Guest believer Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 The picture is of a sleeping Sasquatch. All the rest is symantics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest slimwitless Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Yes, that makes sense. I sent her an email just to eliminate all confusion. Here's what she wrote me this morning... Sorry the photograph is copy righted and cannot be shared. But it's rather blurry image of a "sleeping" sasquatch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Here's what she wrote me this morning... Sorry the photograph is copy righted and cannot be shared. But it's rather blurry image of a "sleeping" sasquatch. Well, we'll see if they contact me. I posted the image on my blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Carl Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 (edited) i think it looks kinda cute haha very cool ! Edited August 19, 2011 by Carl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ChrisBFRPKY Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Well, we'll see if they contact me. I posted the image on my blog. Once it hit that news article, it's fair use. Chris B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BuzzardEater Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Not mentioned, yet, is that the Maple Ridge News is a little wee newspaper from a bedroom community. Why would you break a story like this in a tiny backwater? If you say,"because Vancouver doesn't have any decent papers", I'll concede the point, but there must be a better media vehicle somewhere! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FuriousGeorge Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 If that is a sasquatch, then everything I know about these animals is wrong. The entire premise of their existence and survival is off. That looks like a pretty crunchy day in the woods. The stealthiest ninja photographer would sound like he is making jiffy pop while approaching that animal in that environment. If it still snoozes through the approach, I was way off with what I thought they were like. I thought their survival was based on the fact they could detect such things. Looks like that photographer probably could have plucked a hair sample while he was there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Forbig Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 If that is a sasquatch, then everything I know about these animals is wrong. The entire premise of their existence and survival is off. That looks like a pretty crunchy day in the woods. The stealthiest ninja photographer would sound like he is making jiffy pop while approaching that animal in that environment. If it still snoozes through the approach, I was way off with what I thought they were like. I thought their survival was based on the fact they could detect such things. Looks like that photographer probably could have plucked a hair sample while he was there. That's the closest I've ever seen anyone get to one for a picture. I wouldn't want to walk up that close to any living wild animal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tracker Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 If that is a sasquatch, then everything I know about these animals is wrong. The entire premise of their existence and survival is off. That looks like a pretty crunchy day in the woods. The stealthiest ninja photographer would sound like he is making jiffy pop while approaching that animal in that environment. If it still snoozes through the approach, I was way off with what I thought they were like. I thought their survival was based on the fact they could detect such things. Looks like that photographer probably could have plucked a hair sample while he was there. True enough I see all the ground litter as well, maybe it rained? Their survival strongly depends on others in it's group and no one was watching it's back on this day. A solo Sasq off on it's own is the best opportunity to collect better evidence for personal or other reasons. JMO. tracker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted August 19, 2011 BFF Patron Share Posted August 19, 2011 I'll give it a try... Rod's got it right. If you extrapolate the top of the picture as being the back and the Sasquatch laying on it's left side, with right arm over right side of face as he described, then in the lower left foreground you can see the huge right thigh/butt/hamhock/right leg pulled up under the gut and right calf/lower leg moving down toward the lower left corner of the frame. Finally, I see an outline that makes sense. Good job Rod! Edited to add and btw, the picture looks nothing like a hairy human, it looks from what is provided in the frame capture transfer to electrons like a densely furred woodland creature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest believer Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Maybe she is sleeping off a pancake hangover. Behavior changes with blood sugar ups/downs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gershake Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Mary Green interview excerpt not in favour of Rod's/rwidley's view: "The female hominid was not curled up tightly, but rather laying mostly on her back." Mary Green interview excerpt in favour of that view: "The hominid was thick around the middle. I don't know if this was before she had her young one or not." For what it's worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted August 19, 2011 Author Share Posted August 19, 2011 Mary Green interview excerpt not in favour of Rod's/rwidley's view: "The female hominid was not curled up tightly, but rather laying mostly on her back." She said she saw some (not all) of the Kentucky clips. She also noted: "The young female began to move more and more and stir like she was waking up..." I do not believe the frame grab depicts anything that is laying on its back. If Mary Green is speaking of and saw the video where this particular frame grab was taken from, the subject may have moved onto its side while waking up. Just some thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FuriousGeorge Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 True enough I see all the ground litter as well, maybe it rained? Their survival strongly depends on others in it's group and no one was watching it's back on this day. A solo Sasq off on it's own is the best opportunity to collect better evidence for personal or other reasons. JMO. tracker Maybe. I'm sure there has to be a possibility that I didn't account for since it's just one frame to go by. When I first saw it I thought it was dead because the guy is right on top of the thing. Most of the photo's/footage we have seen (other than trail cam photos) are from a long distance. When I read that it was sleeping,.... no way. We would have found hundreds by now if it were that easy to roll up on one like that. IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bsruther Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 If that is a sasquatch, then everything I know about these animals is wrong. The entire premise of their existence and survival is off. That looks like a pretty crunchy day in the woods. The stealthiest ninja photographer would sound like he is making jiffy pop while approaching that animal in that environment. If it still snoozes through the approach, I was way off with what I thought they were like. I thought their survival was based on the fact they could detect such things. Looks like that photographer probably could have plucked a hair sample while he was there. A few weeks ago, masterbarber posted this link in the EP thread. http://dapht.blogspot.com/p/kentucky-bigfoot-habituation.html It's a report from one of the first researchers to have visited the Ky pancake site. A quote from the report. "But here we’d had what appeared to us to be a young bigfoot, nonchalantly strolling in the open, leaving its prints for all to see, acting very strangely indeed so far as any of us could say. It didn’t fit the profile we had learned to expect over the years of research we relied on. But if that young bigfoot had grown up knowing the people in that house on the hill left food out for it, perhaps its behavior would be very different? This could account for Robert’s ease in filming it." Maybe this type of interaction will shape future behavior if Bigfoot are proven to be real. Probably not a good thing, IMO. But then, I guess it could all be a bunch of hooey too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts