Jump to content

Rick Dyer Again (Continued)


Guest Admin

Recommended Posts

If someone is making an assertion regarding a questionable subject, they have to prove it is real, not the other way around. We don't have to prove it is a hoax.

They have not presented any proof that their assertion is real, let alone the ex

Extraordinary evidence required to support their extraordinary claims!

Put up or shut up. Period.

St. G-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. Musky confided very sensitive information to you. A virtual stranger. Without an NDA? Don't you find that odd?

Yes it is a bit odd. But I think Musky is a bit odd as is most of us. I'am not a total stranger though. He reads this thread and others and knows who supports him and who doesnt. So I guess he may have built up a bit of trust in me for example. I am sure he would have done the same with any of us die hard wait and see-ers? I do feel though that there was an element of wanting to stir things up a bit here in it too. Cant blame him though by reading what he reads here. And it did! Not sure I really wanted to be the channel for that but at the time I didnt really care.

I like living life dangerously...!

Is it my imagination or is that Musky fella asking people to prove that its a hoax in the post above ?

Yes and I can say the same, can you prove that its a hoax? Can you prove that its not a hoax?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and I can say the same, can you prove that its a hoax? Can you prove that its not a hoax?

Come on JackiLB! You know how it works by now :)

If we went by your logic we'd still all be believing in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy.

NB: for any kids under 10 reading this, Santa Claus does exist, I'm only messing.

Lee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam's claim is at least believable. Can you seriously not see the difference? If I say I went for a walk in the woods today or I went to the moon, I can't prove either but one is believable and one is not. Maybe you'll just give me the benefit of the doubt that I went to the moon.

Right but your claim to the moon is not the same in my opinion.

If you claim to see bigfoot, you describe in detail what you see you don't have Photo or any other proof. Is it believable and possible that it is true? All we are taking in both situations is a persons telling of a story. What is believable is based on our point of view. If I don't believe in Bigfoot then your description would be not believable.

Adam could come in and say the CT police are after me. would you believe it? You don't know me. You could Doc me on internet and find out stuff. You can build a profile of who you think I am. Then you can build out yea it is possible that what Adam says is true.

Like i have said who we believe and how is based on our experience with the person. I have known people I thought i trusted and believed and made claims they never did stuff only to find out I was wrong. We all have done this I am sure.

I sorry I don't see the difference. between Musky and what Adam says.

If your new to the site and you base it off this thread. You see Adam going on and on that this is a Hoax how one can believe RD or Musky. Then he brings up the cops are after RD. Guess you don't see the possible motivation in saying that. Just something else to try to discredit Musky and Rick from us who say lets wait and see where is the harm in that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JackiLB, I nor anyone else needs to prove it's a hoax or prove it is not a hoax. That's hogwash. The claimant needs to prove their statement that there is a real dead BF. Period. We KNOW people hoax. We KNOW people lie. We KNOW people can be mistaken. What we don't KNOW is if BF is real. Why is this so hard for some to grasp?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on JackiLB! You know how it works by now :)

If we went by your logic we'd still all be believing in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy.

NB: for any kids under 10 reading this, Santa Claus does exist, I'm only messing.

Lee

Phewww

I am glade you were messing because i was hoping to see the "Dwayne Johnson" someday :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JackiLB, I nor anyone else needs to prove it's a hoax or prove it is not a hoax. That's hogwash. The claimant needs to prove their statement that there is a real dead BF. Period. We KNOW people hoax. We KNOW people lie. We KNOW people can be mistaken. What we don't KNOW is if BF is real. Why is this so hard for some to grasp?

So what is the harm in waiting?

If it is a Hoax it will be reveled sometime if not it we will have confirmation of Bigfoot.

April 27th right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on JackiLB! You know how it works by now :)

If we went by your logic we'd still all be believing in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy.

NB: for any kids under 10 reading this, Santa Claus does exist, I'm only messing.

Lee

Iam sorry but SANTA CLAUS DOES EXIST :kingxmas:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem with waiting, CathMcmillan. Except for the loss of time. I've been waiting 30 years. I'm sure April 28th will be just another day...just like April 27th. Just like 2008. Just like Daisy is in the box. Just like Biscardi's claims. Just like Dyers. Just like Melba's. Just like Ericksons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...