Guest Thepattywagon Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 But think about this. If he did go to that homeless camp area and saw the bigfoot he was the only one who took the initiative to follow up on that 911 call. How do you know he was the only one who investigated that report? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Bobo has stated unequivically that he thinks it is a hoax. Next guess Bindernagel . Even more reason for him to go! BoBO BoBO rah rah rah LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 How do you know he was the only one who investigated that report? The first person I know of who investigated that 911 call was an investigator out of Texas by the name of Rick T (I don't think he is a member here, so I am not going to out his name entirely) But, Dyer was NOT the first - not by a long shot. Heck, even the news crews were there before Dyer. LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Perhaps what they have seen is a direct challenge to some of their point system, perhaps they want to truly understand the morphology before they report on it and have their report pooped on by armchair researchers. Perhaps...they do not want a repeat of Musky's situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 they won't discuss what that is even though they have no NDA - and have "confirmed on all points" everything else they have ever viewed... Now that has all changed almost over night -- that speaks volumes to someone like me. But that is the thing, they do!! Its very clever. I applaud them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 (edited) Perhaps what they have seen is a direct challenge to some of their point system, perhaps they want to truly understand the morphology before they report on it and have their report pooped on by armchair researchers. Perhaps...they do not want a repeat of Musky's situation. I hope you are not calling me an armchair researcher -the way you said it has a very negative connotation.. FYI - some of the smartest people in this community do not get into the field - but they are a wealth of information and have helped me understand many things. Have the FB/FB guys ever gotten out into the field? Edited February 26, 2013 by Melissa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Even more reason for him to go! BoBO BoBO rah rah rah LOL The whole team can go and REALLY Find Bigfoot ; ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest njjohn Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 (edited) Just watching the thread today, there's even more aspects of it that don't add up. Ronn - He also said someone big in the BF world already saw it and would confirm. That person never came forward. So now promises of someone else.... It's a delaying tactic. Keep waiting, someone out of the 100 people that saw it will confirm. In the meantime here's a habitual liar named Allen Issleb. He's the only source out of 100+ that they can supply? Jacki - NDA's aren't to allow you to release information, they're to stop you from releasing information. And they don't make separate NDA's for each individual person. The NDA is a ruse to give an excuse and delay. Do you really think an NDA is going to allow you to talk freely only on FB/FB and Dyer's shows? The fact he refuses to talk to anyone else unless he can prepare his answers tell plenty. Actions speak louder than words. Dyer has repeatedly said it's coming out in March. Tribeca isn't until April. To even get in Tribeca, it would have had to been submitted by November. Since they're still working on it, that ship has sailed. It's going straight to TV, which wouldn't happen if you had the biggest story this generation has ever seen. It's being drawn out for a reason, and it's not for a reveal. It's for anticipation and attention. Perhaps what they have seen is a direct challenge to some of their point system, perhaps they want to truly understand the morphology before they report on it and have their report pooped on by armchair researchers. Perhaps...they do not want a repeat of Musky's situation. If it was a challenge, Musky's interview wouldn't have given them point by point of their checklist. They'd prove each other wrong, which would kill the story... Edited February 26, 2013 by njjohn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I hope you are not calling me an armchair researcher.. FYI - some of the smartest people in this community do not get into the field - but they are a wealth of information and have helped me understand many things. Have the FB/FB guys ever gotten out into the field? Not you Melissa, I should have just said the peunut gallery that would tear down whatever they had to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Plus 1 for njjohn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 No, I have no idea. But, knowing Dr. Meldrum - they weren't as bad as Dyer would like everyone to believe. Dr. Meldrum is in this to prove the existence of this animal - and he will meet with whomever says they have that proof. You will pay for his plane tickets, hotel costs, and a per diem (maybe) but Dr. Meldrum doesn't care who is making the claim - he cares if the claim is real and will go wherever the claim is being made (if asked). Drop in the bucket when you've got a dead BF in the bank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 VioletX said: Not you Melissa, I should have just said the peunut gallery that would tear down whatever they had to say. Well, you should be careful who you include in that peanut gallery. There are some very good researchers with years of experience who really dislike what FB/FB have been doing. They have taken some of the worst footage - and footage we know to be a hoax and "confirmed on all points".... That is not cool. I wish they would be more selective and actually vet the footage better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Jacki - NDA's aren't to allow you to release information, they're to stop you from releasing information. And they don't make separate NDA's for each individual person. The NDA is a ruse to give an excuse and delay. Do you really think an NDA is going to allow you to talk freely only on FB/FB and Dyer's shows? The fact he refuses to talk to anyone else unless he can prepare his answers tell plenty. Actions speak louder than words. When you say 'he' njjohn who are you talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Dyer has repeatedly said it's coming out in March. Tribeca isn't until April. To even get in Tribeca, it would have had to been submitted by November. Since they're still working on it, that ship has sailed. It's going straight to TV, which wouldn't happen if you had the biggest story this generation has ever seen. It's being drawn out for a reason, and it's not for a reveal. It's for Actually I would see it TV over movie if it was the biggest story this Generation. NDA, depends on who wrote it. Again we assume its the movie company but RD is part owner do we know who the other owner is. We get Embargo's for where I work all the time. Each client has a different set up depending on what the job is related too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Jacki - NDA's aren't to allow you to release information, they're to stop you from releasing information. And they don't make separate NDA's for each individual person. The NDA is a ruse to give an excuse and delay. Do you really think an NDA is going to allow you to talk freely only on FB/FB and Dyer's shows? The fact he refuses to talk to anyone else unless he can prepare his answers tell plenty. Actions speak louder than words. When you say 'he' njjohn who are you talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts