Guest Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Guest of Squatch, his whole point was if you are scared of them coming close to your house then surround your house with game cameras and they will stay away. Either that or you will have great photos. You just backed up what he was saying with what you said. I can't even believe I'm commenting on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DWA Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 OK. I know that the BFF should be a safe haven for habituators to talk to one another about what they're doing, comparing notes, etc. But Guest? You're going beyond that to make assertions that starkly raise the question: IF YOU ARE SO SURE WHERE'S THE PROOF? When you start talking down to those who aren't sharing your alleged experience, expect, well, the expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Does anyone know if Justin could lead others to the site of the killing? I might go a long way towards identifying BF by aquiring bone marrow DNA? Yes, Justin has taken quite a few researchers back to the site. Bobo, Bart, Meldrum, Derek, etc... He has taken researchers back there on more than one occasion. They spent a lot of time searching the area, but found nothing. Bart C. has some amazing thermal of several possible sasquatch surrounding their camp one of the times they were there. He is supposed to release it sometime in the next month or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Don't TROLL ME, BRO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wudewasa Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 MM has to stop the BS, it serves no purpose really, just making himself look bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ike Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Um...Guest, normally I am not this blunt, but, show me proof. Show me pics. IMO, they do not "go invisible". Do you have anything to back up your statements? -SNY No, because there isn't any. IF these creatures had the powers GOS describes, why would they need his "protection?" Why would they need to speak English if they have telepathic communication ability? Why would they feel compelled to restack hay--because they're good neighbors? To help out someone whose ticker is about to quit at any moment? Why wouldn't they stay invisible all the time? Then the final kicker...I don't need to prove anything to anybody. That's always an argument winner. In fact, it think it has convinced me. Nothing to question here folks. This story is absolutely fact and don't anybody dare question it or make feeble demands for proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 (edited) Pretty much, because if the team thought it was real they'd be all over it. Their already high ratings would blow out the roof. They already have the television spotlight and they would benefit ten fold. I ask why are they not going all in? I can answer this from a production point of view easily enough. Because it takes WEEKS of prep (preparation) to make a show. You just cannot show up the day before and begin filming. You have contracts to hammer out with the actual location (who owns it etc), with witnesses, and you have to have your filming permits all up to date with the i's dotted and the t's crossed. You have to have your insurance papers documented. You have to have your film crew hired (or if you use a regular team) and ready to go. You have to have your hotels and travel arrangemetns made and you need your Teamster drivers hired. You have to have your hire paperwork finished on everyone before they set foot at the location. Your craft service has to be hired and ready to go to feed your crew. You need cameras and dollies and lighting and and and and... it is not just a show-up-with-a-steadicam-and-go affair. There's TONS more to it than that average person knows. You have to make various guilds happy - the Screen Actor's Guild (SAG), Writers Guild of America (WGA), Teamsters, AFTRA etc.... it's all paperwork and legalities. It's all about the money. The episodes are all plotted out weeks in advance and all these locations are being prepped. I'd guess at any one time, they have four or six locations being prepped and one shooting, with three or four in post production. I'd have to read their credits to tell you how many directors they are utilizing etc. to make all these shows. How many episodes per season are they making? 26? That's a lot of work. Not only does a director actually shoot a show, s/he is involved in prepping it, then shooting it, then going through post and working with the editor, composer, sound etc. And you have to have your product placement, your publicity, your research and focus groups all ready to go. It's insanely complicated. To change a shooting schedule would be very difficult. And they go to different areas in the country to keep the viewers happy. Don't be fooled. They KNOW where the bigfoots are - and it doesn't really matter. It's a SHOW, not a research documentary. It's not about documenting a new species, it's about finding out where they might be, letting people tell their stories, and entertainment. They are not doing research. Come on, all four know how to find a bigfoot... they are not stupid, no matter what anyone says. I am impressed as heck with Cliff and Renae. I've only watched half a show, so I'm no expert on "Finding Bigfoot" but I do know production and how it works. Give them a break. It's just entertainment, nothing more Um, and really, the producers and studio execs don't give a darn whether bigfoot is real or not. The only question is... would it make a good show? Would it bring in good ratings? Would people WATCH IT? THAT is the ONLY question the studio wants answered. Anything else is frosting on the cake. And by the way, the news is much the same. You think the news channels actually report on NEWS? Really. It's all about the money and control. Control of information and making money. How to 'spin' things so that people with 10-second attention spans watch their show vs someone else's. Follow the money. They'll report on bigfoot as long as it's sensationalist and makes someone money. Otherwise, read up in some dry dusty tome in a research library someday. Anything that is shown "tonight" for instance, shot weeks ago. WEEKS. Edited December 2, 2012 by madison5716 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuyInIndiana Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Clearly, you are not in constant contact with seasoned field investigators, if you were, you would be up of the most current data, Having been involved with 'research' 9 years now, and knowing some VERY seasoned, legit field investigators, I would tell you the *data* and stories I hear here, don't comport with "the most current data" in bigfooting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thermalman Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 (edited) Yes, Justin has taken quite a few researchers back to the site. Bobo, Bart, Meldrum, Derek, etc... He has taken researchers back there on more than one occasion. They spent a lot of time searching the area, but found nothing. Bart C. has some amazing thermal of several possible sasquatch surrounding their camp one of the times they were there. He is supposed to release it sometime in the next month or so. Okay, thanks JRid. Oh, btw GofS, I just happen to watch "Predator" today (3rd or 4th time). It seems that your creatures have all the qualities of Arnold's nemesis. Are we close? Edited December 3, 2012 by thermalman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 You're the one who brought up Ketchum in this thread That's not true Nov 29 nice guy John was complaining about Matt's MK twitter or something. I started when I told how I seen Finding Bigfoot was on CNN because scientists want to protect Bigfoot from them. No, but you can offer evidence to support your boy's claim that the study is a fraud...oh So, you claim the study is "a rat". They are doing that on their own and I would much rather see them show the paper and make MM look like a jerk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 I skipped from page three because I didn't have the time to catch up. I got a question? Is Tim K really Matt M? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 I skipped from page three because I didn't have the time to catch up. I got a question? Is Tim K really Matt M? Wouldn't that be something! Let me know if I am I'd like to start a law firm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ike Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 I got a question? Is Tim K really Matt M? This thought has crossed my mind as well, or at least someone associated with the show. Tim seems to be very vested in FB even in the face of being given numerous good reasons why he shouldn't be. I suspect he is either very young and impressionable; a shill for FB/MM/BRFO; a scofftic trying to stir something up; unable to use the power of reasoning. Any way we cut it, I'd just recommend we quit feeding it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 This thought has crossed my mind as well, or at least someone associated with the show. Tim seems to be very vested in FB even in the face of being given numerous good reasons why he shouldn't be. I suspect he is either very young and impressionable; a shill for FB/MM/BRFO; a scofftic trying to stir something up; unable to use the power of reasoning. Any way we cut it, I'd just recommend we quit feeding it. I have nothing to do with the show other than I enjoy it like the rest of the people in the ratings. What exactly are these numerous reasons to hate it? Or even MM for that matter because I missed that post. What did he do? Make a press release to the world he has discovered DNA without anything to show? If the show was that bad as you try to make it out to be it would of ended in the first season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SquatchinNY Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 (edited) Deleted by Moi Edited December 3, 2012 by SquatchinNY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts