Jump to content

General consensus on what Bigfoot is


Grub-Girl

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Wooly Booger said:

.........Say… do you hear those black helicopters hovering? 

 

I was watching one last evening, along with a group of State Trooper vehicles at the trailhead parking lot down the hill @ a half mile away. The helicopter left the parking area and slowly flew low over the hiking trail. They were looking for something. I don't know if it was a criminal, bear, or maybe even a sasquatch. I doubt it was an alien. My bet is that a bear spooked somebody. The next tine I drive away from the house I'll drive over to see if there are fresh bear warning signs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, vinchyfoot said:

 

You know squat, you are going by a very likely imperfect historical record, so please. Until you have a sequenced genome of all classes of humanish offshoots all you are doing in your assumptions rather than basing opinion as fact is embellishment.

 

Downvotes by the abrased... truth is truth... oh well...

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vinchyfoot said:

.......Science though is a Method, not a cabal, not a religion, not an ideology........

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science

 

Quote

.......Science (from Latin scientia 'knowledge')[1] is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.[2][3][4]........

 

You are quite assertive, but I'm afraid that I will not grant you the power to define anything for me. I can read quite efficiently for myself, thanks.

 

Quote

.........it evolves as knowledge evolves thats kinda the point. Its never an absolute, it reevaluates new evidence and or data as it comes in. Those claiming its a cabal are on the leading edge of APPLIED IGNORANCE

 

You continue to twist my words as if you have some sort of right to do so.I quite clearly wrote:

 

Quote

.......Science is an ideology. Those in control of science are a cabal. .........

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, vinchyfoot said:

 

You know squat, you are going by a very likely imperfect historical record, so please. Until you have a sequenced genome of all classes of humanish offshoots all you are doing in your assumptions rather than basing opinion as fact is embellishment.

 

I am posting for you the taxonomic groupings that are scientifically accepted. You may disagree with them if you wish. I certainly do. But I can't prove anything, just like you, and just like the cabal that put that taxonomic grouping together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Huntster said:

 

I am posting for you the taxonomic groupings that are scientifically accepted. You may disagree with them if you wish. I certainly do. But I can't prove anything, just like you, and just like the cabal that put that taxonomic grouping together. 

 

And yet, its just a METHOD, not a cabal, there is no cabal, just hyperbloic nonsense claiming otherwise, and yet Q is a farce, the sky aint falling and world spins on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Huntster said:

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science

 

 

You are quite assertive, but I'm afraid that I will not grant you the power to define anything for me. I can read quite efficiently for myself, thanks.

 

 

You continue to twist my words as if you have some sort of right to do so.I quite clearly wrote:

 

 

I twisted nothing, Its a method nothing more. Next...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, vinchyfoot said:

And yet, its just a METHOD, not a cabal, there is no cabal.......

 

Just like with every other endeavor that man is involved in, there are cabals that vie for control of them. 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science

 

Quote

........Learned societies for the communication and promotion of scientific thought and experimentation have existed since the Renaissance.[190]Many scientists belong to a learned society that promotes their respective scientific discipline, profession, or group of related disciplines.[191] Membership may be open to all, may require possession of some scientific credentials, or may be an honor conferred by election.[192] Most scientific societies are non-profit organizations, and many are professional associations. Their activities typically include holding regular conferences for the presentation and discussion of new research results and publishing or sponsoring academic journals in their discipline. Some also act as professional bodies, regulating the activities of their members in the public interest or the collective interest of the membership. Scholars in the sociology of science[who?] argue that learned societies are of key importance and their formation assists in the emergence and development of new disciplines or professions.

The professionalization of science, begun in the 19th century, was partly enabled by the creation of distinguished academy of sciences in a number of countries such as the Italian Accademia dei Lincei in 1603,[193] the British Royal Society in 1660, the French Académie des Sciences in 1666,[194] the American National Academy of Sciences in 1863, the German Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in 1911, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 1928. International scientific organizations, such as the International Council for Science, have since been formed to promote cooperation between the scientific communities of different nations..........

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, vinchyfoot said:

I twisted nothing, Its a method nothing more. Next...

 

Okay. For you, there is nothing more. That is obvious to me, and I think that's very appropriate.

 

May The Method be with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Huntster said:

 

Just like with every other endeavor that man is involved in, there are cabals that vie for control of them. 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science

 

 

Your ignorance should be embarrassing, its a method, it evolves as it gets corrected. You are opposition to your own ignorance. Next...

2 minutes ago, Huntster said:

 

Okay. For you, there is nothing more. That is obvious to me, and I think that's very appropriate.

 

May The Method be with you.

 

Before you walk away into the mystical land of narnia, lion kings and lost socks, what is the color of the sky there? Im sure Q told you what to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, vinchyfoot said:

Your ignorance should be embarrassing.......

 

I should be embarrassed for continuing to debate with you, but I'm not. I'm having fun.

 

Quote

........its a method, it evolves as it gets corrected.........

 

The method evolves as it gets corrected? How so?

 

Quote

....... Next...

 

But you aren't finished with me yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Foxhill said:

At this point legend/myth/social construct IMO

can you give me a bit of insight into this opinion. Its an opinion I'm yet to encounter 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Huntster said:

 

I should be embarrassed for continuing to debate with you, but I'm not. I'm having fun.

 

 

The method evolves as it gets corrected? How so?

 

 

But you aren't finished with me yet.

You should be embarrassed because of your fail in basic reality...

Science is an evolving um... science... so what do you fail to understand....

and... your implied threat is dully noted... and earns chuckles..

 

get some....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, vinchyfoot said:

.......Before you walk away into the mystical land of narnia, lion kings and lost socks, what is the color of the sky there? Im sure Q told you what to say.

 

I'm not going anywhere. And the color of the sky here is blue today, but it's as often grey as blue, and occasionally red. Springtime in Alaska is pretty nice. Not much rain or snow.

 

Who is Q?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admin
18 minutes ago, Huntster said:

But you aren't finished with me yet.

 

You'll have to pick up the "debate" in a couple of months when Vinchy gets his posting privileges back.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, vinchyfoot said:

You should be embarrassed because of your fail in basic reality........

 

Oh, I'm a specialist in reality. I'm a full fledged realist, as opposed to a scientist (even though as an engineer I was an applied scientist).

 

Quote

........Science is an evolving um... science... so what do you fail to understand....

 

How the method evolves. Please explain it to me.

 

Quote

.......and... your implied threat is dully noted.........

 

Threat? What threat?

5 minutes ago, gigantor said:

 

You'll have to pick up the "debate" in a couple of months when Vinchy gets his posting privileges back.

 

 

Ah.......I was looking forward to learning so much more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...