Rod Posted August 18, 2011 Author Posted August 18, 2011 ... other stuff. Urine, feces, and the like.
Rod Posted August 18, 2011 Author Posted August 18, 2011 Yep, like that Rod.. Or one of those Dogs that i can't think of the name of, that are just basically a ball of fur/wool that get really matted up. I think I know what you are referring to... http://www.gopetsamerica.com/bergamasco/bergamasco.aspx
BobbyO Posted August 18, 2011 SSR Team Posted August 18, 2011 (edited) Urine, feces, and the like. I had just bit into a Banana when i read that.. Edited August 18, 2011 by BobbyO
Rod Posted August 18, 2011 Author Posted August 18, 2011 I had just bit into a Banana when i read that..
BobbyO Posted August 18, 2011 SSR Team Posted August 18, 2011 I think I know what you are referring to... http://www.gopetsamerica.com/bergamasco/bergamasco.aspx That's the one..
Guest Posted August 18, 2011 Posted August 18, 2011 I was right, it was in a fetal position. What do you think it's name is? I say we name her, Felicia.
BobbyO Posted August 18, 2011 SSR Team Posted August 18, 2011 I was right, it was in a fetal position. What do you think it's name is? I say we name her, Felicia. Her name is Matilda, honestly Rictor, no joke.. I've definately read that she has been named that by the people within the EP.
Incorrigible1 Posted August 18, 2011 Posted August 18, 2011 Until someone figures out a way to see them better or get better images, fuzzy pictures is all we really have. They're paranormal, that's all we're gonna get!
Guest billgreen2010 Posted August 18, 2011 Posted August 18, 2011 its looks like some sort of primate lying on ground but again im no expert to be continued
Rod Posted August 18, 2011 Author Posted August 18, 2011 BTW - I've seen people refer to this as a photograph. It's not. It's a frame grab from the documentary. So this is one single image of a segment where there is movement and more footage of the sleeping. You are correct. Thanks for the reminder.
Guest Posted August 18, 2011 Posted August 18, 2011 (edited) Interesting interpretations. I took it that the head was closer to the camera. It also appears to have a different hair texture than the other parts. Click on the picture to animate the outlined areas. Edited August 18, 2011 by damndirtyape
Rod Posted August 18, 2011 Author Posted August 18, 2011 Interesting interpretations. I took it that the head was closer to the camera. It also appears to have a different hair texture than the other parts. Click on the picture to animate the outlined areas. That is impressive, DDA. As it pertains to where you have the digits, I had the thought that they were there too. You may be on to something.
Guest gershake Posted August 18, 2011 Posted August 18, 2011 Thanks rwidley... holy ****! Once you see it, you'll excrete bricks. P: I was seeing something completely different until your artist's rendering. Thanks for it!
Guest gershake Posted August 18, 2011 Posted August 18, 2011 Can only see a still of DDA's animation, without any outlines...
Guest Posted August 18, 2011 Posted August 18, 2011 Ha - We already have a controversy. I don't see the digits, but that doesn't mean anything. It's really hard to make anything out. I could be completely off.
Recommended Posts