch be occupying my little piece of heaven. I know that the scenario only gets better from here on out, but I cannot but ask, "why not?" Well the fact is that I started recording tonight for the first time in 2014, and I know that I said I would start earlier but I went with the gut vibe on the matter...so from here on out I hope to provide honest analysis good or bad on what I discover, and hope for your feedback on some of the recording stuff over the season. Happy hunting, or searching if you may.... Edited May 16, 2014 by Lake County Bigfooot
Lake County Bigfooot Posted May 16, 2014 Author Posted May 16, 2014 (edited) Nothing remarkable in last nights recording, a conversation between several Great Horned Owls was interesting, and one approach to the recorder that that was inconclusive as to what approached. That was 8 hours worth of recording time, takes over an hour to review. I have to limit myself somewhat do to time constraints with work and life, but rest assured I will be at it for the rest of the season till the snow flies...Last year the last couple weeks of fall were perhaps the most interesting but I had not purchased the recorder till September so who knows what summer will bring. The quest of documenting the "semi" urban bigfoot continues.. Anyone else recording of conducting research feel free to share your 2014 strategies. My goal is to somehow document their presence here, hoping for a sighting or print this season, and some recording of their interactions with each other...I might begin placing food in sealed jars to see if anything with hands is out in the night....that might lead to fingerprints... Edited May 16, 2014 by Lake County Bigfooot
Lake County Bigfooot Posted May 16, 2014 Author Posted May 16, 2014 (edited) I include this story just for interest, as it also supports the semi urban notion as far back as 1890 article taken from the news paper below "Chicago Inter Ocean"MAYWOOD’S WHAT-IS-IT.Chicago Inter OceanA Strange Creature Has Been Prowling Around the Desplaines River.Those Who Have Run Across the Thing Like It to the Traditional Wild Man.All Efforts to Hunt It to Its Haunts Have So Far Proved in Vain.IS IT THE WILD MAN OF BORNEO?Maywood has a mystery, and through it that usually peaceful little suburb bids fair tobecome quite notorious.Something over a week ago a rumor was started in Maywood that a bear or someanimal very much resembling one, had been seen on the Desplaines River bank, justbelow the village. Several times this story was repeated, and at last it wasdetermined to organize a hunting party to search for the animal. In a day or two,as the party had not materialized, those who intended to go made up their mindsthat they had been hoaxed, and so the entire matter was dropped.Christmas day the Des Plaines River was crowded with skaters. They covered the icefrom Harlem to Turner Park, and were happy as they were numerous. In the crowdthat kept close to the Northwestern railroad bridge, between River Forest andMaywood, was a party of young people from North Clark street. Charles Gardner, aclerk on the Board of Trade, was one of the number, and as he was anxious not tomiss the next train he went ashore below the railroad bridge, removed his skatesand commenced to pick his way a small path which led toward the Maywood Park, this was through a very thick undergrowth, and led directly to a small bridge onFirst avenue, spanning a ravine which runs the entire length of the park, runninginto the river about two hundred feet from the small bridge.As Gardner approached the bridge he was startled by hearing what sounded tohim like a moan or a growl. Looking up he saw at the foot of one of the piers ofthe bridge something which he first took to be a man. The figure was seatedon a projecting rock and was partially concealed behind the thick weed thatsurround the spot. It was peering through the tops of the weeds, and the face,as the startled man saw it, was that of a monster. It had a low heavy brow, overwhich hung hair that was coarse and matted. Its eyebrows were heavy and long,and the head seemed to be set low down on the chest, so high and massive werethe huge shoulders. The entire face was covered with bushy hair, and as Gardinerlooked in fright and wonder, a huge arm was lifted to grasp the wall as thecreature rose. That was all the young man wanted to see. He tore his way up thesteep bank, rushed to the depot nearly half a mile away, and boarded his trainjust as it was about to leave. Then he laughed at himself. He imagined that he had probably seen someunfortunate tramp taking a rest under the bridge and had, in the excitement ofthe unexpected vision, drawn for himself the vivid picture his mind so wellretained. He said nothing at all about the matter until Sunday, when he was againat Maywood for a day’s skating. With a few friends he met on the ice he landednear the spot, picked his way to the bridge, and related what he had seen. Ofcourse he was laughed at until some in the party ventured under the bridgewhere they saw, lying among the some small rocks, two pieces of raggedclothing. Other traces were also visible of the place having been recentlyvisited by something, and Gardner’s story was at once believed.In the mean time the mysterious creature had been seen and heard by other people. JohnHaberlein, Hans Monns, and Sam Hamburg, three Germans living near TurnerPark, had heard from some boys that some wolves or bears were prowlingup and down the river. Friday they started out with guns and dogs andcarefully scoured both banks of the river from Turner Park almost to Harlem,but they saw nothing alive, although in the sand on the river bank, nearHarlem, they ran across some strange looking footprints, which led from the iceto the bank of the river. These tracks resembled somewhat those of a bear, butthe peculiar imprints of the toes at once proved that they were not made by anyBruin in existence. The hunters followed these footprints until they were lost inthe weeds, and a thorough search of every nook and ravine in the vicinity failedto bring to light the object which made the marks. The hunters told their storyin Maywood, and the people who had before heard of the mysterious prowlingthing were now thoroughly alarmed, and in many instances parents forbadechildren skating on the river, so afraid were they that the animal, or man, orwhatever it was, might do some injury to the little folks.Late last Saturday night Henry Phillips and R.A. Lewis, two young me whoboard in River Forest, went over to Maywood to call on some young ladies.They were walking home after their visit and when on the West Lake streetwagon bridge, stopped to look at a passenger train that was crossing therailroad bridge just below. They saw the train pass, and then looked up anddown the river. The moon was shining brightly, and the reflected glitterfrom the ice made the picture a pretty one,As the two young men leaned over the railing of the bridge and discussed the possibilities of the icelosing its charm for skaters, one of them happened to look up the river.Above the bridge about a half mile is a bend in the river. It is whereMr. E.C. Waller’s beautiful home rests on the bank of the Desplaines River.The action of the current here in this bend is gradually wearing away thebank, and Mr. Waller is constructing a huge wall to protect his property.Dams are erected there, but the work on the wall has ceased for the wintermonths. Around these dams on the ice lie boards and barrels and piecesof stone, mixed up in the confusion in which they were left when theworkmen stopped. The moonlight, shining on the ice, was broken at thesedams, the shadows of the trees and rocks and boards at the bend givinga pretty contrast to the glimmer of the rest of river’s frozen surface.As the two young men watched the ice they saw a movement on the icysurface at the bend. Without being aware that the other was looking at themoving object each watched the figure until they broke out at the sameinstant with a remark that some fellow must like skating very well to beout alone at that time of night.They both laughed, and as they did the figure drew away from the bendand made its way down the river toward the two watchers. It came veryslowly and appeared to be carrying something. As it approached thebridge the young men could see very distinctly that it was not a skater.It took long, regular, but very slow strides, and at each step a clackingsound could be heard as is some loose shoe sole was coming in contactwith the smooth ice at every step. On the shoulder of the ***** lookingfigure was a piece of board, and as it slouched along the young mencarefully watched. The moonlight was brilliant, and as the object drewnearer and nearer the bridge the general outline became more andmore distinct.The reflection from the ice threw its ray on the features of the strangelooking midnight marauder, and as it came nearer and nearer to theyoung men they were almost horror-stricken at its appearance. Thefigure was that of a man, big, brawny and muscular, but whethercovered with hair or clothes was hard to discern. It wore no hat, andits white hands, as one hung by its side and the other grasped theburden on its shoulder, were in great contrast to the dark face, blackhair and peculiar looking body. The head seemed scarcely higherthan the shoulders, and as the creature moved along, a peculiarhissing sound came from it, as if it were breathing through its teeth.as the fearful looking creature drew nearer. When it halted under thebridge, or a little to one side of it, and directly in full view of thewatchers, it dropped its burden. It seemed to be fearful ofsomething, and looked around in every direction. The young mencrouched on the floor of the bridge and peered cautiously overthe edge of rail. The Thing hissed and mumbled as it stood there,and Lewis became so badly frightened that he almost yelledoutright, and was only stopped by the strong hand-clasp ofhis friend.In a few moments a movement was heard on the ice. The figurehad stooped down and was replacing its load on its shoulder.After having done this it remained motionless for a fewseconds, and then moved under the bridge. It was lost to thesight of the two men for an instant, and then it emerged fromthe shadow and moved on down the river, the peculiarclacking sound being kept up. They saw it pass under therailroad bridge and watched it move on down toward Harlemuntil it was lost to view around the bend of the river justbelow.Just as Lewis and Phillips had reached the end of the bridgeon their homeward way, and were discussing the strange sightthey had seen, they were again startled by hearing a loud cry.They concluded they had seen enough for one night, and agreedthat the sound they had just heard had been made by somenight bird or animal. They were quite nervous, anyhow, and asLewis was especially anxious to go to his home, it was withdifficulty that his friend could persuade him to wait a fewmoments to see if anything would appear.They did not wait long. From under the railroad bridge shotthe same figure they had just lost sight of. It was movingrapidly, and was without the burden it had carried when lastseen. It rushed to the center of the space between the twobridges and sat or crouched on a small rock that showedabove the surface of the ice, where it remained for a fewseconds, hissing through its teeth and waving its long armsaround as if to ward off some pursuer or enemy. Only for a fewseconds did the mysterious creature remain in this position.Then it rose and slowly moved toward the west bank of theriver.IT PAUSED AGAINwhen it reached the edge of the ice, and seemed to be lookingin the direction of the two watchers, who had cautiously movednearer the center of the bridge. It seemed to shade its eyeswith a big white hand, and then, after a long pause, turned andcommenced to climb up the bank. This part of the shore wasin shadow, being covered with weeds and trees, and for sometime the creature was lost to the view of the watching andanxious men, but when it reached the top it was againeasily seen, the figure being silhouetted in bold relief againstthe white barn which stands near the top.Close to the bank of the river at this are two straw stacks ownedby Farmer Nicholson. They had been cut into, and both arepropped up by means of long poles and beams. Going to thenearest of these the figure cautiously crawled under one of theprops, arranged some straw for a pillow, and lay down. Fromwhere the two men were watching, just a dark outline of thefigure could be discerned, but it was indistinct and blurred.The young men at once started for their homes, and the nextmorning told their story to Howard Davis, a young book agent,who lives in River Forest, who it turn recited it to a reporterfor THE INNER OCEAN. Young Gardner was found by thereporter, and a visit to Maywood disclosed the fact than manyprominent persons had heard of the mysterious figure, butwere inclined not to place much credence in the theory thatthere is much of a mystery to the matter. They are inclinedto think that these people have seen a big dog or some otheranimal, and have allowed their imagination to get away withthem amid the mysterious surroundings.Mr. William Rausch, of the Maywood pharmacy, has heard sometalk about the mystery, but is inclined to think that there isnothing very dreadful about it. He does not know Lewis orPhillips, nor is acquainted with Davis, who is a reliable youngbusinessman. Others think that there is some mysterysurrounding this strange creature, and if traces of him areseen again an effort will be made to capture him.Is he one of the men who have so strangely disappeared fromChicago during the past year, or merely some able-bodiedtramp fantastically arrayed is the question asked by thosewho have come in contact with him, directly or indirectly. Edited May 16, 2014 by Lake County Bigfooot
Gotta Know Posted May 17, 2014 Posted May 17, 2014 ^^ "In a day or two, as the party had not materialized, those who intended to go made up their minds that they had been hoaxed, and so the entire matter was dropped." The 1890's you say? Perhaps the earliest report of even the hint of hoaxers that I've read about. Isn't that interesting that people even back then just couldn't believe their own eyes or reports by friends and neighbors? Such is the universal, unbelievable nature of this phenomenon, and speaks volumes to me as to why we are still dealing with such skepticism. Yes, I know I've just left myself open for the skeptics saying--aha!!--you're right, it is an unbelievable phenomenon and hoaxers HAVE been pulling your collective leg all these years. Nah. I don't buy it. I fall on the side of BF living amongst us all this time because we are too afraid of scorn and ridicule. Our OWN human nature is their hall pass. YMMV. Thanks for the post, LCB.
Recommended Posts